Ep 123: Jezebel!

← All episodes
Aug 10, 2025 56m 07s

Description

Ooooh MAMA! For a story that's thousands of years old, we sure do hear a lot about Jezebel. Or do we? Pastors and Christian influencers like Mark Driscoll and Charlie Kirk love to invoke the idea of "Jezebel spirit" whenever they don't like what a woman is doing. But is their portrait of the character of Jezebel honest, or are they just looking for a bludgeon to beat up women?

Then, we're looking at two groups that get mentioned a lot in the New Testament. Who are the Pharisees and Sadducees? Were they good guys? Bad guys? Just guys? What was their role in Jewish society at the time of Jesus, and is the Biblical account of them fair?

----

Follow us on the various social media places:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Have you ordered Dan McClellan's New York Times bestselling book ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Bible Says So⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ yet???

Transcript

00:00According to some early Mormons, they inhabit an oasis behind ice walls up at the North Pole.

00:10So wow, yeah, just throw in that out there, man, you're just chucking that bomb and then

00:17running away.

00:18Okay.

00:19That's what we do here.

00:20We show up with muddy the waters and we scamper off.

00:25Hey, everybody, I'm Dan McClellan and I'm Dan Beecher and you're listening to the Data

00:34Over Dogma podcast where we increase public access to the academic study of the Bible

00:39and religion.

00:40And we combat the spread of that wacky misinformation about the same.

00:45How are things today?

00:46Dan, wacky things are very wacky.

00:51We're going to get into some wackiness.

00:52I feel like I'm like the morning talk radio guy.

00:57We need a, we need a air horn.

01:00Yeah.

01:01Yeah.

01:02Yeah.

01:03Or the, the, the trusty boy, is always good.

01:08A slide whistle.

01:09We need all the things we need, but we won't have them, even though we are going to be

01:14talking about some clowns, or at least in my, in our estimation, we're bringing in a

01:21new, a new segment category.

01:25Yes.

01:26We're calling it Twisted Scripture because we're not going to take it anymore because

01:32we're not going to take it.

01:35And we are going to go after some, some guys who are very interested in weaponizing some

01:42scripture against a group, we're going to, we're going to be talking about that Jezebel

01:48spirit.

01:49Yeah.

01:50That's the one.

01:51And then old timey Jezebel spirit, Jezebel spirit.

01:56And then we're going to go into, we're going to do a, what's that?

01:59We're going to, we're going to delve into some Sadducees, some Pharisees, some dirty

02:05knees.

02:06Look at these, some dirty deeds and dirty knees and yeah.

02:12And we're going to figure out the difference between these two groups.

02:16I think I just referenced a very racist thing from my childhood and didn't mean to the,

02:22the, the dirty knees thing.

02:23So let's just pretend like that didn't happen.

02:26Okay.

02:27That just came out of my head.

02:28Okay.

02:29Yeah.

02:30Never mind.

02:31I did.

02:32We're not going to go into it.

02:33But if we had very different offerings.

02:34Yes.

02:35I'm going to, I'm going to voluntarily apologize for that.

02:40It was just, it was just lurking in the background of my, of, of my childhood and my brain and

02:46we'll, we'll, we'll get out of that and we'll go, we'll, we'll go on with the show plow

02:51valiantly forward with twisted scripture.

02:59And this week's twisted scripture is the Jezebel spirit and the reason that we're calling

03:05it twisted is that the way, first of all, the phrase Jezebel spirit does not appear in

03:14ye old Bible.

03:17It's nowhere in there.

03:19Nope.

03:20So, so why do we have all of these preachers and, and also like white, you know, Christian

03:29nationalists talking about it.

03:32I, you know, I, I brought it up because I saw a thing, I brought it up to you because I

03:36saw a thing on the threads that was Charlie Kirk talking about how great it is that young

03:43men are going back to church and how, but young women, women of the new, the young generation

03:49got to get rid of that Jezebel spirit.

03:54And I've heard this phrase many times and I was like, you know what, we got, we got to

03:59go after that.

04:00We got a, we got to talk about it.

04:02Yeah.

04:03You see it quite a bit in Charlie Kirk has said it.

04:06Oh, I'm forgetting the, the gentleman who Mars Hill was at the name of the Mark Driscoll.

04:12Mark Driscoll.

04:13I've heard Mark Driscoll talk about it.

04:15Oh, he loves it.

04:16I, I, I saw a whole, I, I watched some of as much as I could tolerate of a video of his

04:22called the 29 signs of the Jezebel spirit.

04:25I think you've done your research today.

04:29I did my, I tried to do some research about these things.

04:33And so yeah, this guy, first of all, yeah, that pastor Driscoll, he's, he's a, a real

04:40peach.

04:43He started off his, his sermon by making a joke about how he had set up a website where

04:51the, the men in his congregation can send pictures of their wives so that they could

04:57be shown while he talks about the different, the 29 signs of the Jezebel spirit.

05:05Saying ha, ha, ha, it was a joke that he was making about how the men in his congregation

05:12have Jezebel spirit wives that's a, that's pretty loathsome.

05:19Yeah.

05:20Like did men actually were like, yeah, put my wife up on the screen, talk about her Jezebel

05:24spirit.

05:25They laughed about it.

05:26They, they, they were excited to do it.

05:28It, it felt very gross.

05:31But look, I'm putting cart before a horse here, okay, let us talk quickly about Jezebel

05:37herself.

05:38Yes, because there is a biblical Jezebel help me out there.

05:46Is there a historical Jezebel?

05:47Do we know?

05:49So the name Jezebel would be, where is the prince in Hebrew?

05:58Okay.

05:59So it would be E and then Zavul and, and this is related to the, the whole Beelzebub being

06:08a corruption of Baal Zavul.

06:10So this is supposed to be the daughter of the king of Tyre.

06:15The, the name is probably related to like, Isabel is related to, to this name.

06:23Sure.

06:24Which I think we do have records of this name in, in some cognate literature, although

06:32it might be slightly different.

06:34We do have a name E-Ball, which would be the same where it's ball instead of Zavul.

06:39So where is the Lord in reference to ball?

06:42And so this is a, in 1 Kings 16, this is described as, as the wife of King Ahab, daughter

06:48of the king of Tyre.

06:50So this would be the Israelite king taking a Phoenician wife.

06:55Okay.

06:57And she was, is that like, is it, would that be like a certain, you know, you hear about

07:03in European history, if, you know, the king of France marries a princess of, you know,

07:11Germany, then they're creating alliance by doing that.

07:15Yes.

07:16Yes.

07:17He even, even King Solomon married a bunch of, of women and including the, the, the Queen

07:22of Sheba ostensibly.

07:24So we have, this is not unusual, although it is kind of represented as the king betraying

07:32his, his fidelity to, to Adonai, the God of Israel.

07:38And particularly because Jezebel is then supposed to go on and persecute and kill a bunch of

07:45the prophets, and including hunting down Elijah and Jezebel, supposed to have died an ignominious

07:54death as well.

07:56But she is represented as being someone who promoted idolatry and the worship of deities,

08:06specifically, Ashera and Baal, she's represented as, as promoting the worship of those two.

08:14And so she's, she's held up as, as this corrosive influence on Israel as one of the queens who

08:23was married to King Ahab.

08:24So this would have been 900 BC to 850 BC, somewhere around there.

08:32Okay.

08:33Yes.

08:34I, yeah.

08:35You, you mentioned how she's held up and maybe we should say that.

08:38Maybe we should.

08:39Here's what I think.

08:40I'm going to say some of the things that are attributed to her, and then we can go back

08:46as we talk about the actual biblical accounting of her and see if it lines up with what is,

08:54with how she is described because she is described as domineering and overbearing and unwilling

09:01to submit to authority.

09:03Oh, by the way, you, you mentioned her name, meaning, what did it mean?

09:09Where is the Prince?

09:10Where is the Prince?

09:11Well, you're going to have to explain to Mark Driscoll why, why it means that because

09:16he was very sure that it means without husband, which is a very, which is, I had to look

09:25that up.

09:26I looked up why it said that.

09:28And let's see if I can have that somewhere.

09:32I didn't find it, but it looks like it was just sort of a corruption.

09:34It was one of those things where it's like, like, instead of like something, instead of

09:43Zavul, it was Zavel, and that meant dung or lofty slash noble, which meant not lofty

09:52or noble.

09:53And then so then they said it meant without honor or without.

09:57And then somehow that was, anyway, this was just was apparently a husband.

10:03Yeah.

10:04I don't know.

10:05Anyway, I think that's nutty because the entire thing about her is that she has a husband.

10:12So what are we even talking about here?

10:16I don't know why he would make that argument that I mean, where is the Prince?

10:20If it were a ball, it would be where is ball, but ball is also a word that can mean master

10:27Lord or husband, right?

10:28So where is the husband is a way you could interpret that?

10:33If you really wanted to squeeze that interpretation in there, but that's not her name.

10:39Right.

10:40So I don't think that makes much sense.

10:43But yeah, certainly that doesn't really fit with anything.

10:46The whole thing is that she is the husband of the Wicked King Ahab, but she is she orchestrates

10:54the the murder of Naboth, the cease is vineyard land consolidation for Ahab uses deceit uses

11:03false witnesses uses her cunning to get what she wants.

11:08And she does it she uses it to get what he wants.

11:13Yeah, she's doing the bidding of frequently doing the bidding of her husband or and and

11:18you know, a lot of this comes down to interpretation.

11:21If you want to interpret it as as her at the reins, right?

11:25Her being the one making the decisions and just holding up her husband as the authority

11:30figure as the rubber stamp, like I'm sure people who who don't like women being independent

11:39would would be happy to interpret the text that way.

11:42Yeah, I think we're going to get to it.

11:44But I think that will be we'll find that to be the crux of a lot of things.

11:49Yes.

11:50But because the Bible, you know, one of the things that they accuse her of is like you

11:53said, she promoted the worship of ball and Asha.

12:01And she like, rah, rah, rah.

12:04And there is a scripture.

12:05I did a lot of research on this.

12:08There is a scripture that says that like, you know, where are these, these, uh, priests

12:14of of ball and Asha, yeah, sit at her table that sit at Jezebel's table or something.

12:20Yeah.

12:21I'm going to point out that in, uh, we're in first Kings.

12:25Is that where we are?

12:26Yeah.

12:27First Kings 16, uh, down at the bottom, it says of her husband, Ahab, he erected an

12:36altar for ball in the house of ball that he built in Samaria, Samaria, ahab also made

12:44a sacred pole.

12:45I assume that that's an Asha a pole.

12:47That would be an Asha.

12:49Yeah.

12:50And the Ab did, Ahab did more to promote, provoke the anger of the Lord, the, the God

12:55of Israel than had all the kings of Israel who were before him.

12:59Yeah.

13:00No mention in any of that of Jezebel just says he did it.

13:07Mm hmm.

13:08He, it's a earlier, like the, the verse before that, it says he took us his wife Jezebel and

13:15then he erected the altar for bay.

13:17So you could say, I don't know, does chronology equal causation because it doesn't seem like

13:24it does.

13:25Well, we do have a parenthetical comment in first Kings 21, 25 where this is the NRSVUE.

13:30Indeed, there was no one like Ahab who sold himself to do what was evil in the sight of

13:35the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel.

13:39Right.

13:40And so the Hebrew has which, uh, Hey, Satah, which is based on a verb, soat, which means

13:46to incite or mislead, uh, Hey, Satah, Joe Jezebel, each toe, his wife.

13:53So, uh, the, the text there suggests that Jezebel is inciting him to do, uh, all of these

14:00things.

14:01So it sounds like she is functioning as a bit of a scapegoat, uh, for a hab, but certainly

14:06it's, it, it's not leaving a hab blameless.

14:09Yeah.

14:10It just seems to me that like, I mean, and yes, that, that is there.

14:16That, that's sort of that parenthetical that you referred to as tucked in with Elijah pronouncing

14:23a sentence upon them or whatever because of Naboth's vineyard, but that's deeper.

14:31That's, that's when that's, you know, that's many chapters later into, you know, into this

14:39whole thing and she, you know, in that, in that chapter, we do see her doing her like

14:47being very integral in everything.

14:50She did.

14:51She was the one that orchestrated things in that chapter for, for which she is being,

14:56you know, they're being sentenced or whatever.

14:58Well, there's something, um, let me just, uh, king, so we've got Elijah is confronting

15:05a hab and then we have, um, Elijah's triumph over the, uh, the prophets of ball or the

15:11priests of ball profits, but the, the section heading in the NRSVUE says priests, um, but

15:18here's the interesting thing.

15:19You said that it says that they sat at her table, right?

15:23Mm.

15:24Um, assembly.

15:25That's first 19 in the, uh, in, in chapter 18.

15:30So here's the funny thing with the 450 prophets of ball and the 400 prophets of Ashera who

15:38eat at Jezebel's table.

15:39So here's the funny thing.

15:41That's a big table.

15:42It is a big table.

15:44She's got, um, she's got a large table, lots of chairs.

15:48Um, the rest of the story, hmm, entirely omits any reference to any prophet or priest of Ashera.

16:00It is entirely and exclusively about the 450 prophets of ball of ball.

16:07And then it says, um, sees the very end, uh, 1840 Elijah said to them, sees the prophets

16:14of ball, do not let one of them escape.

16:15Then they seized them and Elijah brought them down to the Wadi Qishon and killed them there.

16:22And that's the end of that.

16:24Well, you, you have, uh, and then a, uh, Elijah says to a hab go eat and drink for there was

16:29a sound of rushing rain and so the, uh, the drought ends.

16:32Mm hmm.

16:33So a lot of people, a lot of scholars will suggest that the reference to the prophets

16:38of, um, Ashera is probably a later edition.

16:43Some editor was probably like, yeah, throw the one about the, the, uh, the Ashera folks

16:48and Jezebel in there as well.

16:50And then they did and just ignored that they're not in the rest of the story.

16:55Huh.

16:56So that's very interesting.

16:59Yeah.

17:01I think one of the things that has me sort of baffled by how Jezebel is seen and how,

17:13and how she is portrayed by people recounting the story, not in the Bible itself, but by

17:20people talking about the story is that everything she does, if it were done by a man would just

17:31like, yeah, she's the bad guy because she and Ahab are pro the wrong God, right?

17:38That's, that's why they're the bad guys.

17:40Yeah.

17:41But like, so, you know, when she starts killing all of the, the prophets or the priests of

17:47Adonai, that's bad.

17:53But when Elijah kills all of the prophets and priests of ball, that's good.

18:01They're doing the same stuff.

18:04So like, I, but turn of a turn about isn't fair play when it's a woman who does it.

18:10You know what I mean?

18:11It's definitely a gendered villainy that, that she's painted with.

18:17And you don't really see much of that elsewhere in, in the Hebrew Bible.

18:22Like the women, the sex workers are generally treated quite well.

18:29Yeah.

18:30You have, you have, for instance, Judas, Judah and Tamar, Judah's like, oh, you got me there.

18:35That was a good one.

18:36That was a good one because she caused played as a sex worker and all the way through to

18:45the end.

18:46And you know, you have Rahab at a Jericho.

18:52You have other women who are treated as, you know, they have a, they have a positive role

18:58in the narrative in the story, but Jezebel is the one kind of negative one where she

19:03gets, like there's no indication she ever functioned as a sex worker, like promiscuity

19:11isn't a part of her story.

19:13Right.

19:14But it gets represented that way because we need, we need a female villain.

19:20And what's the worst thing that a female can do is be promiscuous.

19:24Well, you know, she just by, there's a guilt by association.

19:28She's a female.

19:29It must be, and I have seen a lot of talk about how Jezebel spirit involves promiscuity.

19:37But I will say that it is not entirely unbiblical because there's the reference to her in Revelation.

19:42Revelation.

19:43Yeah.

19:44And this is where we have the two in the letters in chapters two and three, we get these references

19:52to Jezebel, and then the other one is Balaam, these, these two kind of symbols of unrighteousness

20:01and, and wayward leadership.

20:04Right.

20:05And the author is criticizing these folks.

20:09And so Jezebel is accused of seducing Christians to practice sexual immorality and to eat foods

20:17sacrificed to idols.

20:19Those are the two things for which Jezebel is condemned.

20:23And I don't know if we've talked about this before, but there is a theory out there.

20:27It's certainly not the leading theory, but it is a theory that the author of Revelation

20:33is condemning Paul as the Jezebel.

20:37Oh, yes, because what, what, a couple of the things that Paul talks about in his letters,

20:43one of the things he says is that because they would, they evidently they referred to followers

20:49of Jesus, married to non-Christians.

20:53They said that was poor Nia.

20:54That was sexual immorality.

20:56Right.

20:57And Paul said, no, no, it's not sexual immorality to be unequally yoked for a follower of Jesus

21:04to be married because stay married, you might convert and save the soul of, of your spouse.

21:12And so if there were folks who were committed to the other position that no, this is sexual

21:17immorality, then Paul would have been responsible for seducing Christians to practice sexual

21:23immorality.

21:24And Paul quite openly said, eating food sacrificed to idols is nothing.

21:28Who cares?

21:29Right.

21:30That's no big deal.

21:31It's only if you're in the presence of a weaker follower of Jesus who doesn't know that an

21:36idol is nothing in this world, that it then becomes a problem for you to scandalize them.

21:42Oh, that's really interesting.

21:43Yeah.

21:44And so that is Paul advocating for, or at least not condemning eating food sacrifice to idols,

21:52even though according to Acts, the chapter 15, that's one of the four things that non-Jewish

21:59Christians were responsible for.

22:01But there's an argument that it's actually followers of Paul, that the author of Revelation

22:08is condemning because of this Jezebel spirit, so to speak.

22:15To be clear, the reference, the Revelation reference, which is in Revelation two, yeah,

22:22versus 20 to 23.

22:25It does seem to be just using the word Jezebel, but it's actually definitely referring not

22:32to Jezebel in the past, but to someone who is in this congregation currently.

22:38Right.

22:39Like a real person who is leading the congregation of Thyatira astray.

22:50Yes.

22:51And so it's that pronunciation.

22:55Fair enough.

22:56Thyatira.

22:57I don't know.

22:58Anyway, so yeah, it's not an actual reference to the Jezebel of history or of First Kings.

23:09Well as using her as a symbol and a substitution for naming an actual person, and maybe it's

23:18a movement rather than an individual person.

23:22But that's where we get this idea, and that's really, unless I am misremembering, that's

23:32really the only association of Jezebel with sexual immorality.

23:37Yeah.

23:38There's nothing else.

23:39There's an indirect notion that worship of Ashara was invariably associated with sexual

23:47immorality, which would not be that accurate.

23:52That's also just a way to demonize the worship of Ashara.

23:55Who by the way, prior to probably the seventh century BCE was worshiped as God's wife.

24:03And we don't have any indication.

24:05We don't have any data that make it most likely that anybody in any kind of institutional

24:11position had any problem with that.

24:14Right.

24:15Like maybe some prophets did, but even the couple of references and some of the prophetic

24:20literature to Ashara in a condemnatory way are dated by some scholars to the Deuteronomistic

24:31layer according to a number of scholars.

24:34So and this might be why this story about the prophets of Baal has somebody scribbling

24:39in the prophets of Ashara afterwards, because they're coming from a time period later when

24:45Ashara is now the villain, Ashara has been demonized.

24:49Right.

24:50So yeah, so the association of Ashara with sexual immorality is a later development as

24:57well.

24:58Now, when first Kings was written, which I take to not be the time of the actual king

25:05of Ahab, King of Ahab, King of Ahab, no, because like you don't you don't have here's an

25:12interesting tidbit.

25:15You don't have historical prose in alphabetic writing until after Ahab was dead.

25:22Okay.

25:23Like the second half of the ninth century, that's when it first pops up in the record.

25:27And what that means is, and by historical prose, I mean that genre of historical narrative,

25:34if you had poetry, you had letters, you didn't have historical narrative.

25:39So and so was the king of so and so, and then they did this, and then they did that, and

25:43then they did the other thing that that genre doesn't show up in alphabetic writing until

25:49the second half of the ninth century BCE.

25:51So in the Hebrew Bible, if you see narrative prose, that was written after the late ninth

26:00century BCE.

26:02So Kings, Samuel, the overwhelming majority of all of that, apart from a few scattered

26:08pieces of poetry were written after Ahab was was dead and gone.

26:15Now, that doesn't necessarily mean they're not telling stories that were passed down

26:19from the period of their of his reign and her life.

26:25But it would have been committed to text in a later period.

26:29And that means it would have been articulated in a way that served the interests of the

26:33people doing the commission to text.

26:36Well, that's part of what I wanted to ask you about who's writing this, because this

26:42is about Israel, but I read something that indicated that maybe their author was a Judean.

26:50This is probably coming from the Deuteronomistic historian.

26:55So what this means is this is somebody.

26:58So around the time of Josiah, we have the Deuteronomy begins to take shape, which is

27:09Josiah saying, I want the laws to do this.

27:13And then the one day, they're like, guess what we found in the temple, the book of the

27:21law.

27:22And guess what?

27:23It says everything you wanted to say.

27:24And Josiah was a king.

27:25Josiah was a king.

27:26And so after that, you then have the Deuteronomistic history, which is probably taking the historical

27:34animals that precede it by a couple centuries.

27:39And it is a kind of narrativizing these things, but telling the stories in a way that represents

27:48the northern kingdom is wicked and the southern kingdom is good because the northern kingdom

27:53had been destroyed a century before, specifically northern kingdom is Israel.

27:58Israel, southern kingdom is Judah.

28:00Yeah.

28:01Right.

28:02So the northern kingdom had been destroyed 722 BCE.

28:05And so they're not there anymore.

28:07And there are a lot of scholars who think that Judah was just like, Oh, that was us

28:11the whole time.

28:13We were all it was always this United Kingdom, or at least it started out as this United

28:18Kingdom.

28:19And then they were wicked up in the north.

28:21And that's why God carted them off to the lands to the north and dispersed them throughout

28:25the world.

28:27And according to some early Mormons, they inhabit a an oasis behind ice walls up at the North

28:35Pole.

28:36So Wow.

28:37Yeah.

28:38Just just throw in that out there, man, you're just you're just chucking that bomb and then

28:43running away.

28:44Okay.

28:45It's what we do here.

28:46We, we show up with muddy the waters and we scamper off.

28:51So they are writing the story, explaining why the northern kingdom got the boot, explaining

28:59why they're the good guys.

29:00Well, at least some of the kings has a kaya is mostly good king, but not quite all the

29:05way there.

29:06And then Josiah was the big savior king who did everything he was supposed to do.

29:12And so the Deuteronomistic history is this project of recording all of Judah and Israel's

29:18history through the eyes of a Judean through a Judah height, through the eyes of somebody

29:24who who identifies with the southern kingdom, which is why, yeah, the kings in the north

29:30are all all bad guys.

29:33And you know, you see the the on rides when you look in the historical record, Israel was

29:39at its peak in under the on ride dynasty.

29:46But they're just glossed over in the Deuteronomistic history and treated as just meh, they were

29:52there.

29:53And, and this is because they're, they're telling a story in, in a way that makes David

29:58the big hero and Josiah is, you know, supposed to be continuing on the Davidic dynasty.

30:07I see. Okay. So yeah, it's all propaganda. Yeah. Well, and the propaganda continues because

30:15now we have guys like Charlie Kirk, like Mark Driscoll and many others using this phrase,

30:25using the name of Jezebel, using the phrase Jezebel spirit and sometimes meaning like an

30:31actual spirit, like a demon. Yeah, it is bothering the earth that that is like, that is influencing

30:38people badly. But and it's funny because Driscoll keeps saying things like, you know, a man

30:46can have a woman can have the Jezebel spirit or a man can have the Jezebel spirit. A woman

30:51can have the Ahab spirit, but it's always a woman that has the Jezebel spirit. Yeah.

30:57And you know, he didn't say wives send up pictures of your husbands who have the Jezebel

31:03spirit. He's very clear that this is like the Jezebel spirit is women who are bad and

31:10women who are, who will not submit to authority and willing women who are overly controlling

31:16and blah, blah, blah. And really what it, I mean, listen, obviously the Jezebel who

31:24is presented in the Bible is not a good person. Like you said, she, she, she does that whole

31:32thing with the, with the, the vineyard of Naboth, she did a bad thing there. You know,

31:41she, she set him up, got him killed just so that she, so that her husband could have

31:46the land. She's a, in, at least in that part of the story, she is very much a lady Macbeth

31:51type character. But, uh, the way that she is used, the way, the way that she is crafted

32:03as a bludgeon against women who won't submit to their husbands, who won't submit to the

32:09church, who, who, you know, who actually wants to have equal place in their, in their marriages

32:19and in society. Uh, it's, it's pretty gross. I'm just going to say it's pretty gross. Yeah.

32:27And, and it always, the Jezebel spirit rhetoric is always about, um, trying to undermine,

32:37uh, women seeking after a role that these men believe is their unique and exclusive prerogative.

32:47So authority in the church. Oh, uh, if a woman wants that, that's the Jezebel spirit, uh,

32:53eat an equal partnership in the home. If a woman wants that, the Jezebel spirit, if a

32:58woman wants a career, the Jezebel spirit, it's, it is a, it is a rhetorical Trump card for

33:05right-wing authoritarian, uh, sexual politics. I really may have basically heard that phrase

33:11now that I think about it, when Hillary Clinton was running for president. Oh, really? Yeah,

33:16that maybe it may have been my first introduction. And then of course it came back, uh, very

33:20strong also when Kamala Harris was running for president. Yes. These are, these are women

33:26who are possessed of the Jezebel spirit. Yeah. Because they want to do something that these,

33:31that these pastors and, uh, Christian nationalists want to reserve solely for men. Yes. And you

33:38know who they don't say has the Jezebel spirit, uh, Jael, uh, or Deborah and judges five. Uh,

33:48these, these are women who, uh, have, uh, not just, uh, local, but like military authority,

33:55Jael kills another man, uses, uh, you know, invites him in to, uh, to let him rest and

34:03then drives a, a tent peg through his forehead. It's pretty hardcore. She's pretty hardcore.

34:10Yeah. Um, and yeah, I, I think there were probably, there would probably be a lot of

34:16people if, if the full story of, um, uh, oh my gosh, I'm blanking on the, the name Mary

34:26Magdalene. Excuse me. Uh, Mary Magdalene, if her last, if, if the, the name Magdalene truly

34:33was an epithet was a, a title that was given to her, towering one, uh, or tower S or something

34:40like that. Certainly that is a result of her not only seeking after, but obtaining and exercising

34:47authority, including, uh, over men. You never hear about, uh, the Jezebel spirit of, of

34:53Mary Magdalene. Of course, you do have people, um, falsely accusing her of being a sex worker,

35:01uh, based on a, uh, homily given by the pope in 591 CE, which falsely identifies her with

35:11another woman who had, uh, a bunch of sins. And basically the idea again is when it comes

35:18to what a woman can do to sin, really there's just sexual sin that that's about it because

35:24that's all they function as right is a sex receptacle. Uh, and so if they are, uh, if

35:31she's a sinful woman, she must have been a sex worker. And then, uh, identifying that

35:37unnamed woman as Mary Magdalene results in the idea that Mary Magdalene was a sex worker.

35:43Uh, yeah, all features of, of the story that, that don't really play into how folks like

35:51Driscoll and others, Driscoll, by the way, who has been accused and even found liable

35:58for all kinds of abuses of authority and intimidation and, uh, manipulation and lying and deception

36:09and all this kind of stuff, I would say he's domineering, overbearing, yeah, in control

36:14and not willing to be controlled. Uh, I, I would say he is definitely possessed of a

36:21Jezebel spirit as long as a man can be possessed of the Jezebel spirit. He's, he's, uh, yeah,

36:28he's our, uh, yeah, our, uh, our poster child. He's an exemplar. Absolutely. Uh, so there

36:35you go. That's, that's the Jezebel spirit for you. I, I think, uh, Jezebel is definitely

36:43being unfairly treated in this, but that's par for the course in, in terms of the sexism

36:51of how these, how these guys treat almost all any, any woman's, uh, any woman's story

36:59that they come across. As you say, Mary Magdalene definitely didn't, definitely gets the short

37:05end of the stick too. Uh, so there you go. I think we should move on to our next segment.

37:12Uh, what's that? And the, what's that of this, uh, segment, the that in this case are, are

37:25two that's who, what is they, uh, which is the side to Sadducees and the Pharisees. Uh,

37:33the Sadducees and the, and the fair, the Sadducees and the Pharisees. Uh, these are, these are

37:39two of, uh, at least four different, what Josephus calls philosophies of Judaism, which we would,

37:47we would call sects, um, these days, S E C T S. Right. Um, we have the Pharisees, uh, you

37:56have the Sadducees, uh, you have the Essenes, which are another group that I think probably

38:02most scholars today would say is, uh, how the, uh, folks at Coomran who are responsible

38:10for, uh, storing at least the Dead Sea Scrolls, how they were identified. Uh, and then you

38:15have the, uh, the zealots. And there are some other, there are some other groups that are

38:19identified by like Philo and stuff like that. But, but we're focused on the Sadducees and

38:23the Pharisees and these groups probably begin to distinguish themselves around the middle

38:30of the second century BCE. So this is when we have the, we have the, uh, the second temple

38:38is, you know, operating, everybody's bopping along, uh, the, uh, Hellenistic empires are

38:45fighting over this territory. The salutids cause a lot of problems for, uh, the Judeans

38:52and they, and then you have, uh, Antiochus, the fourth epiphanies who comes in does a

38:56lot of bad stuff. So at first and second Maccabees is all about this is what the celebration

39:01of Hanukkah is about. They come in and they desecrate the temple and then, uh, Judah Maccabee,

39:08uh, come, they fight back. They, uh, wrestle control of the temple back from the salutids.

39:14They rededicate the temple. That's what Hanukkah is celebrating. The rededication of the temple.

39:20We just briefly remind me who the salutids are. That's not what this is about, but just

39:25as a quick rabbit trail. Sorry. So Lucid is, uh, is a reference to one of the, um, kind

39:32of groups that controlled a part of Alexander the Great's kingdom. So after he died, you

39:39had a bunch of his, uh, subordinates fighting over control of his territory. And rather

39:46than one person stepping in and taking control of everything that Alexander the Great controlled,

39:52let's split up into a bunch of different territories. And you had the Ptolemy's controlling Egypt

39:59and the salutids. Uh, so Ptolemy was the one who was in Egypt. Celiacus, uh, was the one

40:06who's in Syria. And so Israel Palestine is right in between those two. And so they're

40:12kind of a battleground, uh, between these two groups and, and they kind of went back and

40:16forth, but the salutids, um, cause some trouble. The Maccabees fight back. They win. And this

40:23is actually the reestablishment of a semi autonomous, semi independent kingdom. So for in the

40:32one sixties, B. C. E. Like the Daniel, the book of Daniel is written right around this

40:37time, uh, the, a lot of the apocalyptic literature of second temple Judaism is written around

40:43this time. And for the people living in that time, this must have felt like the fulfillment

40:49of prophecy, because for a long time you've been waiting on restoration and the return

40:54of, uh, the kingdom of Israel. And suddenly the Maccabees win, drive off the invaders

41:01and establish what becomes known as the Hasmonean dynasty and kingdom. Now they are kind of

41:09like, Hey, Rome, we're going to play nice. Um, you know, can we get some help? And so

41:14they are, uh, kind of the, uh, you know, uh, subordinate to Rome in some sense, but they

41:22are an independent kingdom. And so, uh, this is what gives rise to now, uh, some scholars

41:31think this is when the Torah and the Hebrew Bible first begins to become authoritative,

41:37where they're finally like, all right, we have our kingdom back. We got all these texts.

41:41We got all these laws. Let's start putting them into play. And then they win. Oh crap.

41:47They conflict with each other in a bunch of ways and we got a bunch of gaps and we got,

41:52and so you have a bunch of schools of thought that, uh, are trying to figure out how we're

41:57going to, to approach this. The Sadducees may have grown out of, um, the Zadakite priests

42:06and Zadak would have been, um, one of the descendants of Aaron. So this is a priestly household,

42:12a priestly family. And so Sadducees is, is thought by, um, by most scholars to, uh, be

42:19a callback to, to this idea of the Zadakite priests. And so these are wealthy elite people

42:25associated with the temple and they want stability. And so they're very happy to play

42:32nice with Rome as long as, as this gives us stability. And so there's, uh, the high priest

42:41is, is, uh, in later periods after 63 BCE, um, you have Pompeii who annexes Judea for Rome.

42:52So 160s BCE to around 63 BCE, you have an independent Judean kingdom. Right. Um, and

43:01then Rome takes over. And from this point on, the high priest is, is appointed by Rome.

43:07And so it's coming from the, the Sadducees. So they're basically the temple authorities.

43:13The Pharisees are kind of a, a lay movements that are about, uh, the law and they're about

43:21purity. And so this is why in the first century BCE and around the turn of the era, right around

43:26the time of Jesus's life, you have a lot of people focusing on purity and you have things

43:32like stone pots and cups and vessels that do not, uh, do not transmit impurity to the

43:40things that they're, that they're holding. Like this is something that pops up in this

43:44time period because of the Pharisees and the biggest differences between the two, the,

43:49the Pharisees accepted this, uh, oral tradition and the authority of traditions about how to

43:56interpret the law because remember they, they were like, all right, let's, let's get rolling

44:02with, with the implementation of all these laws. And then they were like, Oh wait, it

44:05doesn't all fit. We got to do all these things to, um, to, you know, smooth over the iron

44:12out the wrinkles and everything. And this is what later, the circles, et cetera. Yeah.

44:17And this is what later turns into the rabbinic literature and the halakic, uh, literature,

44:23which is, which is basically, uh, trying to figure out legal questions, answer legal questions

44:29and things like that. The Sadducees reject that. They reject the oral interpretations

44:36and they want to go back to just the Torah. So they're, they're text is the five books

44:44of Moses. And which means that they don't have things like Daniel. They don't have, um,

44:54other texts that develop the concept of resurrection. They don't have discussion of angels and

45:01all this other kind of stuff that's later in the Hebrew Bible and in second temple Jewish

45:06literature that the Pharisees do have. So while the Pharisees are exploring heaven and

45:11hell and resurrection and all this other kind of stuff, the Sadducees are sitting there

45:16with their five books of Moses, like y'all are nuts. I don't know where you're getting

45:20all this. None of this is in here. These extremists over here with their, with their

45:25resurrections and what? Yeah. Yeah. And, and so they were, these were some, some movements

45:30that, that clashed on a lot of things and, and even in the New Testament, you see at one

45:35point, Paul is, is like caught between a rock and a hard place. And he's like angels and,

45:41uh, you know, starts the fight over his head between the, the Sadducees and the Pharisees

45:45and, um, and then, you know, slips out the back door while they're all fighting. So,

45:51uh, so he's, he's exploiting, uh, the, the differences between these two groups. And,

45:58and then because the Sadducees authority is, is based entirely on the temple and not on

46:04like household religion. Like the Pharisees, it's all about, you know, I'm, I'm going

46:09to school. I'm reading the law. I'm, you know, I've got stone cups at home. I'm washing

46:15my hands before the meal and all this. That's, that's kind of this ritual and ideological

46:21framework that governs all different parts of life. Sadducees are like, we're just, we

46:27just deal with the temple. We just deal with the temple and then the temple gets destroyed

46:32and they've got nothing. Right. They've got, they've got no way to, they've got no framework

46:38that they can provide for how to go on. And so for all intents and purposes, the Sadducees

46:44disappear, just stop within a decade or two after 70 CE and the Pharisees basically become

46:52rabbinic Judaism because they have, they have everything else. They have how we do this

46:59at home. They have how we do this in our synagogues. They have how we do this, uh, everywhere

47:05else apart from the temple and with the destruction of the temple, uh, that it doesn't really hurt

47:12their worldview, uh, nearly as much as it hurt the worldview or at least the, the, uh,

47:18the structures of power that held up the Sadducees. And also they were, you know, they were cozy

47:24with Rome and the Pharisees hated that. They were, they shook their fist at Rome and they

47:28shook their fist at the Pharisees. Um, you know, playing, playing nice with Rome. Uh,

47:34and so they had, yeah, those, those are the main differences, uh, between the Sadducees

47:39and the Pharisees as I recall them. Okay. Um, talk to me a little bit about because

47:45look, I, uh, I don't know if everyone knows this. I am not a scholar of the Bible. I have

47:53not read all of the Bible nor have I, but my memory of the word Pharisees is that it only

48:03comes up in the Bible in the New Testament as a pejorative, like it's like, these are,

48:09these are the bad guys in a lot of, in a lot of the stories of the Bible. Is that, is that

48:14right? Am I remembering that correctly? There, there are definitely, uh, those who are Pharisees

48:20who are not represented as bad guys. Like the, the New Testament, most of the New Testament,

48:25I think it would be unfair to say it's anti-Pherasiacal. I think they would attribute a lot of the

48:30faults of, of the Judaism against which they were representing themselves as the product

48:37of the Pharisees, but a lot of that was incidental. That was the fact that the Sadducees were

48:41often their temple doing weird temple stuff. Um, the Pharisees were the ones, uh, in the

48:46streets. And by the time of the gospel of John, it's, it's just the Jews is how, how

48:54Jesus's enemies are generally represented. There is certainly, I, I think, uh, what we

49:00could call, uh, Judea phobia, if not straight up anti-Semitism in different parts of the

49:06New Testament. I, I don't think it is, uh, you know, the, the, you know, if you're a

49:13Pharisee, you're a bad person or something like that. Because, you know, Paul represents

49:18himself as, uh, as a Pharisee. Right. Now, so the, today people use the term Pharisee,

49:27uh, pejoratively, and it's wildly inappropriate. Um, they, that is anti-Semitism today because

49:36it's a, it's a, so it's an anti-Semitic sort of dog whistle. Yeah. It's accusing someone

49:42of being overly legalistic. And I even, I even recorded a video, uh, with a friend Logan

49:48Williams when I was in Italy at this, uh, Enoch seminar where he was pointing out, he's got

49:54a paper that he's, uh, gonna publish soon, soon on this, that when you look at the scenes,

50:00when you look at Jesus in the New Testament, when you look at other non-pharisaical, uh,

50:07interpretations of the law, the Pharisees were commonly dismissed as casuals. Mm. They were

50:15not strict enough. Interesting. They were, and, and even when you look in Matthew, Jesus

50:20says your righteousness must exceed that of the Pharisees or you cannot enter the kingdom

50:25of God. So like when, when you look at the text themselves, the Pharisees are not represented

50:30as these strict legalists. They're, they're frequently represented as, as folks who are

50:35not legalistic enough. And today they, people use Pharisee to mean overly legalistic person

50:43and, and it's inaccurate and it's pejorative. And like I said, the Pharisees would become

50:48rabbinic Judaism, which is the mainstream of Jewish tradition today. And so it is directly,

50:55um, uh, maligning the, uh, the ancestor of contemporary Judaism. And in that sense, it

51:04is, um, antisemitic as well. And yeah, there's the, uh, the whole anti Pharisee thing, uh,

51:14pejorative use of, of Pharisees is it is incredibly common within contemporary Christianity, not

51:21just evangelical Christianity. It is, it is widespread all over Christianity. And there

51:26is a wonderful book that was recently published that I should have gotten handy for this,

51:36for this discussion, uh, called Judea phobia in the New Testament and, and in the back,

51:41there is a handy flow chart that answers the question, can I call this person a Pharisee?

51:49Do all of the things go to know basically, uh, it is the only time you can call somebody

51:58a Pharisee is if you're referring to a, uh, a person in first century or first, first

52:05century CE, first century BCE Judea who identifies as a Pharisee. Right. And everything else

52:12all goes to do not call this person a Pharisee. Right. So, uh, that's the lesson here. Don't

52:18you refer to, are you referring to Paul? Then yes. Yeah. You're referring to your neighbor

52:24Paul who lives down the street. And no, yeah. Uh, stop using it pejoratively. It's anti-Semitic.

52:32It is inaccurate, historically, textually, ecumenically, grammatically. Uh, you know,

52:38in, in all the senses, it's not a good thing to use the term Pharisee pejoratively. I assume

52:44though that I can use the term Sadducees pejorative. Well, I, I tend not to, but I don't, there's

52:51not really, yeah, they don't really, there's not really a reputation to, uh, you know,

52:56for that pejorative. You, you, wealthy temple guy. You, you're such a sad to see that. That

53:03might work within Mormon circles, but, uh, well, that's sure they, they do like probably

53:07temples. Yeah, they, uh, we would have to be a little careful about that. But, um, yeah,

53:14I, I am just in the, I am of the mind that, uh, you should not use designations of, uh,

53:22other ethnic and religious and ideological groups as pejoratives, just in general. Just

53:28in general. Yeah. Um, and you know, except the, the one that I make an exception for is

53:33doofus. I don't think that really counts as an ethnic group or anything like that. Well,

53:39what was it? I, oh, I have no idea where the word came from. It's just a pejorative term.

53:44Yeah. The only time you'll ever see me name calling is if I call somebody a doofus because

53:49I, I feel like that's a pretty tame. Oh man. Somebody right now is heading to the comments

53:55section on YouTube to tell us about the origin of the word doofus and how it's horrible in

54:01some way, but well, until that happens, you're, you're clear to use the word doofus. Um,

54:07probably related to doodoo and goofus. Okay. Night students slang, dolt idiot nerd. Yeah,

54:15by the 1960s. There you go. All right. Uh, well, that, that's great. Thank you for sitting.

54:24I'm so glad when I like actually know what a thing is because you hear the, I, I have

54:31heard the words Pharisees and Sadducees so many times and I haven't really known what

54:38we were talking about. So thank you for that. That is very handy. Yeah. And in, in the New

54:46Testament you will frequently see in the synoptic gospels distinctions between those two and,

54:51and frequently it's significant that they're dealing with the Sadducees because they're

54:55dealing with like temple authorities or something like that, or they're dealing with the Pharisees

54:59because it's people in the streets. And sometimes the Sadducees and Pharisees team up the enemy

55:06of my enemy is right. And then they can form Voltron together and fight against, uh, Captain

55:15Planet. Yeah. All right. Uh, that's it for this week's show. If you would like to hear

55:22Dan talk about his experiences at Comic Con, you can become a patron of the show and then

55:28go over and, uh, and catch the after show because, uh, the, the after party, because that's probably

55:36what we're going to be talking about this week, at least in part. Um, it is such an important

55:41part of how we keep the show going. If you're willing and able to, we would love for you

55:47to become one of our patrons over at patreon.com/dataoverdogma helps us out a ton. Thanks so much for tuning

55:55in this week. Uh, thanks to Roger Gaudy for editing the show. Uh, if you want to get

56:00in touch with us, you can reach out at, uh, contact at dataoverdogmapod.com and we'll talk

56:07to you again next week. Bye everybody.