Ep 98: Did Jesus Go to Hell?
← All episodesDescription
Jesus went to hell! Briefly. He gave the place a look-see after he died, and then left to go be resurrected. Or at least that's the claim that some theologies make.
Where did the idea that Jesus visited hell come from? Is it Biblical? I mean, it would have to be, wouldn't it? People wouldn't just make up something like that long after the Bible had been written just because, right? Right?
And speaking of hell, not every part of the Bible treats that place the same. In our second segment, we'll talk specifically about the book of Revelation and it's treatment of the bad place. Ol' John the revelator had some fascination notions and imagery to share, and his ideas about hell are particularly interesting!
----
HEY! TICKETS FOR THE FIRST LEG OF THE DATA OVER DOGMA TOUR ARE NOW ON SALE! To get yours, go here:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-grand-data-over-dogma-book-launch-tour/
Follow us on the various social media places:
https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod
https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma
Hey! Don't forget to pre-order Dan McClellan's upcoming book The Bible Says So
Transcript
00:00Today, you will be with me in Paradise Luke 2343.
00:04He did not say, "I will see you in hell."
00:06I'm going on, you know.
00:08Yeah.
00:09And that would be a weird thing for Jesus to...
00:11God would be so much better, though, if Jesus turns to the guy on the other cross and goes,
00:17"I'll see you in hell."
00:19Hey, everybody, I'm Dan McClellan.
00:24And I'm Dan Beecher.
00:25And you're listening to the Data Over Dogma podcast where we increase public access
00:30to the academic study of the Bible and religion, and we combat the spread of misinformation
00:36about the same.
00:37How are things today, Dan?
00:38Things are great.
00:39It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood.
00:41That it is.
00:42And we get to learn some interesting stuff, so I'm kind of excited to talk about it.
00:50Oh, well...
00:51I just thought of this.
00:52Sorry to interrupt, but I thought it would be fun to bring up here.
00:56I have received two very cool pieces of news over the last two days.
01:02The first one was, "The other day, the Society of Biblical Literature sent out its annual
01:06Society Report."
01:08And there was an article that was a spotlight on my work, and the article's title was "Stitch
01:15Incoming."
01:16Yes.
01:17I saw that.
01:18And I remember doing this interview a few weeks ago.
01:22It was a fun interview.
01:23I really thought that article was fun.
01:24But then this morning, I got an email from somebody's name I didn't recognize.
01:29But he's like, "Hey, I'm the editor of Biblical Theology Review."
01:34And I was like, "Oh, I recognize that journal."
01:37And he's like, "Just wanted to let you know we're about to release this new issue."
01:40I attached a PDF of it for you, but the essay that I have introducing the issue all about
01:47public scholarship uses you as the model for what public biblical scholarship could look
01:53like.
01:55And I was like, "What?"
01:58So I thought that was really cool.
01:59So I'm not trying to toot my own horn or anything, but--
02:02Oh, no.
02:03Toot away.
02:04Toot away.
02:05But I got some pretty cool pieces of news.
02:07So I was really excited about both those things.
02:09I think that's really cool.
02:11Yeah.
02:12I love it.
02:13I love it.
02:14Yeah.
02:15I've managed to deceive everyone into thinking I'm an actual scholar, but I cannot, apart
02:20from a handful of dudes on social media.
02:23I was going to say, not quite everybody.
02:25Not quite everybody.
02:26Yeah, yeah.
02:27Some of them have me pegged.
02:30I'm a fake scholar from head to toe.
02:34But speaking of dudes--
02:35I mean, we don't even know if those diplomas that you've shown everybody are even real.
02:41I could print up a diploma.
02:44You can evidently just pay somebody to send you a fake one according to some guy on
02:49Instagram who has a pseudonym and has a picture of an eagle in an American flag or something
02:58in their profile photo.
03:00Well, listen.
03:01I can just Photoshop a thing that says that I've got a degree from Oxford.
03:05That's not hard.
03:07But it's embossed.
03:08It's got--
03:09There's gold love.
03:10Well, then there's no way I can do it.
03:12No, I'm out of luck.
03:14Yeah.
03:15Getting myself onto their website would be a harder thing to do.
03:18I will say that.
03:19All right.
03:20Let's dive in here.
03:21We've got two interesting topics that are kind of related to each other that we're going
03:26to go through.
03:27Little and related, yes.
03:29In the first one, we're going to be talking about Jesus and a trip he may or may not have
03:37made right after he died.
03:40Yes.
03:41So we're going to see if Jesus actually descended into hell.
03:46Or in the Pismo Beach.
03:47Or-- Yeah, any place.
03:51We'll see where he went.
03:53Probably in Santorini, I'm going to guess.
03:55It seems like a nice place.
03:58And then in the second half of the show, we are going to talk about hell in a different
04:03way.
04:04We're going to talk about revelation and the hell that it describes.
04:10So we're going to have a lot of fun with this one.
04:14We didn't stop to think about what we would name either of these segments.
04:17So let's just-- Yes.
04:18That's true.
04:19So that's fine.
04:21We're just going to go with-- we're just going to go with here we go.
04:24So here we go.
04:25Here's the first segment.
04:28All right, so this started because I was looking for interesting topics for us to talk about.
04:39And I stumbled on an article on a website called gotquestions.org.
04:46Your questions, biblical answers.
04:48Yes, they do have that tagline.
04:51And I was sort of mystified by the question that is the question from the got questions.
05:01Because it was something I had never heard of before.
05:03Okay.
05:04But I think a lot of people have.
05:06I was just-- I was not raised with this tradition.
05:10And the question is, did Jesus go to hell between his death and resurrection?
05:19So yeah, I was a little baffled.
05:24I was befuddled by this.
05:28Let's talk about-- first of all, so the article itself mentions that this idea sort of cropped
05:35up quick, at least like one of the earliest references we have is from what's called the
05:40Apostles Creed, which I can't hear without thinking of Apollo Creed, but I know that
05:45that's different.
05:46Well, every time I hear it, I think this is some role-playing video game.
05:52Yes, exactly.
05:55It's neither of those things.
05:56It's neither a boxer nor a role-playing video game.
06:00It is a fifth century, is that what we decided?
06:10It's a Latin declaration of a creed, which is just sort of an I believe statement, right?
06:19Yeah.
06:20Yeah.
06:21So this is in order to demonstrate your fidelity to the faith, this particular group you had
06:28to be willing to declare this creed, and then also it was something that would be repeated
06:34quite regularly.
06:35Yeah, I found versions or I found the Apostles Creed listed on websites for both the Church
06:42of England and I think the Catholic Church.
06:45So it's still very much in circulation as a sort of an article of faith.
06:54And one of the lines in it says, it starts with the standard sort of I believe in God,
07:02the father almighty creator of heaven and earth.
07:05Then it goes to I believe in Jesus Christ, his only son, dot, dot, dot, blah, blah.
07:11And then it gets to was crucified, died and was buried.
07:17He descended to the dead.
07:19Oh, no.
07:20Oh, I'm on the Church of England one, and it doesn't say he descended to hell.
07:24The other one.
07:25I got a different one.
07:26Oh, come on.
07:27I'm on the wrong one.
07:29Many of them say he descended into hell.
07:31Yes.
07:32And then rose again from the dead on the third day rose again from from the dead on the third
07:36day.
07:37And that Latin is Descendit ad inferno in pharaohs, which I don't know.
07:46I got no Latin.
07:47So I assume the inferno, yeah, so yeah, which is a prototypically associated quite directly
07:56with hell.
07:57Right.
07:58And it looks like this is a variation on something called the old Roman symbol or the old Roman
08:01creed, which was an earlier and shorter version that might go back to the second century.
08:06Okay.
08:07And that that version says who under Pontius Pilate was crucified and buried on the third
08:11day rose again from the dead ascended to heaven sits at the right hand of the father and thus
08:15and so.
08:16Oh, that the the descended into hell may have been inserted into this creed at some point
08:22between the second and fourth or fifth century.
08:26Okay.
08:27So, okay.
08:28So that's what a fascinating thing to just shove in there in the middle.
08:33Do we have a sense of where that came from?
08:35Why that cropped up like?
08:38Is it biblical?
08:39Does it come from the book itself?
08:41Well, I think the the clearest reference to this and this is something where we see this
08:47interpretation quite early, it comes from first Peter 3 18.
08:51Now first Peter is probably early second century CE, maybe first quarter, maybe second quarter.
08:57So second Peter is probably somewhere between 120 to 150 CE first Peter, it might be a little
09:02earlier than that.
09:04But in first Peter 3 18, we have this statement for Christ also suffered for sins once for
09:09all the righteous for the unrighteous in order to bring you to God.
09:14He was put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit.
09:17And then verse 19 in which also so in the spirit, he went and made a proclamation to the spirits
09:25in prison who in former times did not obey when God waited patiently in the days of Noah
09:31during the building of the ark in which a few that is eight lives were saved through water.
09:37And so we got a pretty peculiar little reference to Jesus in the spirit proclaiming something
09:48yeah to some spirits that are in prison.
09:52And there are a few different interpretations of this, but the the got questions article
09:59that you have goes through and makes a pretty interesting little play at trying to renegotiate
10:09what's going on here and concludes, did Jesus go to hell?
10:13No.
10:14He went to shaol/hades, which which we might we might be like that sounds like a distinction
10:21without a difference got questions.org.
10:24What's going on here?
10:26So we did a whole show about hell and shaol and Hades, but give us a little refresher.
10:36Just a quick refresher on what we're talking about when we say those words.
10:41So in the Hebrew Bible, you have no concept of hell as we understand it.
10:47You have shaol.
10:48And in the King James version, that is translated as hell every single time, but shaol is a reference
10:53to the grave and the abode of all the dead, because in prior to basically Greco-Roman
11:00period Judaism, good bad indifferent somewhere in between everybody went to the same place
11:07after you died.
11:08It was this murky existence in the underworld that was inhabited by questionable creatures
11:15and your relationship with the living was unclear.
11:19But in the way they buried people seemed to suggest they thought their existence continued
11:24on in some sense and that there was even communion and communication that was possible back and
11:31forth across that divide.
11:35But shaol is just the abode of all the dead that was located in the underworld.
11:40And then with the the anochic literature, first Enoch Jubilees, other related traditions
11:46that are part of these texts that were written in Greco-Roman period Judaism, you have this
11:50development of different places where people went after death based on their behavior in
11:56life.
11:57And this primarily arises in the Persian and Greco-Roman periods as Jewish thinkers are
12:04kind of contemplating the problem of evil and going, Hey, a lot of good people are suffering
12:10are people persecution oppression and they are dying and we're not seeing them receive
12:18any kind of justice from God.
12:20Where is God's justice for the righteous?
12:22And then they're also seeing phenomenally wicked people, the people responsible for the
12:27oppression and the persecution and things like that.
12:29And they're saying, Hey, they're not getting their just desserts either.
12:33What's going on here?
12:34And maybe it's in the afterlife that folks are getting their recompense whether for good
12:41or for bad.
12:42And so in the anochic literature, you have ideas, particularly of the disobedient angels.
12:48First Enoch is in some sense kind of fan fiction for Genesis six, and it's extrapolating from
12:54that this idea that these angels who descended and and had offspring with human women and
12:58introduced the evils of warfare and makeup and everything like that, they for for their
13:05goal in evils of warfare and makeup.
13:09The list is to warfare makeup and and you know, they're imprisoned in a part of this
13:16kind of eschatological landscape.
13:18And then you also have these smooth places where you know, the righteous people are waiting
13:24and then you've got the unrighteous people who did not receive any judgment in life.
13:28And then you've got another smooth place where the unrighteous people who did get judged
13:33during life, they go to await their judgment or their allocation of some kind of final
13:40place where they're going to be either destroyed or punished or whatever.
13:45And so you you have ideas about different levels of the afterlife in the anochic literature.
13:49And then we get into the New Testament and we've got three Greek words that are used
13:54to refer to some kind of place of postmortem divine punishment.
14:00You've got oddies or Hades, which is clearly borrowed from Greek, which is kind of is very
14:05similar to all it's the abode of all the dead, but then you have, you know, Hades is subletted.
14:11You've got Tartarus is the place where the bad people go to get punished and you know,
14:17that's where you don't want to end up. And Tartarus occurs once in the New Testament in
14:22the book of one of the two letters of Peter. And then the other word is Ghana or Gehenna,
14:28which is a Greek transliteration of the Valley of Hinnom, which is became symbolically associated
14:35with evil and became this eschatological place where the the bodies of the wicked are going
14:42to be stacked. And and that's where we get this idea that there's this fire that never
14:46dies and the fire is never quenched and the worm never dies. And originally the idea was,
14:53there are always new bodies being heaped into the pile so that the fire never runs out
14:58of fuel and the worms never run out of food. But then later that gets reinterpreted to mean
15:03if you go there, the fire will burn you and will never go away and the worms will eat
15:08a chew and they will never go away. And so right. So these things are all changing the
15:13concept of the afterlife and punishment in the afterlife is constantly changing. And
15:18so what this article is trying to do is trying to weave it all together into this rich tapestry
15:25of something that we can just pretend has a plausible case for being consistent. And
15:33and that's where we're going to get through this. No, no, he didn't go to hell argument
15:38because they want to suggest that Hades and shawl need to be equated. Right. And both
15:43of those are the temporary dwelling place for all of the dead. And then the idea is that
15:51this they talk about in Revelation 20 11 through 15 and we're going to talk about those passages
15:56in the next part makes a clear distinction between Hades and the lake of fire. And so
16:04they're suggesting Hades and the lake of fire are not one and the same. So the lake of fire
16:09is not in Hades, but Hades is going to get chucked into the lake of fire. We'll get to
16:16that later. We'll get to the yeah, we get to the chucking of Hades. So you know, it's
16:21it's like a fire adjacent though. I think we can safely say it might not be there. But
16:26like, you know, it overlooks it. You've got a view. If you get, you know, if you're in
16:30a penthouse in Hades, you're going to be able to see the lake of fire and they say that
16:37shawl slash Hades is a realm with two divisions, a place of blessing and a place of judgment.
16:44And so that's where they're going to tie in Lazarus and the rich man is parable about
16:48how Lazarus dies and he goes off to the bosom of Abraham. And then the rich man is down
16:53and being tormented and just as begging Lazarus to to let some water drip off his fingers into
17:00his mouth so he can be he can be satisfied. And so we're what is fundamentally a a diachronic
17:10difference. Diachronic means through time. And so in other words, the ideas are changing
17:15as time goes on. Right. But because we were preserving the text from earlier, we get all
17:21of the ideas and got questions is trying to collapse that diachronic difference and smoosh
17:27it all together and say, no, it's all perfectly consistent with everything else. And what
17:34they come up with is that shawl slash Hades is this temporary place where you have the
17:40two different divisions. And then hell is not let's see, hell is so they say the hell
17:49is not a correct translation of a bunch of things. Today, you will be with me in paradise
17:55Luke 2343. He did not say I will see you in hell. That would be a weird thing for Jesus
18:02to kind of be so much better though, if Jesus turns to the guy on the other cross goes,
18:09I'll see you in hell. That I would love to have seen William Defoe look over and just
18:15glaringly say, I'll see you in hell. Oh, no, he said today you will be with me in paradise.
18:24So yes, so paradise must be the division that has blessings in shawl slash Hades. So one
18:33problem with that claim is that just because Jesus said, I'll see you today in paradise,
18:40doesn't mean he didn't also then go to hell. He's like, I got a four o'clock in three days.
18:47He can he can boogie around all of the afterlife. He can check everything out. I don't know.
18:52That's not including travel. So what they're basically saying here is there's shawl slash
19:03Hades and there's a good side and a bad side. Yeah. And then there's there's hell and Jesus
19:09did not go to hell, but we got this this thing about Jesus preaching to the spirits in prison.
19:16Yeah. So what's going on there? And so we've got two other articles on got questions.org.
19:21Okay. One is one is who were the spirits in prison? So we're talking about first Peter
19:27three 18 through 20. And and here they give a few different options. Number one, the spirits
19:34in prison are fallen angels or demons. And this is an idea that is based on again, first
19:42Enoch, the Enochic literature, because one of the things it talks about is how the these
19:46angels are going to be punished. In fact, I'll read a tiny bit from first Enoch chapter
19:5310. We've got after the the angels have done all these, these naughty things. God is like,
20:02commission some angels. So in chapter 10, then the most high declared and the great Holy
20:06one spoke and he sent Sariel, who's Canadian, Soriel, to the son of Lomax saying, go to
20:14Noah and say to him in my name, hide yourself and reveal to him that the end is coming that
20:17the whole earth will perish. And then he commissions Raphael says to Raphael, he said, go Raphael
20:26and bind us, I'll hand and foot and cast him into the darkness and make an opening in the
20:31wilderness that is in duodyle, throw him there and lay beneath him sharp and jagged stones
20:37cover him with darkness and let him dwell there for an exceedingly long time. So yeah,
20:45and then use those size that I don't know how to use. And then we've got the later on
20:52in chapter 21 from there. So now we've got Enoch is actually being given a tour of this
20:58eschatological hellscape. From there, I traveled to another place more terrible than this one.
21:03And I saw terrible things, a great fire burning and flaming there. And the place had a narrow
21:08cleft extending to the abyss full of great pillars of fire born downward. Neither the
21:13measure nor the size was I able to see or to estimate. And I said, how terrible is this
21:18place and fearful to look at? And Uriel answered me one of the holy angels who was with me and
21:22said to me, Enoch, why are you so frightened and shaken? And I replied because of this
21:26terrible place because of the fearful sight. And he said, this is a prison for the angels.
21:31Here they will be confined forever. So it certainly seems like first Peter three is riffing on
21:40this anarchic idea of these spirits in prison. And maybe it's it's the angels. And so why
21:47is Jesus preaching to them? Like there are a few different thoughts. One is that he's
21:51basically going, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah.
21:56We won more preaching at them than two. Yeah, yeah, more a victory lap. Another idea is
22:03that maybe they thought that the angels could repent and then they would be saved. They
22:08would be let out of this prison. That's a possibility. Another understanding is that
22:14the spirits in prison are the and here I'm reading from the got questions article again,
22:19the spirits in prison are the human spirits of those who perished in the flood of Noah's
22:23day. As for Christ preaching to them, there are three possible interpretations. One, Christ
22:30preached to them figuratively in and through Noah while they were in the flesh. So that's
22:35where Jesus is the puppet master and Noah who is preaching is and and this is kind of
22:41a goofy reading of this Christ in the spirit preach to the spirits in prison really means
22:46that Christ manipulated Noah like a little hand puppet to preach to the people who rejected
22:53him. That doesn't make much sense. B, Christ preached to them literally being present with
22:58Noah through the Holy Spirit who inspired Noah to proclaim the message of coming judgment.
23:02In other words, the pre mortal pre incarnate Jesus was there in spirits directly preaching
23:09to them and C, Christ preached to them literally in between his death and resurrection. And
23:14the article doesn't actually decide which of these is right, but it does, but it does
23:21conclude this way. According to each of these interpretations, the spirits are called such
23:26because they existed in a spiritual condition when Peter wrote, they were no longer in the
23:30flesh, but lived in Hades slash hell. So in the previous article, it was their shawl slash
23:44Hades. And that's different from hell. Here it's they were in Hades slash hell. So depending
23:50on which interpretation you prefer, one of them is that Jesus preached to the spirits
23:55that were in slady, slady's, slady's hash well, Hades slash hell. Yeah. So and then and
24:02then the other are both these are both articles from got questions.org. So both of them from
24:07got questions.org. And I'm just curious. If we got more questions, thanks got questions.
24:15Yeah. So the did Jesus go to hell between his death and resurrection is a part of you
24:20go to the content index, you go to Jesus Christ, you go to the cross in the empty tomb.
24:24Yeah. And then the who were the spirits in prison, you got to go to content index books
24:29of the Bible first Peter. But then you can also through Jesus Christ, the cross in the
24:33empty tomb, get to the question where was Jesus for the three days between his death
24:37and resurrection? Sure. We got a third take on this thing. Yes. And and here we have the
24:45exact same Hades slash hell take. Okay. Yeah. Exactly. Same as which as the the second.
24:54So remember, you got a show equals hell. Right. You got show all slash Hades does not equal
25:01hell. Right. And then you've got Hades slash hell. And now we're going to do another Hades
25:08slash hell. So at the very end, we have, um, but they're kind of a, again, they're playing
25:18with different interpretations. There's another interpretation of the first Peter passage in
25:21this interpretation that people, the spirits are people currently in hell. But Peter is
25:25not saying that Jesus made a special trip to Hades slash hell to preach or proclaim anything.
25:32Rather Peter is giving parenthetical information about something Jesus had done previously in
25:36history, namely that he had in spirit, preached to the people in Noah's day while they were
25:40still living on earth. So it's still toying with these different interpretations, but
25:44ultimately identifies these spirits in prison as being in Hades slash hell and that it concludes
25:50the only thing we know for sure. Because definitely we know something for sure here is that according
25:57to Jesus's own words on the cross, he went to paradise. We can also say with confidence
26:03that his work of redemption finished, Jesus did not have to suffer in hell.
26:09Okay. Little, a little noncommittal. It certainly seems like Jesus would have been able to visit
26:18without suffering. Yeah, particularly if he's there in a preaching capacity, you know, he
26:25can buzz the guards at any moment and he's sort of as a doctors without borders, sort
26:31of visit. Yeah, yeah. So, but I'm going to go back a bit to the first Peter passage because
26:39the, so the got questions people there, they're, you know, Christian apologists, they're trying
26:44to provide a unifying framework for everything. You know, is not all that unifying. You know,
26:49you can't be consistent all the time when you're trying to assert that the Bible is consistent
26:53all the time. So sometimes shole and Hades are not hell. Sometimes Hades is hell. But
27:00the scholarship identifies some, some closely overlapping interpretations. And there's a
27:06wonderful new commentary, multi volume commentary on first Peter from the International Critical
27:15commentary series. And talking about this, they say one theory, which can be traced as
27:19far back as the second century. And we have this view attested in Alexandria maintains
27:26that between his death and resurrection, traditionally known as the Triduum mortis, the immaterial
27:31soul of Christ went to the underworld where he preached to the souls of dead humans. So
27:37according to this critical commentary, about the earliest interpretation we have is the
27:42notion that Jesus went to hell and preached to the souls of dead humans. Within this group,
27:49proponents are divided over what was preached and the group to whom the message was directed,
27:53the vast majority maintain that Christ proclaimed a message of salvation to the generation of
27:58Noah that perished in the flood, although other recipients have also been posited. And
28:04then another interpretation that extends back to the time of Augustine or Augustine, if you're
28:11nasty. This theory arose out of a question posed to Augustine by Uodius, a friend and
28:18fellow Bishop, noting that the passage seemed to refer to Christ proclamation of the gospel
28:23in Hades, which it was assumed would have therefore been empty to all of its inhabitants.
28:27Uodius asked for Augustine's interpretation. And what he said was, if the Lord, when he
28:32died, preached in hell to spirits in prison, why were those who continued on believing while
28:37the arc was a preparing, the only ones counted worthy of this favor, namely the Lord's descending
28:42in hell. From the ages between the time of Noah and the passion of Christ, there died
28:46many thousands or so many nations whom he might have found in hell. Or if he preached
28:51at all, why has Peter mentioned only these and passed over the innumerable multitudes
28:55of others? And so what he decided was that this wasn't a universal thing. This was the
29:05idea was that the pnevmata, the spiritual preaching might refer to human beings who received the
29:11message of the gospel during their lifetimes. More specifically, he suggested that during
29:16the time when the arc was being constructed, the preexisting Christ preached a message of
29:20salvation through Noah. So we got that puppet master theory. Yeah, there we go. Basically.
29:25And then the third theory that's mentioned in the commentary is one that has become quite
29:29popular in more recent scholarships since the rediscovery of first Enoch. The idea is that
29:36maybe these are the angels that were disobedience. And the commentary doesn't really say we like
29:45this option, but does suggest that a lot of critical scholars these days are leaning in
29:50the direction of understanding Peter to be referring to the angels. And I think there's
29:55sense to be made of that. But again, it's certainly not the earliest interpretation.
30:01And I think it kind of complicates whatever got questions.org is trying to do with their
30:08inconsistent little reconstruction of of what these terms all refer to. I mean, I think the
30:14point here, which is the point commonly with these sorts of things with whenever we have,
30:21you know, whenever there's something like this, like this, you know, this thing in Peter
30:26where it's like, what was he doing? We still have the question. Like it's just going to
30:32be a question perpetually. Because there's because there is no obvious answer. And all
30:37of these theories are fine and interesting and valid and also unverifiable and completely
30:46guesswork. You know what I mean? Like it's, it's, you know, educated guesswork. But I think
30:54that the the the real answer is not to have an answer, right? Like the real the correct
31:01answer to this is, huh? Sure. Maybe we do. We don't know. We don't know what what a lot
31:10of it meant. So so have fun with it. I don't know. Yeah. Well, and that that's something
31:17I've said an awful lot on on my own channels that, you know, as long as you're if you're
31:24looking at this critically, and as long as you're making a good faith effort to try to understand
31:29what was going on for these people on their own terms, then as far as I'm concerned,
31:33that's a great foundation for doing whatever else. But you know, just being transparent
31:38about the fact that, you know, at this point, we're just speculating. We don't really know.
31:43We've we're making some educated observations, but that doesn't definitively answer the question.
31:50Because yeah, most of the folks who need a definitive answer need it because, you know,
31:56either there is social or actual capital at stake that they are trying to irrigate. Or
32:06because they're their own identity politics demand that they have some kind of confident
32:11answer. And and they can't shy away from that. And got questions seems to be going from doing
32:19both sides of that, because in one article, it's like, definitely not that. And then another
32:23article, it's like, it could be that. Yeah. All right. Well, I think that's great. We we still
32:29have questions got questions dot org. So we're they've got other questions on this too. I just
32:34looked at a related question and says, what is the harrowing of hell? And the harrowing of hell is
32:38the tradition about Jesus going down, okay, between his death and resurrection and emptying
32:45hell. And there are famous paintings from the Byzantine period of of Jesus coming out of a cave
32:51basically. And there are some door panels that are broken on the ground. And that's and that is
32:56representative of the harrowing of hell. Go you're free everyone out. Let's let's go.
33:01Interesting. All right. Well, speaking of hell, let's let's move on to our next segment segment
33:11number two. And in this segment, we're going to be talking about revelation.
33:21And you book of revelation, the book of John, yes. Yeah, not not the not the concept of
33:27revelation, but but the book that bears its name. Yes. And I am interested in this because because
33:35yeah, we sort of teased a little bit of what's going to happen in terms of things getting thrown
33:41into lakes of fire, but talk about how revelations hell might differ from the concepts of hell that
33:47we've already talked about or or add their unto. Well, we got the main term that is used here in
33:56the book of Revelation is Hades for hell. Okay. And hang on, just a second, I want to see how
34:03many times this word occurs in the book of Revelation. So I'm just going to do a quick search for the
34:11occurrence of this term in the book of Revelation occurs four times. Okay, we see it in Revelation
34:16118, Revelation six, eight, Revelation, 2013 and Revelation 2014. And so I'm the we're looking really
34:24at Revelation 20 versus 11 through 15. And in all of the other occurrences, Hades is associated with
34:33death. It occurs in a pair death and Hades, death and Hades. Okay. And in Revelation 118,
34:42you have Jesus appearing to John where he's, you know, in the spirit quote, unquote, on on the
34:49Lord's day and sees Jesus and Jesus says, I am alive forevermore, amen, and have the keys of death
34:57and of Hades. The idea seems to be that death and Hades are locations, prisons, places where
35:03people are confined, but he's got the keys. He's got the way to unlock this location. But then
35:11when we get to Revelation six, eight, we've got a personification of the two. And I looked,
35:16there was a pale green horse. Its writer's name was death and Hades followed with him.
35:22And they were given authority over a fourth of the earth to kill the sword with sword and famine
35:27and pestilence and by the wild animals of the earth. So it's like a superhero sidekick situation.
35:33Yeah. And so they're personified. In one, they're a place and there's a lock on them.
35:38In another, they're these personified horsemen. And then we get to Revelation 2013 and 14. And then
35:47it's kind of back to being a place because John says, I saw a great white throne and the one who
35:52sat on it, the earth and the heaven fled from his presence. And no place was found for them.
35:57So here we're getting metaphorical again, heaven and earth are like, yeah, and runoff.
36:03And can't find a place to hide evidently. And I saw the dead great and small standing before the
36:09throne and books were opened. Also, another book was opened. The book of life and the dead were judged
36:14according to their works as recorded in the books. And then we have, and the sea gave up the dead
36:21who were in it. Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them. Okay. And all were judged according
36:29to what they had done. So it sounds like all the dead, wherever they're hiding, it's an Ali Ali
36:35oxen free. Everybody come forth from wherever. So you know, we've got our pirates of the Caribbean,
36:42all your shell encrusted people are coming up from the sea and marching out and death and Hades
36:49give up their dead as well. And then so we've had this lake of fire that is associated with
36:58with this place of punishment with Satan and all this and and Satan and the false prophets get
37:02tossed into the lake of fire where where they will be tormented forever. And then after we after
37:08death and Hades give up their debt, it says then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire.
37:15Oh, wow. Okay. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And anyone whose name was not found
37:22written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire. And so there's some inconsistencies
37:29here as well. We've already seen a personified and a non personified representation of this pair
37:35death and Hades. And now we seem to be back to the non personified. They're a place they they have
37:40the dead inhabiting them and they give them up. And then they get yeeted into the lake of fire,
37:48which is the second death, but is also supposed to be like eternally tormenting folks. So I we
37:56seem to be going back and forth between this eternal conscious torment and annihilationism
38:02because death and Hades are not represented as personifications here. And even if they were,
38:08that would just be metaphorical. Like somebody was trying to tell me, no, no, they're personified.
38:13So obviously they're going to be tortured forever. It's like, what sense does it make
38:17to have these places personified and then say, and then we're going to torture the personification
38:25of the place. Just to be mean. Yeah, it's like, what do they do? That looks like a nice place.
38:31I'm going to I'm going to turn it into a person and then torture it forever.
38:35Yeah, like they didn't do anything wrong. So it doesn't make sense that that death and Hades are
38:40going to be eternally tortured. It makes a lot more sense to suggest, hey, remember those places
38:47death and Hades? The places where people go after they die? No more death. No more need for them.
38:53Right. Therefore, they're being destroyed. They're being annihilated. Death and hell poof are going away.
39:06As a metaphor, it makes a lot of sense to say this, you know, what what Jesus has done or what God is
39:14doing is is now sort of getting rid of the concept of death and Hades and whatever. Like you can,
39:25you can let go of those ideas. Let's just throw them into the, the infernator and
39:33yeet them into the sun because, you know, this is not something that's going to happen anymore.
39:39People are not going to die anymore. We don't need a location to store to house the dead because
39:47they've all been given up to be judged and then they're going, they have elsewhere to be.
39:52And so even if you do want to understand them as being personified in some sense, I think the notion
39:58that that, you know, the personified death is going in a lake of fire for eternity. Like who?
40:06I don't know anybody who's going to get their jollies off of that. And if you are, you're messed
40:12up. Yeah. And also just the concept of death as like if the idea here is the concept of death as
40:22we understand it. I mean, I guess, I guess we've already established that in this case, it's not
40:27death as we understand it is death as a place. I'm wrapping my head around it. I'm working on it,
40:33but like, so it's not, so we're not talking about death as in the end of human life or the end of
40:40life. We're talking about death as the place that a person, a spirit would go after their die.
40:48Well, and that's, and that's Hades because when you look at ancient mythology, it's not like,
40:54you know, death is not this abstract thing. Death is actually journeying to the underworld.
41:01So it is a, it is a place. And we tend to think of it in more slightly more scientific kind of
41:09biological terms. But recently, there were a lot more things that were, that were oriented along
41:15like a, a source path goal kind of metaphor, or an inside outside or a directional metaphor,
41:25like the concept of truth, we talk about truth is a thing. You have the truth, you can find the
41:31truth, you hide the truth, you can give it in parts, in halves, in holes. Truth is a thing.
41:37In the Bible, when in particularly in the New Testament, but also to some degree in the Hebrew
41:43Bible, you, truth is a path. You walk in truth, you depart from the truth, you return to the truth.
41:50And so you've got to think about truth more as a path that is representative of behavior.
41:58And so similarly, you've got to think about death, not as a change of condition, but a change of
42:05location. And so that's why death is represented as a, a location here. And I wanted to read from
42:13my favorite commentary on the book of Revelation is from the anchor Yale Bible commentary series.
42:22And Kester is the author K-O-E-S-T-E-R of the, the revelation volume that was published in 2014.
42:30And let me just find where it talks about this. The final judgment ends the work of death and
42:39Hades. They are sometimes pictured as places that can be locked or opened with a key as we saw in
42:45Revelation 118. And they are also depicted as sinister beings that hold people captive as we saw
42:51in Revelation 6, 8. Before the judgment, they quote, unquote, give up their dead,
42:56which means they have no absolute right over people. They do God's bidding by relinquishing those
43:01they hold. Then God deals with them as he dealt with the beast, false prophet, and Satan by throwing
43:06them into the lake of fire. The end of death is the counterpart to resurrection as God brings
43:11the dead to life. He also terminates death's power to hold anyone captive in the new Jerusalem
43:17death has no place. So even here, the focus is not on let's torment this guy forever. The focus is on
43:26the influences over, the presence is over, the role of that thing is over. Judgment ends with
43:34the opponents of God in the lake of fire, which is also called the second death. Revelation refrains
43:39from using terms like physical death and spiritual death and assumes that both death and resurrection
43:44affect the whole person. Ordinary death affects both the righteous and the wicked, whereas the
43:48second death afflicts only those condemned by God. Yeah, there you go. Conversely, those allied
43:59with evil may now elude condemnation, but their future is the second death in the lake of fire,
44:03along with Satan, the beast, the false, false prophet death and Hades, John's visions,
44:08disclose the divergent outcomes of relationships with God and God's adversaries. And then he goes
44:15on to talk about how some people argue that revelation depicts condemnation as annihilation
44:19rather than ongoing suffering. But one can imagine a political system and death coming to an end,
44:27but it is hard to see how they could suffer torment. Yeah. Right. That is it. Yeah, it's a very odd
44:35thing. Yeah. So it's, it's the, I think the problem is we want this to be a rich, unified tapestry
44:46that this all fits together and that it all makes sense as, as if it is some vision of things that
44:52are going to take place in the future when really it's just a jumbled up collection of apocalyptic
44:57imagery. And I don't think the author is like, Oh, wait a minute, I got to change that to make it
45:03consistent because I did the thing over here. Now we, now it all flows together. I think the
45:08author was like, ah, and then this, and then this, because the idea is just
45:12John the revelator has a very, a very sort of beat Nick sensibility. It's, it's, it's, it's
45:20almost a gonzo journalism. What's his name thing? Yeah. You know who I'm talking about. Anyway,
45:27yeah, it's, it's, it, he flows. He doesn't, he doesn't go back and revise. He's, he's, he's not
45:33heavy into editing. He's just, uh, whatever's coming out is coming out. Sort of, sort of dude,
45:39which, which I think, um, makes it a problem when we have people today in, in our modern world who
45:46try to create this, this unifying framework that gives everything a place and everything
45:54fits together as with gut questions.org and everybody else who wants revelation, you know,
46:01who's every, every time there's a car accident, somebody's like, ah, this is the, this is the
46:06beast from, uh, from revelation and somebody was like the, the trains that were derailing
46:12ago. They were like, ah, this is, this is the, uh, the, the serpent with the, with the tail,
46:18like a scorpion from, from this part of, of revelation, because they think this is actually,
46:23some kind of prophecy about things that are going to happen in the future.
46:26It's really just scary story time. Yeah. Like when, when you're taking it literally,
46:31very much to my, to my mind, misses the point. Like you literally, if you try to take it as, uh,
46:40as these are literal things that I'm predicting are literally going to happen
46:45and look the way I'm describing them, you, you miss everything that he's trying to say in it.
46:52Now I, yeah, I think a lot of what he's trying to say is nutballs myself. I think you might,
46:58I think you might have been a little bit goofy, but if you want to understand it, if you want to
47:04understand what he was trying to say, taking it literally is not going to get you anywhere near
47:10it. It's going to, it's just, I mean, it's, it's, uh, it's very clearly metaphor. The guy can't even
47:16decide whether, whether some, whether two things are a place or people. And like, like, yeah, that,
47:23that to me is, is plenty to just say, let's look at this as a metaphor. Let's, let's chill out a
47:29little bit with the, uh, with the literal. And, and I think the reason there are so many people who
47:33are just allergic to recognizing that fact is, is because they want to try to make the text as useful
47:38as, and meaningful as possible to them. And right now there's an awful lot of utility
47:44in you, in, in mapping whatever's in the text onto current events so that we can pretend we have any
47:52as some kind of insight into what's coming next. And, and that is horrifically dangerous when on a
48:00geopolitical level, we have bad actors who are trying to represent genocide as something not only
48:10that is prophesied to happen in the future, but that is something they should be excited about.
48:15Like the, there's the dehumanization that results from gleefully anticipating war and genocide,
48:26because it means you're finally going to feel vindicated about believing in this stuff.
48:31Right. And, and, and it means that if it happens, then Jesus's return must be right around the
48:37corner or whatever. And who knows how lucky we are to live in this generation. And, and who knows
48:43how many people have their fingers on levers of power that are going to use them because they think
48:50they are going to facilitate that, that lucky, lucky event that, that we all get to be a part of.
48:58Just, just seeing the number of people who are like, what Trump said about Gaza. Oh yeah,
49:07it's happening. It's happening. Everybody get ready. Like that's, that is scary, scary delusion.
49:14Well, and not, it's also important to note that like that's something that has been happening
49:21for centuries. Yeah. Like over and over again, people are like, aha, look at this. See, we're in
49:27the last days here in 1666. It's look at this, you know, the, the, the London fire proves that
49:34we are in the final days or, you know, the plague is one of the things like this is, this is not new.
49:40And yeah, they've been wrong every time up till now. I don't know why you think you're the right
49:45one when everybody else has been wrong every time they've made these predictions about we are the
49:50ones who are finally going to see, you know, revolution, revelation come to life. Yeah.
49:58Yeah. And, and something I've mentioned in, in a lot of videos, revelation is late first century
50:04CE Jewish apocalyptic imagery written by followers of Jesus. And it has nothing to do with anything
50:12that happened after the text was written. Right. And, and oh my gosh, the heartache, the suffering,
50:19the literal human lives lost needlessly, because people tried to use this as a map for the future.
50:29Just please give it a rest for the sake. Well, and also not, not for nothing, but like,
50:36there was much there wasn't their hemming and hawing about whether to even include it in the
50:41canon, like revelation only made it barely in under the wire. Right. Yeah. Mainly because of
50:47Athanasius of Alexandria, who thought it was a useful rhetorical bludgeon against his enemies
50:53within the Christian community, because the earliest Christians were like, who's this John
51:00dude? He was up in the night. What was he smoking? Was he in a cave? What was happening here?
51:07But you had, you had folks who were like, I think Justin Martyr around 150 to 160 was the first to
51:14say, Hey, I bet this was the same John that wrote the gospel of John. And, um, and other people were
51:21like, can you read Justin? Like this guy's Greek is awful. This is, this is not the same author.
51:29And, uh, and so you had Christians who were denying that this was John the, or this was John the
51:35beloved, uh, disciple. You had a bunch of them that were pointing out there's no revelation in here.
51:41This is just bizarre grotesque imagery. This is not uplifting. This is not the gospel. And you,
51:48and as we talked with Bart Erman about this as well, you had all this excess. It wasn't about
51:53dismantling these oppressive systems of power. It was about trading places with the people who were
51:59in the driver's seat and so that we could be the ones now to, uh, uh, you know, to laugh maniacally
52:06as other people were, uh, were being mown down. Uh, and so that a lot of people are like,
52:12that's not my Christianity in, in the early centuries. And yeah, it took a while. It took, uh,
52:18Athanasius of Alexandria to write his festival letter and, uh, and tie his little cannon off with a,
52:26the bow that is the book of Revelation and then stealing a page from the book of Revelation.
52:31He closed out his, uh, his cannon list by saying, uh, curses anybody who adds to or takes away from,
52:38from these. Uh, so yeah, it's, it's a mess. But, uh, I think, and, and I think,
52:44let's see, I'm trying to think of which who omitted it from their cannons. There were,
52:50there were a few people, but I think it wasn't even till, uh, like the council of Trent that it was
52:56formally recognized as canonical by, uh, the Catholic church. I may have to revisit that.
53:02I don't know if that's true, but yeah, there's, it was not popular for, um, the earliest
53:09generations of Christians because it conflicted with what they, what they were seeing in the
53:15gospels and, uh, and what they wanted to get out of Christianity. Darn you, Athanasius,
53:20we could have saved us all a big headache if you were just, uh, yeah. All right. Countless,
53:26countless lives. Yeah. Yeah. All right. Well, uh, thank you for that. I think that is
53:33fascinating. Uh, and if you friends listening or viewing at home decided that you think it's
53:40fascinating and would like to help, uh, make this show happen and be a part of our, uh, our ever
53:47growing team of patrons, uh, we would love for you to do so. You can go to patreon.com/dataoverdogma
53:56to do that. You just sign up there. Uh, if you choose to, you can, you know, at certain level,
54:01you can receive an early and ad-free version of every episode. Uh, you can, you can get the after
54:07party where we have, uh, extra bonus content, uh, every week. We answer questions, patrons,
54:13questions, and we talk about our lives and, uh, just, it's, it's a good time, little free form,
54:19little, little hippie-dippy. You got to love it. Uh, next stuff. Yeah. Yeah, man. We're, we're
54:25getting all kinds of crazy up in there. All right. So if you'd like to reach out to us,
54:30it's contact@dataoverdogmapod.com and we'll talk to you again next week. Bye everybody.
54:42Data Overdogma is a member of the Airwave Media Network. It is a production of Data Overdogma Media
54:47LLC. Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.