Ep 78: The Biblical View of Immigrants

← All episodes
Sep 29, 2024 1h 01m 44s

Description

This week Craig Mousin and Cecil Cicirello of the Lawful Assembly podcast join us to talk about one of the major hot-button issues in current world politics: immigration. Craig is not only a lawyer who specializes in immigration law, he's also an ordained minister, so we asked him on to bring his unique perspective to bear on the issue. We discuss the current state of things in the U.S., and ask what a Biblical approach might be.

You can find Lawful Assembly wherever you get your podcasts, or at https://www.lawfulpod.com/. Go give them a listen!

 

Follow us on the various social media places:

https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod

https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma

Transcript

00:00What about us sending weapons and arms and training people in other countries to terrorize

00:06their own citizens and then they flee those places and come here?

00:11We create a lot of problems in the world and then we close our doors when we don't want

00:15to see the problems that we created.

00:17I love that we're proposing a you broke it, you bought it, you have a lot of immigration.

00:22Yeah, that's a great way to put it.

00:24I want to quote you on that.

00:30Hey everybody, I'm Dan McClellan and I'm Dan Beecher and you are listening to the

00:35Data Over Dogma podcast where we increase public access to the academic study of the

00:40Bible and religion and combat the spread of misinformation about the same.

00:44How are things, Dan?

00:46Things are good, man.

00:47We've got some cool guests on the show today and I am eager to ask some questions.

00:54So I'm just going to dive in and introduce who we got here.

00:57All right, let's do it.

00:58These are the two gentlemen that make up the lawful assembly podcast.

01:03This is Cecil Cisarello and Craig Musin.

01:08That's Reverend Craig Musin JD if you want to get all kinds of crazy about it.

01:13These two guys are Cecil is like me, a ding dong with a bunch of other podcasts out here,

01:25an atheist, a secular humanist.

01:28And Craig, you are a professor at the Grace School of Applied Diplomacy at DePaul University,

01:37your assistant minister for immigrant justice and at the Wellington United Church of Christ.

01:44You got, how many more Appalachians and affiliations do you need before you're done?

01:50That's what I want to know.

01:53And hold on now, before Craig goes, you went to all the trouble to ask him,

01:58when you, here's what I want you to say, it's spelled P-O-D-C-A-S-T-R.

02:04That's what I do.

02:05You are a podcaster.

02:06That's right.

02:07It's pretty much the only thing I do.

02:10What I did was I found really smart people to talk to and that's what I got in Craig.

02:14And you're actually a wonderful podcaster.

02:16People should check out cognitive dissonance, which is an amazing show.

02:20And you're also on Citation Needed, which is a great show.

02:23Some really good content out there.

02:26But today, we're going to be diving into this show, which is the lawful assembly,

02:31and sort of talking about one point of crossover that your show and our show kind of have.

02:37Regardless of the atheist and the believer dynamic,

02:43which I don't know how you guys think that's going to work.

02:45Because honestly, what do you guys just yell at each other every episode? Is that all you do?

02:51I think our list says to want more of that, actually.

02:53Our listeners want more of that, to be honest.

02:55They want more yelling.

02:56Yeah, everybody that I tell about our show, they think,

03:00"Oh, it's going to be a debate show."

03:02And it's like, "No, I just defer to Dan on it."

03:04That's what I do, too.

03:06So, no, God, wait a second there.

03:10So, the reason that we wanted to have you guys on is because

03:15Craig, you have made a particular study of immigration, especially here in the United States.

03:21You are a lawyer. You are also a minister who specializes and focuses on issues of immigration.

03:29It seems to be a kind of a big deal these days.

03:32As we record this, we just had a couple of days ago the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald

03:41Trump, and this immigration was a really huge issue in that debate and continues to be politically,

03:49and I feel like, and I want to hear what your take on this with apologies to Cecil.

03:58I feel like there's a cognitive dissonance happening between the people on the far right

04:04who are largely composed of very, very devout Christians, and it feels to me like their take on

04:15immigration is at odds with what I have read Jesus said about immigration.

04:24So, I want Dan, I want Craig, I want you two to help us understand, first of all,

04:28what is the biblical take on the immigrant? I know that there are probably multiple takes,

04:35and they're probably conflicting because that's the Bible for you.

04:38But also, how do you guys think a Christian in the United States of America should apply those

04:50lessons to our current legal system slash how we deal with the immigration issue?

04:58I'd start with a good Samaritan story right from the beginning, and if your word is Jesus

05:06and responding to him, the lawyer said, "Who is my neighbor?"

05:12And Jesus pops up with this story about three people walking on a road from Jerusalem to Jericho,

05:19and the priest and the rabbi walk by, and the good Samaritan stops and helps heal.

05:26And we learned that the Samaritan was probably what some folks today, I hate the word, but might

05:33call an illegal alien in those places, didn't belong, and put himself at risk to even offer aid

05:40and comfort because the authorities might have thought that the Samaritan was the one that caused

05:46the crime, and he was trying to get out of it. That question, "Who is my neighbor?" That's

05:51the starting point, and the more you look at that story and study it, that you understand that we're

06:01all walking on that road, and we may be accosted, and who's going to be there for us? And if we

06:09start making rules about who takes care of whom, we get in trouble, and we've learned in a nation

06:16state scenario that we need certain rules to talk about borders, but we also then realize

06:23we learned in World War II and the Holocaust that if the rules are too strict, we turn ships like

06:28the St. Louis away and send 700 European Jews back to Europe to face the Holocaust, and therefore

06:35we need rules for refugees and asylum seekers, and we need to figure out how those all adjust.

06:41So that's a starting point. If that helps, it might help more if you need more out of that,

06:47but that's my starting point. But I'd also point out that I believe very strongly

06:51as a Christian that the sacred story contained both in the Hebrew scriptures and the Christian

06:57scriptures. Walter Bruggeman says that, "At the core of faith for Christians and Jews is the

07:07matrix of exile, that we have a story of we are forced into exile over generations. And therefore,

07:15thinking of that, if we are an exile people, we are people both a welcoming people, but also

07:21people in exile. And therefore, that should be the basis, the matrix of how we think about how to

07:27respond to immigrants in our midst." The exile thing's a very interesting thing because we don't

07:34think of European Americans as exiles, but part of the mythos of Europeans in America

07:43is that of the "pilgrims" coming and at least the story that I was told when I was a kid was,

07:53these were people seeking freedom, religious, a place to practice their religion freely,

08:03and they were exiled. That was their stories, that they were exiles fleeing to this land.

08:12Yeah, I always thought the same thing that they had to come here so they could draw their hand

08:16turkeys. Yes, absolutely. On a piece of paper, a little turkey with the five fingers. I think

08:22that that's what, no? Their outfits were looked much better than ours. They were pretty dope,

08:28to be honest. They were really good. I don't know if any of you have been to Plymouth,

08:32or Plymouth Plantation. I was there a few summers ago. It's just south of the town of Plymouth.

08:38There is a Plymouth Plantate. You can go there as a tourist and sit down at a table with those

08:43folks and grab a drumstick and have some... Oh kidding. I'm not sure you can eat it,

08:48but they're sitting there putting the food out and you're watching them pull it out.

08:54Oh, okay. You get to watch them eat. It's a lot of fun.

08:59It's not just Plymouth, right? Catholics came to Maryland seeking religious freedom and

09:06we found others going to Georgia and who became the Methodist in many ways, but it's a greater

09:14issue of... a general issue of freedom. We have to forget or we can't forget that

09:20at that time there were religious wars racking Europe over all kinds of fights over things that

09:27today we look and say, "Really? You were fighting over that?" But people were dying.

09:31That was the cauldron where people started thinking about those very same Puritans that

09:40came to Massachusetts forced Roger Williams to flee because his brand of Puritanism was different

09:47than theirs. Roger Williams became one of the founding theoreticians of the Baptist religion

09:55and his understandings of religious freedom are totally different than others.

10:00So I don't like the pain. I don't like the harm, but out of that people start realizing,

10:09"Well, if I'm being persecuted because I have a certain understanding of the Puritan religion,

10:15I'm being forced to go to Rhode Island, maybe my theory should be a little more open and not

10:20to hurt others." I hope some of us learn from that. Well, you mentioned the Jewish tradition and

10:26something that they have in the Jewish tradition. There are a variety of ways in which Jewish folks

10:32are to remind themselves of that background. For remember, you were a girl, you were an immigrant,

10:40you were a migrant, you were an exile, you were a slave. That's a part of their tradition to

10:45constantly remind yourself of that background, which is something that a lot of Christians I think

10:50don't do. We don't have a lot of folks who know, "Well, this is the origin of this particular

10:56denomination split off because we were trying to escape from persecution from another denomination

11:03that itself was trying to escape from persecution from another denomination." That kind of history

11:08is kind of left in the dustbin for a lot of Christians. I don't think that is the kind

11:13of identity marker and a lot of Christian identities that it is within the Jewish identity.

11:20You've done a lot of work on precisely that kind of understanding of one's sacred past.

11:28Do you have any thoughts on why Christianity might be an awful lot of Christians anyway,

11:34might be a little loath to treat that as central to their identity, whereas within Judaism it is

11:40foundational? If I knew that answer, I'd really be successful in figuring out how to resolve it,

11:45but I do struggle with that because one of the articles I wrote I contrast. A student of mine had

11:53given me a photo of some graffiti she saw in Florence, Italy, and it showed Jesus Christ with

12:00a crown of thorns, and he had a little placard on his front and said, "Migrant for life,"

12:07and there that points out a Christian version of that is the central part of Christianity that

12:13Jesus was a migrant for life. A few weeks later as I was working on this story I saw a photo from

12:19January 6th, and there's this very traditional photo that's in probably every process in Sunday

12:25school of Jesus looking up and this relatively white Jesus looking up. But in the photo from

12:33January 6th he had a MAGA hat on, and the Smithsonian's actually called that MAGA Jesus,

12:39and that's the group that you're suggesting is not thinking of the founding principles of

12:44Christianity being in exile. Forgetting that Jesus was an illegal immigrant coming back

12:51after his parents took him to Egypt. Can you imagine Joseph trying to prove he was the biological

12:57father of this young baby when they're coming back from Egypt into Israel? I did another paper

13:03much earlier on every major protagonist in the Bible. If you used the current prism of American

13:11immigration law, every major figure from Adam and Eve to St. Paul would have violated US immigration

13:20law, every war woman deported, excluded, everyone. Noah, you know how Noah broke immigration law? One,

13:28he went to another land without a visa, right? So he ends up in Turkey. But the more important one,

13:33we have anti-smuggling laws, and the smuggling laws say you bring someone across the border,

13:38you're guilty of immigration violation, but we'll exempt your family. Oh, wait, wait, we'll only

13:44accept the children. The daughters-in-law made Noah's smuggler, which would have made him

13:51deportable, right? Wow. He didn't fill out the little strip of paper that they hand you when you're

13:56coming in. I don't know how to fill that out. To me, that whole history there is that foundational,

14:06but we forget it. We get caught up into that the other side of Christianity that we've been

14:14chosen by God as an exceptional people to be in this land and to hold onto this land as ours.

14:21And that was a debate in the Jewish and Christian Bible of what part whose

14:26King David was certainly monarchical. And then in one of the big debates I have with former

14:31attorney general sessions, he really liked Nehemiah. Why do you like Nehemiah? Because Nehemiah built

14:36a wall. Yeah. And as he was quoted saying, that wall wasn't to keep people in. It was to keep people.

14:42Well, I've done some research that Nehemiah had one version, but there were a lot of

14:47folks in Israel at that time that had a different version. And there's tension. So

14:52what happens is we start grabbing different parts of the Bible that we seem to like

14:58our part of, let's build that wall and wall ourselves in. Yeah, that's- We've never encountered

15:04people grabbing the same part of the Bible, but deploying it differently for their own.

15:08Yeah, I've never, we've never seen that on our show. This is news to me.

15:13And I point out just to- Okay, Dan.

15:16I was just going to say one of the things that I think this reminder that you were this way,

15:22this is about restricting the use of power. It's about suggesting that you need to keep that in mind

15:30in order to appropriately treat people who are marginalized, marginalized, oppressed. And we have

15:39that reminder throughout, particularly within the prophetic critique that we find in the prophetic

15:43literature, the orphan, the widow, and the immigrants. And these are intended to function as kind of

15:51caps on the abuse of power. Whereas when it comes to a lot of Christianity today that wants to focus

15:57on how we can maximize our power. And it always seems to reduce to structuring power and values

16:07and boundaries to serve our interests. I don't think an awful lot of Christians are interested

16:12in putting a governor on that power. Their primary goal seems to be to find ways to maximize it.

16:19And that's troubling for me. Folks who try to leverage Christianity, try to maximize their power,

16:26have lost the plot. And I think that's something you talk about in some of the papers that you've

16:33published that this the central gospel message, even when we go back into the Hebrew Bible and

16:39those figures who are unrelated to the Christian message, it's about the fact that we're in a land

16:45that is not our own, even within the Christian gospel, you know, we're here on earth, which is

16:51not our home, we're supposed to be elsewhere. And to to kind of sideline the concern for the

16:59other for the neighbor doing exactly what the lawyer in Luke 10 is doing. Why did he ask who's

17:05my neighbor? Because he wanted to justify himself. He wanted to rationalize his reduction of that

17:13population of people who might be his neighbor. Whereas Jesus is one identifies it as kind of a

17:19behavioral vector rather than anything else. But but two is is trying to expand the boundaries of

17:28that population. But I'm sorry, I interrupted you. What where were you headed? Well, I was going to

17:34get back to your earlier point about forgetting about being an exile. But I was going to cite

17:39perhaps a very particular American story about a man named Joseph Smith, who finds some documents

17:45and material in upstate New York and then decides that he's not welcome in that community and starts

17:51to head west and gets to Navu Illinois and all of a sudden gets a little persecuted there because

17:55he's not really welcome and then gets the Missouri and loses more people and eventually finds a home

18:00in in Salt Lake City, Utah. And I've been to Salt Lake. I've been to the temple and I've watched this

18:07wonderful film about that trip. And if I urge people just it's worth watching this beautiful

18:14presentation. And I sit there as a asylum lawyer a refugee lawyer watching a people being persecuted

18:21as they pursue their ways across this country and totally the American experience right at the time

18:27of the States. And very important to that faith tradition and very important to where they are. But

18:34I sit there and think have have how do they reconcile that with the current folks who are

18:42being persecuted coming to our border that they had that tradition and they fortunately made it

18:47to a place. It's especially poignant that the Mormons when they made their way here to Salt Lake City,

18:55which is where Dan and I are based, they were fleeing the country. They were coming to Mexico.

19:01This was all part of Mexico at that time. And you know, one year later, it was suddenly not

19:06Mexico anymore. But like to me, that reversal where you can you can know that part of your history,

19:13part of your lore is fleeing one country to go and seek refuge in another country. And then

19:21as you know, as you point out, so many current Mormons want are build the wall,

19:29mega, you know, people. And it's, you know, that was, that was 150 years ago. That wasn't that long

19:37ago. When I was watching the, when on January 6, I was watching footage live. And I spotted

19:49what seemed to me to be Captain Moroni with his title of Liberty in the crowd. And I was like,

19:57that's a damn, Mormon cut right there. So I had, I was like, I was watching this on my computer,

20:03I CNN or something. And I went back and I got a screenshot and I was like, holy crap. And this

20:10is, this is a hero from the book of Mormon who tears down some fabric and writes on it. And for

20:16basically this, um, Patriot kind of quote, and, and waves this flag around called the title of Liberty.

20:25And this person was dressed more like a Roman centurion, but caring. It wasn't good cosplay,

20:31but it was cosplay. But this was, and there are an awful lot of Latter-day Saints who, as Dan said,

20:37are, are all in on the MAGA worldview, which just is, is all kinds of depressing. But

20:47that's another, that's another part of our own history, which is not very old, that we also

20:53tend to overlook because, uh, and this is something I am wont to say frequently. Everyone's negotiating

20:59with the Bible, with their history, with their identities, with their, uh, their

21:06exigencies and their goals for the future. Everybody's negotiating. So it's not a question of whether or not

21:10any of these things can find representation in the text. You can find all of that in the text.

21:16You can find, uh, rationalization for, uh, kicking the Mormons out in the history. I mean,

21:22there were some, some odd things going on, uh, within Mormonism as well. So for me, the interesting

21:28question is why are people prioritizing the parts of their history that they're prioritizing?

21:35Why are they centering in giving priority to certain things and then marginalizing or reinterpreting

21:40away other things? And, and I think the, the reminder is, uh, like I said, about limiting power. And for

21:49a lot of people, that's a non-starter. We're not here to, uh, to try to, uh, to limit power. And even

21:55Latter-day Saints, I think have been, I think we hitched our wagon in a lot of ways to an evangelical,

22:01um, American worldview in an effort to try to access the power and the resources that are

22:08available through evangelicalism. Uh, and then a lot of ways have, have adopted a worldview that

22:15is more concerned with power than it is for, uh, what most Latter-day Saints every, every

22:20Sunday and church are hearing is our duty, uh, as a follower of Jesus. And I, I, I, I have worked

22:26with a number of Latter-day Saints who I have, I am very proud to call my friends. And I know

22:31there's generosity and kindness and outreach as well. And I've had this debate with them as well,

22:38and, and been invited even to Provo to put forth some of my immigration views and been very kindly

22:43welcomed there. And I'm very grateful for that. But I make you right. Let me add another element

22:47to the power because I've really struggled as you have with trying to, uh, talk to family members or

22:53neighbors who disagree with me. And, uh, obviously one of the things that Cecil and I, one of the

22:59arguments we've had debates, debates we've had, the 10 commandments, right? What's the place of

23:06the 10 commandments and, and one, and one of the issues of religion is to help give us some order

23:13out of chaos. And we see that even in the creation story in Genesis and try to, and then people

23:20gather and, and in my tradition have a covenant with a God that says, if you live this way,

23:25there'll be more order. And that God says, Oh, by the way, part of that covenant is to be kind to

23:30the widow, the orphan, the stranger and to show justice and mercy. He should have wrote that down

23:35then instead of the time commandment. Well, let's go back to Genesis. Let's go back to Leviticus.

23:40I can point them out. If you want that lesson, see. Put that in style. It seems like a great idea

23:46to be honest. I would put that in stone. Danny, maybe you correct me, but I, I think, uh, Jim Wallace

23:51has counted what 62 times to welcome the stranger or the, the, it's, it is written in the language.

23:59We just tend to find tens a nice number to rally around. But I, but I want to be fair that, uh, I mean,

24:07I'm a parent and I live in a, I live in Chicago, which has a lot of wonderful, beautiful

24:12elements. And we have some violence. And so I have the worries that most parents have when my

24:17children go out on the street. Um, and so religion helps give me that order and helps give a sense.

24:23And so then I have some rules. And, and then how do you keep people following the rules unless

24:30there's an enforcement mechanism? And then, uh, I think Dan, you mentioned earlier that word stewardship,

24:35God gave us the earth to be stewards of. And sometimes we overdo the stewardship, right? Well,

24:42if I'm supposed to be a steward, I better keep out people who will take too much. Right. So I,

24:47I do think there is that tension that we all, um, I have people ask me, well, Craig, do you lock

24:54your doors at night? Right. So how is that different than locking our borders? And I think that's a

24:59good question. Let's talk about how vulnerable I want to be as an individual to welcome the other.

25:05But I, I do want to talk to folks who have that fear, right? And, and then

25:12that gets back to the education on our most of the people who are fleeing violence

25:17really coming to take from us. Are they just trying to escape the harm and that our ancestors

25:24had escaped also? Well, Craig, I'm going to guess that you have some numbers at your fingertip that

25:29could give a, that could shed some light on that question, the question of, because I think,

25:37you know, I've looked at figures of like criminality in the immigrant population versus criminality

25:44in the, uh, you know, the, the citizen population here in the US and, uh, it doesn't seem to shake out

25:52the way Trump would have us believe it shakes out. Not even close. Not even close. So talk to us a

25:59little bit about what your vision for, uh, for it. I mean, I, look, let's, let's not do a whole,

26:08you know, Craig Musin project 2025 here, but like, what, what, what does, what do you think a, a, a,

26:17an informed, you know, as someone who's legally informed and sort of informed by your religious,

26:24uh, uh, leanings, what, how, what would, what would a good, uh, policy look like for you?

26:30Well, let me, um, ask one quick question, little quiz here. I think Cecil may know the answer,

26:35because I probably asked him before, how many people lawfully immigrate to the United States

26:39every year? Do we ever hear that in the debate? Right. That's a great question. How many lawfully

26:43come in and enter our society? What do we have 300 million in the United States? Yeah.

26:48I have no idea. I don't want to put you on the spot. Well, that's, that's a fair answer. It's

26:53right. I often want to do public speaking. I do an auction. What do I hear there? I hear 10,000.

26:57I hear a hundred. Um, I mean, we hear, we hear numbers about him about, uh, unlawful immigration,

27:05and it's, and they're, you know, they're spouting numbers in the 20 million or whatever. And it's,

27:10which sounds absurd to me. And I, I don't think is correct, but so that's why I asked the question,

27:14because we, we forget that, uh, we immigrants have fueled this country from our very beginning

27:21days. Right. So up to recently almost a million people come in a year lawfully. Wow. About 600,000

27:28family oriented, about 125,000 through employment, another 100,000 or so refugees. And it all adds

27:36up in, in good years, 700,000 a million or something. But that's a big number that a lot of people don't

27:42know that we have had the capacity to accept and absorb and welcome and become fruitful members

27:52of our society. Yeah. I think that's even a low number of what we could do. Several years ago,

27:57I was working with refuge Syrian refugees in Jordan. And Jordan had over a million refugees in Jordan

28:04itself. Oh, wow. And someone commented to me, gosh, if America took per capita, the same number of

28:10refugees. Yeah. Because Jordan's a tiny, I mean, compared to us, that they're a very small country.

28:16And yeah, obviously many were living very poorly and camps and in overburden departments. But

28:24the fact that that country could even welcome and try to deal with the food and care of a million,

28:31we could do probably 50 or 60 million and not even feel the same pain was being felt in Jordan.

28:36So starting point for me is we have the capacity to be more generous. I'm also enough of a realist

28:44that we can't take in everyone. And part of what Cecil and I have been trying to do in our

28:50lawful assembly podcast is talk about kid, we, you're very questioned, work with the other nations of

28:56the world to say, how do we have a system that works for everybody? Part of that is helping folks

29:02in the where the climate change, you know, we put 90% of the 60% of the carbon that's causing climate

29:08change. And where's the impact being felt in a lot of the sending nations, Guatemalan farms

29:13that are getting drought or floods in other countries or rising sea levels in Bangladesh.

29:17We have some moral and just practical obligation to help those folks. So part of the immigration

29:24issues, can we help solve some of the problems that are sending? All right. What about us sending

29:29weapons and arms and training people in other countries to terrorize their own citizens? And

29:34then they they flee those places and come here. We create a lot of problems in the world. And then

29:39we close our doors when we don't want to see the problems that we created. I love that we're

29:44proposing a you broke it, you bought it. I like immigration. That's a great way to put it. I want

29:50to quote you on that. I love that. You know, when I was I'm kind of getting around here. So

29:57partly I use those numbers before we are fast approaching the problems of Italy and Japan that

30:04we don't have enough children being born in our nation to solve Social Security or even

30:11I'm a baby boomer and I'm part of that generation that's going to be expecting people to keep working

30:19to keep the retired folks working. We need more immigrants period, let alone refugees.

30:26Yes. So I think first we could up some of those numbers of family immigrants coming in.

30:32Think of all the new jobs that have been created by the inspiration of new ideas of both in the

30:42Silicon Valley but in the other areas that are trying to replicate the electronic knowledge and

30:49I bringing people in. So 125,000 when they try to fill that quota for employment visas in this

30:55country that gets filled almost immediately. There are people wanting to come. We're losing

31:00some of the best and brightest minds. We're going to Canada or going to New Zealand because they're

31:05more open. I want to sense we can up that. Now the big issue is the refugee issue. And depending

31:13what numbers you look at there can be close to 80 million to 100 million. Both displaced persons

31:20which in the legal definition is people who are still in their nation but they're not able to

31:24live in their home. They're in a camp at the other side of the country. And refugees who are

31:28technically people outside of their nation seeking a new safe place. But if you put them all together

31:33the UN and UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner of Refugees can get up to 100 million. It could be

31:4160 to 100 depending on the displaced persons. Does anyone in the world? Yes. So we're talking

31:47about people crossing the Mediterranean. We're talking about people crossing the South China Sea

31:54going over to Australia or New Zealand or finding places like that. And then people coming across to

32:00our land bridge with Mexico. And as you mentioned earlier, a lot of those folks are coming to what

32:06used to be Mexico. Right. Now we call it Arizona, Utah, New Mexico. We have this mentality of

32:17the only way to fix it is to build a bigger wall, to build more detention camps,

32:22and exclude and make barriers out of any kind of barrier, both a physical and a legal barrier.

32:30And Cecil and I have been discussing, instead of putting a lot of money, what's it, a million

32:38dollars a mile or a million dollars a foot to build the border wall and disrupt wilderness areas.

32:47We could do better processing with much more expeditious discernment if someone is of true

32:54refugee, if we had the right place to train lawyers to be available to help people explain

33:00why they're fleeing. Yeah, it does seem like the system is so wildly overburdened and wildly

33:09underfunded that it's designed. And I think this is true. I think we can say it is designed

33:15to be a disaster that then politicians can run on, look at the disaster there,

33:23not run on fixing it, like not proposing any way to actually fix it, just saying,

33:29look at how bad that is. All you have to do is just keep pulling away toothpicks until it falls

33:34down. Yeah. Yeah. And then pointed out how terrible it is. Yeah. Well, this is one of the

33:38decades back to our starting, my premise at least is my faith calls me to become an advocate for

33:45welcoming the stranger, as Dan had mentioned in the Levitical and other parts of the Hebrew

33:52scriptures and even the New Testament. But how do we do that in a way that doesn't put all this

33:59money to the, what are they calling the immigration industrial complex? Project 2025 wants to expand

34:06the detention facilities from 30,000 beds to over 100,000 beds. Yeah. All that money going into

34:12bidding facilities up with barbed wire and buildings and guards and 24 and locking human capital

34:19and buildings that they can't express their lives. And isn't it funny that if we didn't,

34:26if they didn't take that approach, like, you know, they consider, they love to tout that they're

34:31the, the side of fiscal responsibility. But if they just let these people in and let them work

34:37while they were waiting, they would be adding to our economy. They would be building our economy.

34:43We wouldn't be paying for their housing. We wouldn't be paying for their, for, you know,

34:47for their food and everything. We, it would literally be the opposite rather than a net

34:53suck on our economy. We would be building our economy while they're waiting to be processed,

34:58while they're waiting to be, to be dealt, you know, to whatever. And they want to work, like,

35:04almost everyone that comes through, they're ready to work. They want that to, you know,

35:10they want to be productive members of society. Well, one, one thing,

35:13a percent of our building trades or immigrants are undocumented. And we have a housing shortage.

35:18If they were working there, the other key you didn't mention is social security. They'd be

35:22putting money into social security for all those people in millennial generation worried that

35:26there won't be a social security system out there. We have some ways to fix it. And never

35:31having the opportunity to draw it out. That just goes in. That's, that's an input. That's free

35:36money for us. And they don't even get to keep any of it. Now that's, well, if we do have a

35:41lawful process that eventually they would, but that's still three or four decades down the road.

35:45Right. I think one thing that is, is being leveraged by the folks who want to continue to

35:52be able to wave undocumented immigrants as a, as a boogeyman in the face of other Americans,

36:02you, you mentioned earlier that we have birth rates are going down. And there's an awful lot of

36:09push on the part of Christian nationalists and particularly white nationalist leaning folks

36:16to get white families to have more kids because they would like that to be the means of overcoming

36:22this declining birth rate rather than bringing in non white citizens. I think there's an awful lot

36:28of white supremacy underlying a lot of the, the, the utility of this anti immigration rhetoric

36:35because a lot of the immigrants are coming from the global south. And the great replacement theory

36:41is very widely deployed by, by the folks who are fighting against immigration. In my previous

36:47employment, I was a scripture translation supervisor for the LDS church. I spent plenty of time

36:52working on language associated languages associated with refugee communities. I worked on a language

36:59called Karen, which is spoken by refugees from Myanmar. And I've spent time on the islands of

37:06Kiribas, which are some of the lowest line islands in the world, the places where the sea level

37:13changes has already entirely deleted some of the islands from that nation. And these are folks

37:21coming from the global south who are already taking up space in the US and people are not

37:27even aware that there are millions of, of immigrants from these places who are contributing members

37:33of society who are living among them. They, I don't think they pay attention and realize that

37:39they're there until they have someone come and, and lay concrete in their backyard or something.

37:44And they're like, I don't know that language is person speaking. And they're not, sometimes they

37:50are, they grow an appreciation for some of these folks who are coming here and have skills that

37:55they don't have. But one of the things that frustrates me, particularly from the point of view of,

38:00of Christianity is, is the fact that white supremacy and this fear of non white populations coming

38:08into the States is so popular, you know, particularly with, with Donald Trump and the rhetoric that

38:14he's used, what kind of immigrants are good immigrants versus what kind of immigrants are

38:18bad immigrants. There's, there's a very conspicuous color line that, that divides that for, for so

38:24many folks, which is, for me, one of the most aggravating parts of all of this.

38:31Absolutely. And Dan, I, my church, we had, we would call it the grace of God, but we had an old

38:39building in Chicago and a lot of deferred maintenance and the boiler was hardly working in the winter

38:45time. And we, by the grace of God, sold it in March of 2020. And we didn't have to take care of that

38:53after that. And we've sort of been a church in exile. So every six months, we've been renting a

38:58different space to try to figure out where we want to end up locating. But our current place on

39:03the north side of Chicago, we have a our worship space. There's a current congregation on the floor

39:11above us in the chapel above us. There is an Hispanic congregation that's worshiping in the

39:16fellowship hall. And there's the Baptist congregation worshiping in the main. And when I go in on a

39:21Sunday morning to help prepare for worship, it's glorious that there's different music, different

39:26sounds, different praise. And I just get so filled with different groups of folks being that same

39:33building, but making a joyful noise. And it just is like, this is what flourishing could be like

39:41when we allow that to happen. And just so the fact that you mentioned the current community that

39:45they're vibrant and participating in Chicago. And just wanted to share that because, and I also

39:54agree with you, the race line is just really the the mentioned the mentioned about the debate this

40:00week about the Haitians in our treatment of Haiti from the very not people don't realize that when

40:07the Haitian Revolution happened at the time of Thomas Jefferson president, the slave owners in

40:12Haiti fled to this country for safety and from the person that the perceived persecution that

40:18the slaves were going to have against them. And we welcome the slave owners into here to give

40:22protection. And then immediately set about to try to undermine the government of Haiti. And we forget

40:28that's again, we forget that that tradeoff that's happened in our history. And it's just

40:33tragicing on every decade against how this country has tried to make Haiti a weaker country. And now

40:39we say, why are you coming here? Yeah, interesting thing that we talked about on our show. Craig often

40:46will say that the people who are afraid are afraid that someone's going to take a piece of their

40:51pie, right? So there's a there's sort of a limited pie. And people who are afraid of immigrants are

40:58afraid, they're going to take their section, they're going to take my piece. And what we talk about

41:02on our show is not the great replacement theory, but the great inspiration theory, right? So we

41:07should be inspired by migrants, we should be inspired because they bring they bring innovation,

41:12they bring like Craig was saying, they bring energy, a different culture. And I told Craig once I said,

41:17you know, we shouldn't think of it like everybody trying to take a piece, one single piece of one

41:22pie. Instead, we should think of this more like a potluck. So everybody brings something to the

41:27table. And we all share in that new cultural experience, instead of all just saying, we just

41:32want to protect this one sliver of pie. And I got news for you, they have better pie.

41:38Dude, 100%. Our pie is not as good as their pot. We're not even close. Hey, my mother made a pretty

41:45mean apple pie with the mill away for some pretty solid.

41:50And that brings up the the issue of assimilation. A lot of folks are hammering the assimilation

42:01issue. It's like, I don't want to live in the kind of America that has no contributions from

42:06a lot of the cultures that have have come in to our our nation. And there's a I don't remember,

42:13I don't know if the studies have been done recently in the season. You may know better than I do,

42:18but from what I understand within three generations, from coming into a nation generally, the food,

42:26the clothing and the language, all tend to be lost. Three of the most central markers of ethnic

42:32identity tend to be lost within three generations of an immigrant coming into a country, just because

42:40that's what's required to survive, particularly in the US. And there are an awful lot of people

42:45who wish that were probably one generation or less these days, which which I don't think is,

42:52I don't think it's fair to people who are trying to look for a better life. I don't think that's

42:56the American dream, but I also think that that is a liability to us as well. I would love to see

43:04more I my experience as an American in this country has only been enriched by my encountering

43:11other cultures around me. And unfortunately, I think geographically, linguistically,

43:18in so many different ways, we're so isolated in the US, we tend to think that's the best way

43:23or the way it should be. And there's so much out there for folks to learn by coming into the

43:27green fight, both of you to come Chicago. My my wife teaches in a local elementary school and

43:32it's probably 40 different refugee groups that she has to teach. And she's a music teacher. She

43:37teaches anti global anti racism global curriculum through music and has written a couple songs that

43:43she has translated into like 30 different languages. So when someone comes in from Myanmar, she's able

43:48to welcome them with their song and their eyes get like this that the teachers singing a song and

43:53their language or the same song and Bosnia or whatever. But it's really and then she puts on a show at

43:58the end of the year where the kids get up and sing from their cultures. And so come on,

44:03come on out here next March and we'll invite you to go to that show because it really is

44:07inspiring and she comes home and night with story tears in her eyes with stories about

44:11what one little person was scared to death. And then the kids talk back in their language.

44:16Wow, I love that. I think I want to just just quickly, I want to invite you guys to also come

44:21to Salt Lake City sometime because I saw a black guy just the other day.

44:28We have diversity too. It hit with me, bro. It hit with me. I think of that in contrast,

44:34though, I was just going to mention, you know, you talk about their eyes opening up and how excited

44:38they are and how that that changes them. Think of that in contrast to the people who you see these

44:43videos of these people getting yelled at for speaking another language, right? You see these

44:48videos of someone being accosted because they're speaking a different language than someone else.

44:52And they're saying speak English while you're here, even though there, there's no actual national

44:57language in the United States. We don't, English is not our national language.

45:01Don't be giving them ideas. They tried. They're trying. I guess maybe we shouldn't mention it,

45:06death. That way we don't give them ideas. You're absolutely right. You're absolutely right. I won't

45:10do that again. Well, this is something that when I worked as a scripture translation supervisor,

45:13one of the things that that I tried to emphasize when it came to, well, one,

45:18for a bizarre reason, we sometimes found ourselves having to justify our existence

45:25because a lot of people thought everybody should be learning English. But a message that I found

45:30inspiring and very useful was that the entire, for returning to the concept of the scriptures and

45:39the Bible's message, the whole Christian gospel is a message of translation because the New Testament

45:48only originally existed in Greek. It is translated from, or at least the message as it originally

45:56circulated was being circulated in Aramaic had to be translated into Greek so that it could be

46:03proliferated more widely than the Aramaic speaking community. The message is about expanding the

46:09borders beyond linguistic boundaries and beyond national boundaries as well to every nation,

46:16kindred tongue and people as the great commission says. And so folks who want to try to

46:21reel all that back in and say, no, we all need to be isolated to our different ethnic groups,

46:29our different national groups, our different linguistic identities are counteracting the

46:35work that the wheel that has began in motion with the New Testament. So for folks who are committed

46:43to the Christian gospel, it just strikes me as just radically hypocritical to try to

46:52follow someone whose message was overcoming those boundaries by trying to tighten those boundaries

46:58down. I mean, I do think now you guys can correct me on this. I think that there was the moment on

47:04the Sermon on the Mount when he said, blessed are the guys who put down the razor wire.

47:10I'm not sure. It's something about that. Didn't he? Or am I wrong?

47:15My understanding is, well, and you're going to hear, I mean, somebody just, I think it was in

47:21response to the debate. I heard someone say that we love people by keeping them out or something

47:29like that. And that that's an expression of love to, you know, put buoys with razor wire wrapped

47:37around them in the river so that anyone who does try to cross will be made.

47:42I push back a little bit on this idea as an atheist for a second to the two religious guys.

47:47We're going to do shirts versus skins. You guys are sure you guys are skins. So the religious

47:52guys have to take the shirt off. But you know, it sounds like you and Craig are kind of doing a

47:58little logical fallacy here called no true Scotsman, right? You're saying that the people who don't

48:04really believe or really follow the Bible are getting it wrong. They're choosing to get it wrong.

48:10But they're following the same book you guys are. So what would you say to someone? I mean,

48:16would you say they're less? I don't think they're less of a Christian. I don't think Jeff Sessions

48:20is less of a Christian than other people are. But I think like, in some ways, by saying they're

48:26getting, I mean, they are factually getting it wrong, right? Because if you look at the traditions

48:30and the way in which it should be interpreted, they're factually getting it wrong. But they're

48:34interpretation of it is, I mean, isn't that just as valid as your guys's interpretation of it?

48:38Well, I think that's why I mentioned earlier, you can find all of this in the Bible and even

48:43in the New Testament, particularly in the book of Revelation and other places where there's an

48:48awful lot of us versus them rhetoric. But what I pointed out was what the question that interests

48:53me is why are certain features being centered and given priority and other features are being

48:59marginalized or reinterpreted away? Because everybody has no other choice but to negotiate with it.

49:05And so my concern is, what are the goals? What are the rhetorical goals of the particular

49:10negotiation that you're asserting? Is it to expand the Christian message gospel identity?

49:18Or is it to expand your power? I think when people are prioritizing power over people,

49:25yes, you can make the case that that is there in the Bible. And so it's not inaccurate. It's not

49:31wrong. It's a particular configuration, though, and it's a configuration that is aimed at for

49:38the purpose of increasing power. And so I would just say, well, you're using Christianity to

49:43structure power. I'm more, I think, a person who is using Christianity to expand their capacity for

49:51love and to help other people is it's a Christianity that I appreciate more.

49:57And so it's not a wrong Christianity from from an objective point of view, but it is certainly

50:02one that I think has a better case to make for continued existence.

50:08I have a little bit of different approach to the just simply the power issue. There's no doubt

50:14that's part of it. And I believe there are certain folks who certainly would ascribe to

50:18completely that, yes, that's the or at least admit themselves that that's what they're trying to do.

50:23I want to get back to what I said earlier about trying to raise a family in a community and having

50:29a set of guidelines and rules and trying to figure out how to do that. And there is a whole school

50:35of Christianity that takes the understanding that because we are not perfectible human beings

50:42that we are going to either sin or we are going through through weakness or fatigue or sickness.

50:48We can't perfectly be that perfect Christian. We are striving to get there. But in doing that,

50:55we also have to recognize that there are others who aren't striving. There are others who just

51:01don't want to be religious at all. And there are others who want only power powers or soul mechanism.

51:08And we need to be to be stewards of our family. We have to protect against them. So it's a whole

51:13school of religious thought that deals with my inability to be perfect. Therefore, I've got to

51:19live in the real world and be more pregnant. Leads claim more pregnant or realistic. Christian

51:24realism is what they would put that extra word on there. And I have friends and colleagues that

51:29believe strongly on that. And I believe they would claim the perfect Christian is a Christian

51:34realist. And Dan and Craig here are a little bit too much over on that utopian side of the religion

51:40and they're having that hope for people being better than they are. And they're willing to risk

51:45that. And they would even accuse me of, I let them do the dirty work like build the army and

51:50build the board of a troll and the police force. And they're the ones protecting society. And I'm

51:56over here able to spout my idealistic versions. And so we get in that debate whether they live

52:03in my world even. So part of that's power. Dan, I don't deny you're part of it. But I think that

52:09other side of once you start understanding what's your anthropology, what's your understanding of

52:16human nature, then you kind of read your scripture through that. I see it as I see those religious

52:22people as using the Bible to do something immoral. That's what I see it as. They're saying they're

52:26hiding behind those those scriptures in a way to say, well, I'm allowed to do certain things. And

52:33then I can point it to the Bible. And then I'm using that as a sort of a moral shorthand to say,

52:37I am still moral. I am following the Bible because I pick and choose those particular

52:42passages in which to enforce. We'll have to keep having that conversation, Craig. We're taking it

52:48off. Craig, one of the things that I wanted to just sort of along these lines, it just seems like,

52:53you know, when and I'm not as up on the numbers as you are certainly, but I, you know, every time I

53:00read, you know, I hear the, you know, these politicians spouting all of these numbers about, you know,

53:08or Trump talking about their, they're all criminals and they're all violent and, you know,

53:13Hannibal Lecter is coming across the border to get us. And, and I feel like most of their

53:22arguments are based on a falsified view of what's actually happening at our borders, like who these

53:30people actually are, how they're actually, what their impact on our society actually is.

53:36And it seems to me like one of the great tells as to who's being, because you're right, Cecil,

53:44there's like, there's absolutely a case to make that they're just being Christians,

53:51and it's just a different mode of Christianity. But it seems like a tell to me that they have to use

53:56lies to front, to forward their version of this when lying is, you know, one of your favorite,

54:04one of your top 10. That's, that's one of your nuts right in there. You're not supposed to do that.

54:08Is that, is that a fair assessment, Craig?

54:12I'm still struggling with who they are. Okay. I'm talking about, I'm talking about Trump.

54:18I'm talking about the far right cohort that are trying to talk about all of those. Yeah.

54:23Stephen Miller was just on TV the other day talking about how they're going,

54:28they're sending Venezuelan gangs to take over apartment buildings and which is, which is 100,

54:33like my family lives in Denver. That's not happening. Yeah. I know it's not, it's 100%

54:38a lie. But Stephen Miller is, I don't know if he's, he's an out Christian, but he definitely

54:44worked on Project 2025. So he's one of those people. I know he's had family in the Holocaust,

54:49uncles, or previous generation. And that's why I'm not sure of his,

54:54but certainly his view. So that's the one that's being imported to Trump.

54:58I mean, even just the whole insane they're eating our cats and dogs thing is like,

55:04this is, they're trying to paint a false picture of who the immigrant population is.

55:11And then I think one of the things that that's so telling to me,

55:15I think one of the things that Craig is trying to get across is also that it's not a binary.

55:21And I think when we, when we use the most conspicuous representatives of a given worldview

55:28to kind of delineate what we think that worldview encapsulates, I think that sometimes distorts

55:34as well. It is a spectrum. And, and while I'm trying to, my cognitive science of religion

55:40approach to this is, is usually focused on what kind of power asymmetries are going on,

55:47who's interested in structuring power. I think that is accounting for things that are closer to

55:51the ends of the spectrum. But certainly there are, there are folks who are engaging this in a more

55:57thoughtful way, maybe not in a way that is as thoughtful as, as Craig and I would like,

56:01but certainly in a more thoughtful way. And so I think, you know, nobody's immune from reducing

56:08the other to their worst representatives. And I, I think sometimes when we frame it that way,

56:13we're just as guilty of, of trying to, um, trying to see a binary where, where there's more of a

56:20spectrum. And that's why I ask those families, I mean, I've had some very, very powerful conversations

56:26with, uh, school teachers who feel burdened that there are too many immigrants coming to their

56:33classroom and they have limited resources already. And it's a very practical problem of,

56:37I'm asked to teach a class of 25. Oh, no, it's 35 and the same resources. And where's the problem?

56:43The problem must be, oh, I hear that politician saying the border is out of control. And that

56:50makes it easy for me to think, well, one, there are a number of Christian arguments, right? That

56:57theoretically, someone coming across without papers is taking a resource that they don't own.

57:05They're stealing a resource there. Uh, and so people start getting then their head and they say,

57:11okay, that's wrong. Therefore, I want to go back to that 25 classroom and the resources that this

57:18town is paying for. That makes it ripe for the politicians who use the rhetoric to make them

57:25think they're still being good Christians, but they just want to teach your class of 25 students.

57:31And we've got to do a better job of like we're trying to do to call them on those statistics in

57:37those facts. If we don't, I also asked people, if you come to Chicago and drive to Sabo Lakeshore

57:44Drive and the speed limits 40, and if you go less than 55, you're a safety hazard. It's just non-stop.

57:51Do we call those illegal drivers? How many times have people jaywalked? Do we call them

57:56illegal walkers? Or just illegals altogether? Yeah, right. Yeah, they're all, but they're all,

58:02we all adjudicate them being wrong before they've been to an immigration court and had an adjudication.

58:08I do asylum law. When I go into court and represent someone, the first thing I have to do is admit

58:13they broke the law that they came in and they're here without papers, but they're seeking the remedy,

58:19which Congress has given them if they prove it of getting asylum. The refugee convention,

58:24at its very inception said, because of what happened in World War II, and we saw Jews turned away at

58:31borders, sent back to Germany from Switzerland or the US sending this St. Louis back, people

58:37can't do the proper paperwork if they're being persecuted. But what does that mean? I have to

58:42admit in court, yes, I'm a native of ex-country. I came in this time. I don't have paperwork to be

58:49here, but your honor, I'm going to show you all these elements that I'm able for some,

58:55but the people get stopped in the first part. Oh, they admitted they're wrong, but that's how the

59:00system works. We have to do a better job of educating. And I really want to engage with other

59:06Christians to understand that why that rhetoric works when it shouldn't.

59:12This is such a fascinating conversation. We could probably go on for hours, but

59:18we won't. I do want to tantalize our listeners and let them know that Cecil and Craig will be

59:27joining us on our after party. If you are a patron of the show, you can hear more of this

59:33fascinating conversation. If you're not, we're going to call it. Thank you so much,

59:38Cecil and Craig for joining us on the show. Tell us about the lawful assembly podcast,

59:44where people can find it, all of that sort of fun stuff. Sure. You can go to lawfulpod.com,

59:49and you can find us. We have, we've been recording since the beginning of the year,

59:53so we have a nice backlog. We have tons of great episodes. A lot of times we're talking about

59:58law stuff, so it's, it's law things that are happening. The things that are happening in the

60:02Supreme Court immigrate whenever anything large happens with immigration, we almost always certainly

60:08talk about it. So there's lots of things that we, that we cover sort of a broad spectrum of topics

60:13that have to do with election interference trials all the way to immigration changes and, and the way

60:19in which say project 2025 is going to change has a face, has a way to change the face of immigration.

60:26So we cover all kinds of things like that, and you can find us at lawfulpod.com.

60:29That's awesome. And come to Chicago and enjoy some of our restaurants.

60:32Yeah. Oh, yeah. We're coming out. We're missing the son or the street fairs.

60:36We're going to stay in your place. I hope you're ready. All good.

60:39The door is open. Did you guys not consider Bob LaBlah's law pod? Is that, was that off the table

60:45when you got started? And then also I would say, you want to go toe to toe on bird law?

60:50Because that's, that's an even more inside joke. Never mind.

60:54Dan is a flowing font of, of cultural references. So please, please ignore me.

61:01Friends at home, if you would like to become a patron of the show and perhaps listen in on as,

61:08as we talk more with Cecil and Craig, you can go to patreon.com/dataoverdogma.

61:15If you want to reach out to us about anything that you've heard, you can write to us

61:19contact at dataoverdogmapod.com. And we will talk to you again next week.

61:25Bye everybody. Thank you for your hospitality. Thanks for having us, guys.

61:33Data Over Dogma is a member of the AirWave Media Podcast Network. It is a production of Data Over Dogma

61:39Media, LLC, copyright 2024, all rights reserved.