Ep 141: Did Jesus Fulfill Prophesy?

← All episodes
Dec 14, 2025 1h 08m 13s

Description

The birth of Jesus is obviously one of the most important Christian narratives. Or is it two of the most important Christian Narratives? Either way, one of the great apologetic claims about nativity is that it fulfilled over three hundred prophesies. This week, we're going to look at some of those prophesies, and see if those claims hold up.

Then it's roll-play time. Dan B will do his best to take the place of online apologists who challenge Dan M's claims. Will McClellan actually answer their complaints, or will this be an exercise in straw-manning their arguments? You be the judge!

----

For early access to an ad-free version of every episode of Data Over Dogma, exclusive content, and the opportunity to support our work, please consider becoming a monthly patron at:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/DataOverDogma⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   

Follow us on the various social media places:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Have you ordered Dan McClellan's New York Times bestselling book ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Bible Says So⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ yet???

Transcript

00:00>> You're saying they couldn't find the clite.

00:04I'm just going to say that's delightful.

00:09>> Look, they were hiding, they were up under a cleft.

00:14>> It's not always easy to find, it's not their fault.

00:18>> Oh, gosh, it's a good thing my wife doesn't listen to positive.

00:23>> Hey everybody, I'm Dan McClellan.

00:32>> And I'm Dan Beecher.

00:33>> And you're listening to the Data Over Dogma podcast, where we increase public access

00:37to the academic study of the Bible and religion, and we combat the spread of misinformation

00:42about the same.

00:43How are things today, Dan?

00:45>> Riding high, just having fun, getting out into the world.

00:51>> No, not right now, right now I'm sitting in a podcast studio, coming to you live from

01:01Data Over Dogma Studios here in even a lot.

01:04>> In lovely downtown Salt Lake City.

01:06>> Salt Lake City, Utah.

01:08>> All right.

01:09>> I'm fine, how are you, Dan?

01:11>> I'm doing all right, I'm getting over my post-SBL, what do they call them, con cruds.

01:20>> The con crud, yes.

01:22The convention sickness that I pick up, always managed to pick up, usually probably in an

01:28airport on the way home from- >> I think they call it conclave, is what

01:32they call it.

01:33>> They made a movie about that, didn't they?

01:36>> Yeah, yeah, yeah.

01:38But yeah, other than that, it's a lovely-ish, very cold day here, but the sun's out at

01:44least, I guess.

01:45>> Yeah, man.

01:46>> Yeah.

01:47>> And you know what I hear?

01:49>> I hear those sleigh bells jingling, ring ting tingling too.

01:53It is, for us now, in this part of the temporal plane, the holiday season, it is.

02:02Others may be listening, you listener at home may be catching this a different time

02:06of year, but for us right now, it is the holiday season.

02:10And so, as is our want, or want, if people want to get weird about it, we're going to

02:17talk about Jeebus and his birth.

02:20>> It's the time of year where we've got to confront some of that ever-present misinformation.

02:28And we've done this many times in the past talking about things like why December 25th

02:34talked about, we've talked about no room at the inn, we talked about stuff like that.

02:39>> Which turns out, there's not even an inn.

02:41>> There's no inn to speak of, yeah.

02:44>> Why would there be room there?

02:45It doesn't make any sense.

02:46And we may actually, in this episode, I will warn people, we may cover some ground, or touch

02:51on some ground that we have hit before, because it's one of those things where, I don't know,

03:01sometimes you got to hit some things that you already talked about.

03:04>> There are only so many passages in the Bible that discuss Jesus' birth.

03:08>> But I think we got some fun angles to talk about.

03:11>> Yes, we're going to take issue with, this is mostly just apologetics, we're going to

03:17take issue.

03:18>> Yeah, yeah.

03:19>> But right, like the whole show's going to be apologetics.

03:22But our first taking issue, we're going to get on to Ken Ham's website.

03:27>> Ken Ham.

03:28>> And we're going to go over to answers in Genesis, and we're going to see if the birth

03:32of Jesus actually fulfilled prophecies from the Hebrew Bible.

03:38>> And then in the second half of the show, and it will be an exact half, too.

03:45You watch.

03:46Numerically, work it out.

03:47I want you guys to make sure that you hold us to this.

03:50>> Okay.

03:51>> We're going to do sorry apologetics, or sorry apologetics, in which we will talk about

03:59some of the objections that people have raised, Dan, to your claims on the media of socials.

04:07>> Yes.

04:08>> Yes.

04:09>> So that'll be a lot of fun.

04:10>> So that'll be a lot of fun.

04:11>> I am out here to ruin Christmas for everybody, and so a lot of apologists have said, "No,

04:15here's the story, and we're going to talk about those claims."

04:20>> Yeah.

04:21Yeah.

04:22All right.

04:23Well, let's dive in with taking issue.

04:29And we're taking issue this week with, as we said, answers in Genesis.

04:34There's an article written by one, Dr. Tim Chaffee, and earlier, what you guys at home

04:40don't know, is that Dan immediately dove into, "Where's that doctor from?

04:47Do I need to call out now whether that doctor title is deserved or not?"

04:53Whenever people make a big deal of including doctor on their names as, in their credits

04:59for articles, and particularly blog posts and stuff like that, it always raises the red

05:06flag, because there are a lot of folks out there who insist on being called doctor, like

05:11Dr. James White, it's hilarious how much people insist on referring to him as Dr. James White,

05:20and he does not have a legitimate doctoral degree, so it's always just a red flag of

05:26mine.

05:27>> Sure.

05:28Well, it is a theological seminary that awarded this doctorate.

05:35It is, as far as I can tell, accredited.

05:37So I have nothing to say about the credentials of the good doctor, but we will have some things

05:46to say about whether or not the birth of Christ fulfilled a bunch of prophecies because that's

05:53something that related to a claim we hear all the time.

05:55Oh Jesus fulfilled 300 plus prophecies, and you know, the chances of that happening are

06:00buh.

06:01>> Or infinitesimal.

06:02Yeah.

06:03Well, they're significantly better if you craft the story so that he does fulfill this

06:08problem.

06:09>> And that's one of the things that you have to bring up every time people talk about that

06:14because the fulfillment is found in the same book as the prophecies.

06:20So it's like Harry Potter fulfilled a lot of prophecies as well.

06:25As long as you just keep the scope internal to Harry Potter.

06:29>> Right.

06:30>> And so--

06:31>> It's harder to make Harry Potter fulfill the prophecies of the Hebrew Bible, but I'm

06:34sure we could find a few.

06:36>> I'm sure we could find a couple, but yeah, what we're talking about is somebody writing

06:41about Jesus in a way that makes the story fulfill prophecy.

06:47And one of the reasons that this is the best interpretation of the data is precisely because

06:53there's another story about Jesus' birth from another text, and it's different in most

07:01of the places where at least the story in Matthew has Jesus fulfilling prophecy.

07:07And we'll talk about that.

07:09But to start--

07:11>> Yes.

07:12>> The probably the most famous prophecy of the whole Nativity comes from the book of

07:18Isaiah.

07:19>> Isaiah, yeah.

07:20We're doing Isaiah 714.

07:21Is that the one we're doing right now?

07:23>> Right.

07:24So this is coming from probably the second half of the eighth century BCE.

07:30And a lot of whether or not this seems like a prophecy is going to come down to how it's

07:35translated.

07:37And the way the good doctor, the translation that the good doctor has here is therefore

07:42the Lord himself will give you a sign, behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son and

07:51shall call his name Immanuel.

07:54>> Which, by the way, we've mentioned this before, but it really blows my mind how willing

08:03they are to throw this one out there, like right out the chute, right out the gate.

08:08And we know that his name was not called Immanuel.

08:13>> Yeah.

08:14>> Like, forget the virgin thing.

08:17We're going to get to the virgin thing.

08:18I get that.

08:19But like, what the heck is going on with the Immanuel part?

08:23>> Yeah, it's not like it was his middle name.

08:26It was nice.

08:27>> Jesus, Immanuel Christ.

08:28>> No.

08:29That's not where it was like, Jesus, Immanuel Christ, you get down here and claim to me.

08:34>> Your mom, okay.

08:35>> No, yeah, that's so weird to me that they trot that one out.

08:39But okay.

08:40>> Well, and there's a reason for that.

08:43If you look in, because it's quoted in Matthew 1, I think it's in the 20s somewhere.

08:50>> 123.

08:51>> 123, okay, Matthew 123.

08:54So I've got a few different translations in front of me.

08:58King James version says, and they shall call his name Immanuel.

09:03Now if you'll notice in the Isaiah 714, it doesn't repeat or it doesn't give us a subject

09:08because it's still being governed by the subject, the virgin.

09:12>> Right.

09:13>> Shall call his name.

09:14So the mom is going to name him Immanuel according to Isaiah 714.

09:18Once we get to Matthew, it's no longer the mom who's naming him.

09:21>> Right.

09:22>> What it says is they shall call his name Immanuel, which sounds like this unnamed they

09:30may not be the parents, it may be that the followers of Jesus will refer to him as if

09:40he were God among us.

09:43So it's kind of, the author is kind of massaging things a little bit.

09:50>> I get that point of order.

09:51>> And yet it says shall call his name, even in Matthew, his name Immanuel.

09:58It doesn't say shall call him the Immanuel, shall refer to him by title of Immanuel.

10:05And by the way, no one ever does, right?

10:09No one calls him Immanuel, not in the New Testament, but we don't need exactness here.

10:15And this is one of the things that that apologists will sometimes say, prophecies are vague.

10:21And that just makes him more true.

10:22That doesn't mean it's not like they're intentionally vague so that they can be shellacked over

10:27a variety of different contexts.

10:31So I think the way that you can get around people going, well, wait a minute, his name

10:36is not Immanuel.

10:37I mean, in the same chapter, you say his name's going to be Jesus.

10:44So yeah, this is one of the fudgy ways to get around the fact that this prophecy doesn't

10:51seem to be quite on target, but that's a change that is introduced in the way that Matthew

10:58quotes Isaiah 714.

11:01But Isaiah 714 is being mistranslated here as well because it does not say the virgin

11:07shall conceive.

11:09If you go look into the Jewish Publication Society Tanakh, you go look in the NRSVUE, you go look

11:17in a variety of different translations and it will use the words young woman because the

11:24Hebrew is alma, which means young woman of marriageable age, and it doesn't let you

11:33know whether or not it is in the future or in the past because it's using an adjective,

11:41which means pregnant, and so it's just saying, ha, alma, ha, ha, and then you have to provide

11:48the to be verb.

11:49And so you could technically say, well, I want it to be in the future.

11:54And that's what the Septuagint does in the Greek translation.

11:56Okay.

11:57But that adjective overwhelmingly is used to refer to either a current existing pregnancy

12:05or an imminent pregnancy.

12:08Okay.

12:09So it's usually is pregnant or is right about to be pregnant.

12:15Is it about to be pregnant?

12:16Yeah.

12:17And so is currently doing the dirty deed.

12:19Yeah.

12:20Like the pregnancy is in the post to be brief.

12:26And so yeah, what this almost certainly is referring to, the overwhelming majority of

12:31scholars will agree on this, is this is a reference to a woman who is pregnant in the

12:37time period when the author who probably is some historical dude named Isaiah from the

12:448th century BCE, knew about some woman who is pregnant and was like, look, that woman

12:51right there, she's pregnant.

12:53And then it goes on to say she will give birth to a son, which is not much of a prophecy

12:58because that frequently happens when you got a 50/50 shot on that one.

13:03Yeah.

13:04And they, and she will call his name Emmanuel.

13:08And so the, like the prophetic part really comes in the next verse where it says, uh, before

13:14he is, he shall eat curds and honey by the time he knows how to refuse the evil and choose

13:18the good for before the child knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land

13:23before whose two kings you are in dread will be deserted because the, the king is wringing

13:28his hands over the fact that there's this, this coalition that's forming up in the north

13:32and, and Isaiah's like, enhance your calm.

13:35Right.

13:36Because this, that, that lady's pregnant.

13:38She's going to have a son, Emmanuel.

13:41And you know, before his, uh, you know, whatever euphemism or whatever idiom you want to use

13:46today to mean before he, uh, you know, grows up, uh, those, those countries are not going

13:52to be countries anymore.

13:54So relax.

13:55Uh, and that's what the prophecy is doing in Isaiah seven, 14.

13:59Right.

14:00So Matthew is the, the author of the gospel of Matthew has wrenched this out of context.

14:07Now with the help of the Septuagint's translation, cause the Septuagint wants it to be relevant

14:14to its own time and, and place hundreds of years later.

14:18So, um, it's, it's already being brought a little closer.

14:22And so Matthew has just given it one additional step.

14:25And, uh, and it should be noted that this notion that there's a virgin birth is widely

14:30agreed to be a, a posthumous secondary accretion to the Jesus tradition where you're starting

14:38to get, uh, sensitivities to, to the origins of, of Jesus, like, uh, Paul and, and Mark

14:46say nothing about Jesus's origins, except that Paul says, you know, he was born of a

14:51woman.

14:52But great.

14:53And, um, happened to most of us really sets him apart there.

14:57Yeah.

14:58Uh, so there's nothing significant about his origins until we get to the later gospels

15:03where they begin to push the divinity of Jesus's origins further and further back in time.

15:09And so the virgin birth probably developed as sensitivities about the, you know, just

15:16the nature of, of sexual desire and sexual intercourse is, is leading people to, to want

15:22a distance, the divine messiah from, uh, from kind of a natural birth.

15:27And, and we talked about the, the immaculate conception, like that's just, that's just

15:32the further teasing out of, of those concerns.

15:36Yeah.

15:37And so part of me wondered if it was, if, if the virgin birth, because I get that there

15:43were all of these new sort of sexual mores and, and a little bit of, you know, conservative

15:49ideas of sexual, uh, impropriety creeping in or what, you know, in this moment in history,

15:57but also couldn't be that it was just who the author of Matthew was trying to square this

16:05idea of the, I think I remember you saying something about the Septuagint having, taking

16:13the, uh, the, the Hebrew of Isaiah and then making it the word virgin.

16:20Is that right?

16:21So could Matthew just be trying to square it with that prophecy as he's writing it?

16:28I don't think it is solely a result of the translation of Alma as, uh, Parthenos.

16:34I, I think, I think that contributes.

16:36I, I doubt that that is the sole reason.

16:38I doubt that the author was just like, look, it says part of the house.

16:41I gotta do something about it because, um, you know, it calls Dina Parthenos in the Septuagint

16:47after she has been violated.

16:50So like, uh, and I have a friend named, uh, Rodrigo Jesusa who, uh, wrote a wonderful

16:56paper published 15, 10, 15, no, 2008.

17:01So 17 years ago, uh, entitled, uh, is the choice of Parthenos theologically motivated

17:09in LXX, Isaiah 714 or something like that.

17:12And talks about the fact that that word had some semantic fuzziness to it even back then.

17:17And so it may, it may have just been kind of like, yeah, it works.

17:22And, uh, and so the author of Matthew, I think is probably, uh, it's probably a combination

17:28of factors.

17:29Uh, and then the, the author of the gospel of Luke, I think is probably just picking up

17:34that football and running with it, uh, writing as they are after.

17:38And, and the nativity account in Luke chapters one and two, I think is probably even later

17:43than the rest of Luke.

17:44I think it's a secondary addition to the gospel of Luke as well.

17:47So interesting.

17:48I'm just coming later.

17:53Uh, I know you want to move on with this, but I do want to check in with one thing.

17:58Yeah.

17:59I, I consulted another scholar about this.

18:03We talked about this, Dan.

18:04We don't consent.

18:05One, one doctor, chat GPT and, uh, and that's called, didn't even get his degree.

18:12Uh, he's no, but he did steal all of y'all's degree.

18:16He did.

18:17Yeah.

18:18That's, uh, that's fair.

18:19So he, what he, what chat GPT said was that somehow Matthew taking these older, these,

18:30uh, prophecies and, and squirreling around with them.

18:35It was part of a midrashic tradition, uh, and certain, yeah.

18:41And so I want to know more about that or, or if, or if that's just sort of not really

18:46a thing, but like, what is a midrash and, and, and how do you clear it up?

18:51Is it a cream?

18:52What do you, well, uh, midrash comes from Darash, uh, which, which means to, to seek, uh, and

19:00so it can, it's, it's, uh, it's an approach to scripture that, that tries to, uh, uncover

19:10significance and, and meaning that is really that is relevant to the reader and, and the

19:15person engaging the text.

19:18And so, um, I think there is a sense in which it is, um, it is certainly engaging in a very

19:25dynamic, uh, interpretive hermeneutic, uh, practice that is related to, to midrash.

19:32I would, I would hesitate to say that like the authors were like, I'm going to do midrash

19:38on this.

19:39And, uh, uh, and so I, I don't think that's illegitimate.

19:44Um, I, I don't know that if I were, uh, writing about this, that, that that I would choose

19:49to focus on that, but, but yeah, I think that's it.

19:53And you're in a fight with Dr. D. G. P. G. P. G. P. G. P. G. P. G. I get in fights

19:57with Dr. Chat G. P. G. P. G. All the time.

20:00Yeah.

20:01As well as you should.

20:02As well as you should.

20:03Don't trust chat G. P. G. K., uh, straight out the barrel.

20:06Get yourself a Dan and then, uh, and then I mean, I guess what, what Chat G. P. G.

20:11said was that the midrash, the reason it said that it was a midrash was that it would, it

20:18claimed that it was normal, uh, as a Jewish interpretive technique to, to sort of take

20:25older, older scripts and, and twist them and play with them and sort of expound on them

20:32and whatever.

20:33Yeah.

20:34And so, and so to take an old prophecy that doesn't actually apply to this and then just

20:39sort of apply it would have been understood at least at the time to have been a not, this

20:45is the absolute fulfillment of this prophecy, but like look at this echo to something in

20:51the past or something.

20:52Yeah.

20:53And, and I think there's truth to that.

20:54Obviously we, we've already talked about how the Septuagint is, is fiddling with the,

20:57with the rendering itself.

20:59Right.

21:00And so, so yeah, absolutely it is, it is following in the, the footsteps of, uh, other, uh, Greco

21:09Roman Jewish interpretive practices in that sense.

21:12It's not an outlier.

21:13Right.

21:14Well, to the degree, I would agree with the notion that like everybody knew, and it was

21:21transparently just, this is how we play with the text.

21:25We're not taking it seriously.

21:26Um, I don't know about that.

21:28I, I think that, and, and, um, I, there's a, there's an argument to be had there.

21:35Uh, no, it does, I mean, it does sound like to me, to my untrained ear, it sounds like

21:41Matthew was making hard claims.

21:43Yeah.

21:44And it doesn't sound like it's like, Hey, let's just play with this a little bit.

21:47Yeah.

21:48See what we think about it.

21:49Yeah.

21:50Have fun with it.

21:51Um, and, and I don't think Dr. Chaffee is suggesting this is just their creative exegetical,

21:56uh, practice.

21:57Right.

21:58I don't think that's the claim.

21:59I think the claim is this is absolutely historical.

22:04And this is what the prophets were talking about.

22:07And this is how Jesus, uh, fulfilled all these prophecies.

22:11And that's how you can know that Jesus actually resurrected, like I, I, that seems to be the

22:17argument coming from the folks who are appealing to these things today.

22:21Right.

22:22Now, now, whether or not the original audience of the gospel of Matthew would have been like,

22:26Oh, I didn't know that was what that was about.

22:29Uh, I think that depends on the audience you reconstruct and, and so, um, I think that's

22:35a little fuzzier and also not really the, the point of what we're doing here.

22:41Sorry.

22:42Not, not to say you're going off topic, but, um, but just to say, uh, yeah, I am, I am

22:47a little lost in the woods here.

22:48So let's, uh, let's, uh, should we get back into some more, uh, let's do a few more of

22:53these.

22:54Yeah.

22:55Um, I think the, the next one that's, uh, brought up is, Oh, you, and you, Oh, Bethlehem and

23:00the land of Judah are by no means least among the rulers of Judah.

23:05For from you shall come a ruler who will shepherd my people Israel.

23:08That's Matthew two six.

23:09And this is obviously riffing on Micah five two, which, uh, if I can just pull it up here

23:17real quick is a, uh, is a prophecy that says, um, well, it starts in five one, doesn't it?

23:24It depends on how you divide this up, but you, Oh, Bethlehem of Ephrata, who are one

23:31of the little clans of Judah from you shall come forth for me.

23:36One who is to rule in Israel, whose origin is from of old from ancient days.

23:41So that's the, that's the messianic prophecy as it was as it came to be understood by the

23:47time of the New Testament from Micah five.

23:51Now in the original context, this is, uh, probably pre-exilic and the expectation at

23:57the, is that there is a, there is an Israelite king, probably from the line of David, uh,

24:04who is going to arise and, uh, rule the people and lead the people.

24:10And, and there are a lot of details about what's going on in there that are still hotly

24:14debated by scholars, but nobody thinks this is actually about somebody who's going to

24:19be born 700 years later.

24:21This is about someone who is supposed to shepherd Israel, uh, prior to the exile and

24:27but this is, this is why what the reason we're bringing this up is that this is why the,

24:32uh, the, the Gospels have, has whirled this guy into Bethlehem somehow.

24:38Yes.

24:39Yes.

24:40And this is, and this is an interesting point to bring up again, Paul and, and the gospel

24:44of Mark say nothing about Bethlehem, in fact, there are only three places where the word

24:50Bethlehem ever occurs in all of the New Testament.

24:53One is in Matthew's nativity account.

24:55One is in Luke's nate, well, multiple, um, occurrences, but one places Matthew's nativity

25:01account, one places Luke's nate activity account.

25:03And then there's a single verse in the gospel of John, I think in chapter seven that references

25:09the Messiah being born in Bethlehem and the one of the reasons we think, hey, maybe this

25:16is just something that was, that was added later is because both Matthew and Luke have

25:21very different ways of getting Jesus to Bethlehem, right?

25:26Because Jesus is Jesus of Nazareth.

25:29And so both of them have to get Jesus back to Nazareth so he can be raised in Nazareth

25:35and be of Nazareth, middle name of, you know, Nazareth, Jesus of here.

25:44So they have very different ways of doing it.

25:46And if you just read Matthew, if you do not have the gospel of Luke, if you just read

25:50Matthew, Joseph and Mary are from Bethlehem and there, yeah, yeah, and they, then they

25:57take off a, Herod does his thing and they got a, they got to scramble into Egypt as refugees.

26:05And then they want to come back after Herod's dead, but Herod's son, Arcaleus is ruling

26:09in Judea.

26:10And so they've got a head north and it says they settle in Nazareth, which is not what

26:16you do when you're returning home is what you do when you're going to find a new place to

26:21live.

26:22Right.

26:23And so the gospel of Luke is entirely different.

26:25They live in Nazareth, they're just going down to Bethlehem because of this census thing

26:31that is going on that we're going to talk about later.

26:34Yeah.

26:35So the, so the why and the reason behind this is just that we have to, and for the fulfillment

26:41of prophecies sake, we have to get him to be both from Nazareth and from Bethlehem.

26:48Is that correct?

26:49Yes.

26:50He's Jesus of Nazareth, everybody knows where he came from, but we somehow got to have

26:56him born in Bethlehem.

26:58Okay.

26:59So, so we have two completely different stories about how Jesus of Nazareth was actually born

27:04in Bethlehem.

27:05Yeah.

27:06And, and that is, and, and scholars think this is probably because after Jesus's death

27:11when stories about, oh, this is a Messiah, he resurrected a game on, game on everybody.

27:17People were going, wait a minute, wait a minute, this is Jesus of Nazareth, but the Messiah

27:22is supposed to come from Bethlehem, at least last time I checked, Micah five, the Messiah

27:27was supposed to come from Bethlehem.

27:29And so the story develops, oh, yeah, nobody, nobody knows about it, but he actually was

27:34born in Bethlehem.

27:36So, so I think that's probably what's going on there.

27:39All right.

27:40Which brings up the next prophecy that, that he fulfilled, which is not actually a prophecy

27:47watch.

27:48How dare you?

27:49So, we, we go down to Matthew two, verse 18, and we have Herod, the slaughter of the

27:57innocents.

27:58Yes.

27:59Not a part of Luke, but, and that one feels like a pretty strong oversight.

28:04That one feels like, ooh, Luke, what are you doing?

28:09Yeah.

28:10And the reason all these prophecy fulfillment things are in Matthew is because Matthew was

28:14the one who was like, we got to have him fulfilling all these prophecies, more prophecies, more

28:19prophecies.

28:20And so, well, and he often is like overtly says, and this fulfilled the prophecy of X.

28:26Right.

28:27He was, he was being very overt about the whole thing.

28:29Yeah.

28:30One of the main rhetorical goals of the gospel of Matthew is to show how thoroughly and comprehensively

28:35Jesus fulfilled messianic prophecy from the Hebrew Bible, even if it's not an actual prophecy

28:40from the Hebrew Bible.

28:41Okay.

28:42So, Matthew two, 18, we get a quote, a voice was heard in Rama weeping and loud lamentation.

28:47Rachel weeping for her children.

28:49She refused to be comforted because they are no more.

28:52And this is from Jeremiah 31.

28:54And this is about the exile.

28:57It's just a lament.

28:58Right.

28:59And, and this is something that, that happens quite a bit in the gospels where they take

29:02something that is lamenting something that has already happened and they flip it and

29:08they say, oh, this is about the future.

29:10This is about this thing that just happened and, and this is, this is about Jesus.

29:16And so obviously this is about Herod killing all the innocent people in Bethlehem because

29:20Rama is not by Bethlehem.

29:25So like Bethlehem is like six miles south of Jerusalem.

29:29Rama is like six miles north of Jerusalem.

29:31So well, someone was that weeping and lamentation was loud.

29:36Yeah.

29:37So probably not that one's not as much of a bullseye as, as the others also weren't.

29:47So it's a slant prophecy.

29:53And then just a few verses before that we have, because of Herod's slaughtering of the innocent,

29:59we have Joseph and Mary grabbing Jesus and running off to Egypt.

30:05And then we have out of Egypt, I have called my son, which is another non prophecy that

30:11comes from the book of Hosea chapter 11 verse the first.

30:17And that is when Israel was a child, I loved him and out of Egypt, I called my son.

30:23The more I called them, the more they went from me, they kept sacrificing to the balls

30:28and offering incense to idols.

30:30So this is about Israel coming out of Egypt with the Exodus and just not being able to

30:37figure out, keep those dirty balls out of your mouth.

30:41Keep your balls to yourself, man.

30:43You don't know where they've been.

30:45So another, another thing that is not really a prophecy, but is something that the author

30:50of Matthew, and certainly this is something that you see in a lot of biblical hermeneutics

30:57and a lot of biblical exegesis is just see resonances.

31:01Oh, this is just like this thing that happened over there, boom, prophecy roasted.

31:07It gets to be a prophecy, even though it was never understood that way.

31:12Is your understanding of this one, because it is confusing why Matthew sent them to Egypt

31:19when nobody else talks about him going to Egypt or do other people talk about him going

31:23to Egypt?

31:24I don't know.

31:26So like, is it your understanding that Matthew took this Hosea and was just like, I'm going

31:32with that.

31:33I'm just going with it and just threw it into the story.

31:36It's so confusing to me because you're right out of Egypt.

31:41I called my son is very clearly a reference in Hosea to, you know, to the people of Israel.

31:51I don't, it's so weird to me, why, why, why put him in Egypt?

31:57I think it's part, it's a pretty complex constellation of events that Matthew has constructed here,

32:03but you need to get Jesus, Jesus to Nazareth.

32:07Luke has Jesus, or at least Jesus parents, starting in Nazareth, Matthew does not.

32:12So how do you get him to Nazareth?

32:14Well, if you have him leave, then you scare him out of Bethlehem.

32:19Yeah, you scare him out of Bethlehem.

32:21He comes back, but he can't resettle in Bethlehem.

32:25Right.

32:26You need him in Nazareth.

32:27Okay.

32:28Well, you have Arkelaus ruling in Judea, but guess what?

32:31Arkelaus was not ruling in Galilee.

32:32Okay, we can get Jesus to Galilee.

32:35That's how we get him to Nazareth.

32:36He's, he's got to leave, come back when Herod is dead, but then because somebody else took

32:43that part of Herod's kingdom, then Herod's direct line is no longer ruling over Galilee.

32:49We can have them settle in Nazareth.

32:51Okay.

32:52Where's he going?

32:53Why is he getting out of, of, uh, Bethlehem?

32:56Oh, let's get him to Egypt because we've got this passage that says I have called my son

33:01out of Egypt and let's get him to Egypt because of Herod slaughtering of the innocent.

33:07Like it's, it's a very complex, um, procession of events, but it all, it all fits together

33:14quite well.

33:15It is a, it's a dramatic story that has Jesus get from Bethlehem up to Nazareth and allows

33:23Matthew to say, Oh, prophecy, oh, prophecy, guess, guess what, prophecy, um, along the

33:30way.

33:31So, and I just had to look it up and remind myself, Nazareth is way up north.

33:36It's like, yes, 150 kilometers north of Jerusalem and Bethlehem is like right next to Jerusalem.

33:44Uh, it's like six kilometers or miles.

33:47I, I forget which one six is the number though, uh, south, south, southwest, just barely a

33:53little bit west of, uh, Jerusalem.

33:55Okay.

33:56Yeah.

33:57So, uh, like if you're standing on, uh, in a high point in Jerusalem, you can just make

34:03out one of the hilltops of, uh, of Bethlehem, if you're looking south, uh, and you know

34:09what to look for.

34:10Yeah.

34:11Um, and then we got an interesting one that, uh, God warned Joseph in a dream not to go

34:18back to Judea.

34:19So instead he took Mary and Jesus to Nazareth and Galilee that what was spoken by the prophets

34:23might be fulfilled that he would be called a Nazarene.

34:28And what I think is interesting here is, and this is another reason to think that Matthew

34:32does not have Joseph and Mary in Nazareth prior to Bethlehem is if this prophecy is that he

34:39would be called a Nazarene, why didn't Matthew say, so they went home or why did it like

34:45he has this decision to go to Nazareth.

34:49And that decision is what ultimately fulfills this prophecy, which it does not seem to be

34:55motivated by any kind of previous connections to this place at all.

35:00So, but the, the problem is there's no part of the Hebrew Bible that says he would be

35:05called a Nazarene.

35:10So that's a, that's a reference to a prophecy that we have no knowledge of.

35:14Well, and, and the there are two ways that this has traditionally been answered.

35:19And one is more common these days than the other, uh, one is that he would, uh, he would

35:25Nazarene is really supposed to be like Nazarite.

35:29Okay.

35:30And those two things, just to, those two things are not even related conceptually, is that

35:35right?

35:36They are not related conceptually.

35:37However, the way they are written in Greek transliteration is very close together.

35:42Right.

35:43So, um, but they, like there's nothing in the Hebrew Bible that says the Messiah would

35:50be a Nazarene either.

35:51Right.

35:52And the other thing is that it could be something from Isaiah 11 one, which talks about a, uh,

36:00a shoot shall come out from the stump of Jesse and a branch shall grow out of his roots.

36:05And Jesse is David's father, so it's Davidic.

36:10And it just so happens that, um, the word for, um, the branch shall grow out of his roots

36:19as netsair and so the, the claim is that Isaiah 11 one basically says the Messiah will

36:28be a netsair or a Nazarene if, uh, if you like.

36:35So it's still squinting at this pretty hard to try to make a connection there.

36:42But it, and it might be that Matthew was like, we got to have a prophecy here.

36:47Come on.

36:48Something.

36:49And they were like a netsair is like, I can work with that.

36:51I can work with that.

36:52Let's do Nazarene.

36:53That sounds like he's from Nazareth, uh, so possible that there were, you know, that

36:58there was just a Nazarene prophecy going around that just wasn't that we don't have or whatever.

37:04Yeah.

37:05It could have been something that they were like, this is the gratha, the unwritten prophecy,

37:09or it could be something that was in some texts that we just don't have anymore that,

37:14that at that time, the author of the gospel of Matthew was like, I can buy that being

37:18scripture.

37:19Um, so yeah.

37:21So what we have in Matthew is a series of things that really apart from just the identification

37:29of Nazareth and the identification of Bethlehem are not in Luke, um, where Matthew is, is

37:36telling the story in, in their own unique way to have Jesus fulfilling these prophecies.

37:44And the, and the data don't support the conclusion that, that Jesus actually fulfilled these prophecies.

37:50The data, I, I would argue, don't even indicate he was born in Bethlehem.

37:53I think most likely he was probably born in Nazareth and then at long after he died, people

37:58were like, who's going to stop us from saying he was born in Bethlehem.

38:02We could say what I want.

38:03The president, um, you know, they, they were just like, yeah, we can, we can have him born

38:08in Bethlehem.

38:09And, and these are ways to tell the stories and, and ways that make it seem like you're

38:12fulfilling prophecies, even when they're not even prophecies to begin with.

38:17Yeah.

38:18So make it throw a few in.

38:20Why not?

38:21Make it feel up.

38:22It's fine.

38:23Oh my God.

38:24And so I think, uh, I think if, if you want the fulfillment of prophecy to be evidence

38:30of something, you got to do an awful lot better than this, uh, because these that like, it's

38:36easy to fulfill prophecy when you're the one telling the story.

38:39Um, and, and if your whole goal is to show that Jesus fulfilled prophecy, you're a motivator.

38:45You're an, excuse me, you're a motivated crafter of a specific kind of story.

38:51Yeah.

38:52Um, yeah, I just, I just find that a stretch.

39:01Other, uh, prophecy fulfillment in this article from answers in Genesis, isn't he, doesn't

39:07even merit talking about?

39:09I mean, things like Nazareth was looked upon with scorn, uh, which, which meant that, uh,

39:16it fulfilled the idea that the Messiah would be despised and rejected of men.

39:21Yeah.

39:22Come on.

39:23Really?

39:24We're going to stretch to that hard.

39:26Yeah.

39:27Yeah.

39:28That's, that's quite a reach.

39:29But, but you know, these, these kinds of articles are not for critical thinkers.

39:33They're for people who really want to believe and just want to be made to feel like they

39:37have good reason to believe because even even some of the things in here are about, uh,

39:43like when, when we get to the, he would be called a Nazarene prophecy, like they introduced

39:48these options and it says, however, there are a few plausible solutions to this dilemma.

39:53So what is the argument?

39:55The argument is that it's plausible.

39:58Um, here are ways that we can, uh, argue that it's plausible.

40:02So it's, it's not about what's most likely.

40:04It's about, and, and I would say plausible is even a little bit of a stretch.

40:08It's, uh, it's that tiny little sliver of not impossible that apologetics is concerned

40:13to, to gin up.

40:14Well, if that's where we're going to go, if we're going to talk about that, let's do

40:18some sorry apologetics and move on to our next segment.

40:22All right, so sorry.

40:27It's apologetics.

40:28Uh, we're, we're going to get to this.

40:30Uh, you Dan sent me a document.

40:34Oh, let me pull it up.

40:35It's somewhere.

40:36Uh, here we go.

40:38Uh, and these are, give us the setup for what, for what, uh, what this is.

40:44Okay.

40:45So I, I've frequently pointed out that, uh, Luke chapter one and two, one, contradict

40:52the gospel of Matthew, but two contradict themselves, uh, and they, and they contradict

40:58the gospel of Matthew mainly in the fact that, uh, we, we've talked about some of it.

41:05Like Matthew has Joseph and Mary living in Bethlehem.

41:08They have nothing to do with Nazareth until they're coming back from, uh, from their

41:14refugee stint and are forced to go up to Galilee, uh, in fulfillment of some prophecy

41:22somewhere.

41:23Uh, so, so that's one example, uh, you know, Luke has, uh, Jesus is born in Bethlehem and

41:29they hang out.

41:30They're hanging out with family.

41:31They go to the temple.

41:32They fulfill what's required of them.

41:34And then they just mosey on back to Nazareth.

41:37Right.

41:38You do not, do not get the sense that the king is trying to murder the baby in the gospel

41:46of Luke, like this fleeing or whatever.

41:49Yes.

41:50Yes.

41:51And you know, and they're like, well, the author just didn't think it was important.

41:54It's like that is pretty profound, authorial neglect to be like, yeah, they, they went

42:01to the temple.

42:02This is really important that you know that they feel fluelled all this stuff.

42:05What about the fact that the king tried to murder him?

42:07And so they had to flee to another country, uh, no, not important.

42:11Um, so let, let's go through, uh, your, your arguments and objections.

42:16You, what you've done is you've separated this out into, uh, you've made some arguments.

42:20Yes.

42:21We're going to do some role playing here.

42:23And I'm going, I'm going to make the apologetic, uh, objection to your, to, to whatever your

42:29claims are.

42:30So, and feel free to editorialize to your heart's content.

42:32Oh, you know, I will, you know, I will.

42:36Glad to hear it.

42:38Okay.

42:39So, uh, we're going to start with the fact that the Bethlehem story is likely a secondary

42:43addition to the Jesus tradition.

42:45We've already talked about some of the reasons why, but one of them is the fact that it's

42:49never even mentioned in the letters are, uh, letters of Paul or in the gospel of Mark.

42:54And again, the word Bethlehem only ever occurs in Matthew's nativity account, Luke's nativity

43:00account and John's reference to the prophecy of the Messiah coming from Bethlehem.

43:07Uh huh.

43:08This my friend is the fallacy of the argument from silence.

43:13Yes.

43:14That is because they didn't mention it.

43:17Doesn't mean it didn't happen.

43:19Doesn't mean it didn't happen.

43:20They were not paying attention to important things.

43:25Yeah.

43:26And, and you know what?

43:27One of all the stuff we're going to go through this probably is like the least illegitimate,

43:33uh, because there is a degree to which it is an argument from silence.

43:37Yeah.

43:38Uh, now there, there is a point, uh, that a lot of people will make an argument from silence

43:42is not a fallacy.

43:43If we should have it, if we should expect to see it, if they should have mentioned it.

43:49And, and I think that that is not necessarily true, at least of the, uh, the writings of

43:56Paul, um, because Paul's not really about his temporal life.

44:01Uh, we have a passing reference to him being born of a woman, but that's serving a more,

44:06uh, a more, um, theological point.

44:08Well, I'm not even not claiming to have met Jesus.

44:13Right.

44:14Whereas, um, these, uh, gospel authors were at least the, if the authorship attribution

44:19were correct, we would be assuming that the authors had actually met and hung out with

44:24Jesus.

44:25Um, now, now the, like Mark is supposed to have just been the interpreter for Peter.

44:33So he, not necessarily, uh, new stuff, Luke is, you know, doing all this investigating.

44:39So, um, to, to a degree, yeah, we would expect them to have hung out with them.

44:44So it is true that that's a bit of an argument from silence.

44:48Mark, I think you would expect some kind of reference to this, but what's, what's interesting

44:53is even just outside of the Nativity accounts of both Matthew and Luke, they never refer

44:59to Jesus having come from Bethlehem.

45:01It's always Jesus of Nazareth.

45:03And scholars think that the Nativity account in Luke is a secondary edition.

45:08And there are even scholars who think the Nativity account in Matthew is a secondary

45:11edition.

45:12And the fact that they never, you never have a reference back to anything that happened

45:16before Jesus's baptism in any of the Gospels, apart from the Nativity accounts themselves

45:24is suggestive that the, his origins were not important to the stories that were in circulation

45:32about, uh, Jesus, it's once his ministry begins, that's when Jesus becomes relevance to everybody.

45:41And so you've got those Nativity accounts, but outside of that there, there just doesn't

45:45seem to be any relevance to Jesus's origins and certainly no indication about being born

45:51in Bethlehem.

45:53But we've talked about other reasons to think this is a secondary edition as well.

45:57So if we're just isolating that one point, I would say to some degree, Touche, um, and,

46:04and would say, but there are a lot of other things that contribute to that conclusion as

46:09well.

46:10And, and this is one of the conclusions I think is I would say is probable is most likely,

46:15but it's certainly not a slam dunk and I'm going to guess we're not going to get a lot

46:20of Touche's in this, uh, I was about to say that's the last you're going to hear that

46:24from me.

46:25So, so relish it.

46:27All right, next, uh, next Matthew and, and we talked about this in the previous segment

46:34seems to have Joseph and Mary living in Bethlehem and only later settling in Nazareth as a result

46:39of their desire, not to return to Bethlehem in light of Arkelaus's rule in Judea.

46:45Uh, but says, uh, Mr. Apologist coming in, uh, Matthew never says that Joseph and Mary

46:54were from Betla never says that they were from Bethlehem and not Nazareth.

46:59You never claims that he just, they just happen to be there then.

47:04Yeah.

47:05Yeah.

47:06And this is, this is a pretty common one and, and this is, uh, something you see in a lot

47:10of the arguments about contradictions where, you know, one resurrection story says there

47:15was an angel and then another resurrection story says there were two angels and it's

47:20like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.

47:22It said there was one.

47:23It didn't say there weren't two right to say there's an angel only means there's at least

47:29one.

47:30Yeah.

47:31If, if it says there's an angel, all that means is there was at least one angel.

47:34And if it says there were two angels, all that means is that there were at least two.

47:38Could have been billions of angels.

47:39Right.

47:40There could have been angels coming out of the cracks in the rocks and they only felt

47:44it was relevant to mention one or two, um, and, and, and this is a much weaker point

47:51because as, as we pointed out, the, the narrative States pretty clearly that they are coming

47:57back out of Egypt and they're like, Oh, we can't go back to Bethlehem.

48:00I guess we got to go to Galilee and the text says that they settle in Galilee in Nazareth,

48:07which is what you say when someone is moving somewhere new, not what you say when someone

48:12is returning home.

48:13Right.

48:14If this is where they were originally from, the narrative would be different.

48:19This is not the way you describe someone returning home.

48:23Well, and that, that hit home for me when I looked at that map just for just a few minutes

48:28ago.

48:29Just because like that is so much farther away and they're, you know, they're on donkey

48:34back.

48:35If there's even a donkey, there's not even a donkey, but like when you, yeah, when you're

48:40going that far out of your way, you're, uh, yeah, that's, you, you'd mention that that

48:47was home.

48:48It does feel like.

48:49Yeah.

48:50All right.

48:51Yeah.

48:52So I don't think that objection holds any water.

48:54I think that's a pretty weak one.

48:57Okay, next Matthew has Joseph and Mary and Bethlehem until they flee to Egypt to escape

49:04Herod's killing of the innocence and only returning to settle in Nazareth after Herod's

49:08death.

49:09Luke two 39 has them peacefully returning to Nazareth after they fulfill the legal requirements

49:15related to Jesus's birth.

49:17In other words, Luke does not seem to know that they were literally chased out of the

49:21country by the king, right, and then forced to, uh, to reside in another country before

49:28returning to Nazareth.

49:30Right.

49:31And here the objection, uh, is very similar.

49:34Yeah.

49:35Yeah.

49:36It's just, well, it doesn't say that, uh, it doesn't preclude the possibility that the

49:43slaughter of the innocence happened and they went into Egypt.

49:46It just, it just doesn't mention it.

49:49Yeah.

49:50And this is the, the same kind of thing as, as earlier where you take these incongruities

49:55and suggest that a, it's just, it's dealer's choice.

49:58The awkward could have said something, but just decided not to.

50:02But again, in, in this case, that is- Luke's body was running long.

50:05He was like, oh gosh, you know, I, I just started this story, but one needs to use the

50:11editorial mind, uh, when one, if you want to craft an interesting story.

50:16Yeah.

50:17And my argument would be that is pretty criminal neglect to leave out that detail.

50:24Yeah.

50:25It's a pretty, it's a, it's such a strong detail too.

50:30Yeah.

50:31Like that's, that's juicy.

50:32That's a juicy part of the story.

50:34Oh yeah.

50:35Big time.

50:36And just chronologically, it doesn't seem to work because in, uh, in Matthew, Herod

50:41says, uh, says, when did the star appear?

50:45And then goes and, uh, has everyone two years and under killed, which suggests that this

50:51is taking place two years after Jesus's birth.

50:55So Jesus is like maybe almost two years old, if not two years old, when this is happening

51:00and still in Bethlehem and, and still in Bethlehem.

51:04So, uh, another indication that they lived in Bethlehem right in Matthew, but in Luke,

51:12it says that they, uh, you know, they had to present them at the temple.

51:16And when all was fulfilled, they returned to their own city or their own town in Nazareth.

51:23And then it says they visited Jerusalem at the Passover every year.

51:31That does not allow for one them to, uh, flee to Egypt until Herod dies.

51:39It does not allow for them to be a persona, non grata in Jerusalem for however long.

51:47It does not allow them to still be around in two years when Herod is, is on the lookout.

51:53And it also suggests that they were free to come back once a year.

51:59And so it just, it just doesn't fit.

52:01Right.

52:02It doesn't fit.

52:03Speaking of them coming from Nazareth down to, uh, to Bethlehem, why did they do that?

52:12Well, we have the mechanism in Luke is this, this notion of a worldwide census, uh, Caesar,

52:18one of the world to be taxed.

52:20So, uh, he, he, uh, told everybody they had to go to their own city to be taxed.

52:27And, uh, the point to make here is that Rome would not have issued a census requiring everyone

52:32return to their ancestral hometown to register because that one wouldn't be possible for

52:38many people would nuke the economy for months, uh, and would give the Romans utterly useless

52:45information.

52:46Right.

52:47The whole point of the census is, uh, who's living and working where so we can tell the

52:52people who are governing that place, this is how much we want from you in taxes.

52:57So, uh, the notion that, uh, you would just go wherever you were from, uh, to register

53:04is just bafflingly, just asinine, just ahistorical that would not have happened.

53:12Uh, excuse me, Dr. McClellan, but I do believe that you are, that is your real name.

53:18If that, if that's from an accredited university, that doctor, but I do think that if you went

53:26to the British Museum and looked up, uh, P London 904, the papyrus 904, you would see

53:34very clearly that, uh, that there was a Roman edict that read Gaius Vibius Maximus prefect

53:42of Egypt says the enrollment by household being at hand.

53:47It is necessary to notify all who for any cause whatsoever are outside their gnomes or territories.

53:55To return to their domestic hearth or home that they may accomplish the customary dispensation

54:03of enrollment and continue steadfastly in the husbandry that belongs to them.

54:09Hmm.

54:10Yes.

54:11So they were, they were, wait a minute.

54:16I think I see the problem of my own argument.

54:19Uh, yes, and, and that would be that this says nothing about ancestral homestead or hometown.

54:26It says your, your hearth, um, and, and this is talking about returning home precisely because

54:32people traveled, people traveled for work, people traveled for pleasure.

54:36And if they're doing a census, they want to know where you live or where your, your job

54:41is.

54:42Yeah.

54:43Where's your hearth?

54:44Get to the hearth.

54:45Uh, Ali Ali oxen free.

54:47We need you, we need you back at your hearth and, and this is unrelated to the notion that

54:53this census would require Joseph to travel to Bethlehem and the, the text says that he

55:01went down to Bethlehem because he was of or descended from the house and the lineage

55:09of David.

55:11That's not saying that's where he lived, it's saying that's where he descended from

55:18ancestrally.

55:19He was of that ancestral hometown, uh, point of order, Luke two, three says that everyone

55:27went to his own city, which suggests hometown rather than ancestral hometown.

55:34Boom.

55:35You got schooled.

55:36Yes.

55:37It does say they all went to their own towns to be registered in verse three.

55:40And then it says Joseph also went from the town of Nazareth and Galilee to Judea to the

55:45city of David called Bethlehem because he was descended from the house and family of David.

55:49So here's the interesting thing though.

55:52When you go all the way down to where it says they went home, which is, uh, I think Luke

55:58two, is it 39?

56:01Yes.

56:02Uh, when they had finished everything required by the law of the Lord.

56:05So, so this is that, um, stuff in the temple with the baby Jesus and all that.

56:10And they've fulfilled everything that is required of them.

56:14They return to Galilee to their own town of Nazareth.

56:19And the Greek is identical to the Greek of Luke two, three.

56:23In other words, it says everybody in verse three went to their own town.

56:29According to Luke two 39, Joseph and Mary's own town, exact same Greek was Nazareth.

56:37Oh, so if you're saying that the census only required you to go to your own town, uh, then

56:46they left their own town.

56:48Right.

56:49And they, they messed up this census somehow.

56:51Yes.

56:52One way or another.

56:53They messed it up.

56:54Yeah.

56:55So he just misunderstood.

56:56Uh, it was pretty big mistake.

56:59He's like, ah, like I showed up at SBL a day early because I thought I, I, I am on a committee

57:06at SBL and I thought our committee meeting was on the Friday and SBL starts on Saturday.

57:11And no, it turns out that there are a lot of meetings that take place on Friday.

57:15But my particular meeting had actually been scheduled for Saturday.

57:18So I showed up a day early, uh, for, because I didn't understand.

57:23So, um, so yeah, that kind of thing happens, but, uh, it's a much bigger mistake for Joseph

57:29and Mary had to, had to travel that distance while she was pregnant.

57:32Yeah.

57:33Cause that's rough. She's like, why would we have to go to our ancestral home tent?

57:38I don't know.

57:39I don't know.

57:40I just, sweetie.

57:41I don't know.

57:42I just think that's what it means.

57:45Well, do they have those new electric donkeys?

57:51I see.

57:52I see an e-donkey.

57:53Uh, okay.

57:54So, uh, we have no record of an empire wide census, uh, from anywhere in ancient Rome

58:03and they would not have conducted a census themselves within Herod's own client kingdom.

58:10Herod was a client king, very similar to the way that, uh, we, we have a lot of other

58:14countries that kind of do our bidding in the United States.

58:17And we have a long history of telling countries to do our bidding, um, we're good at it.

58:23What do you want?

58:24Yeah.

58:25And, uh, and something very similar went on then and basically Rome said, Hey, this is

58:30the tribute that you owe to us and we don't care how you get it.

58:35Just pay it.

58:36And then Herod would go around and say, give me my money, uh, and charge taxes to people

58:40based on the tribute.

58:41And obviously Herod would also one for me, one for them, one for me, one for, it would

58:46charge extra.

58:47Right.

58:48But, but Herod was in charge of figuring out how to get the money.

58:52And, uh, all Rome one wanted was, Hey, we'd like this much money from you.

58:57So yeah, there's, there's no, the notion that there was an empire wide census that included

59:03Herod's client kingdom is not supported by the data.

59:07Except for in Tacitus's annals, book seven, chapter 41, a tribe known as the say it right.

59:19See you today. Uh, did I, did I misspelled that? Yeah, it's actually the eye should be

59:27an L and the, the E should be an eye.

59:31So try again to say it right.

59:33I can't.

59:34I don't know what you just said.

59:35You say it.

59:36C L I T A E clite.

59:39Yeah.

59:40Something like that.

59:41Um, okay.

59:42I misspelled.

59:43That's okay.

59:44I just, I should have, I looked up other things.

59:47I didn't get around to looking up what that was.

59:49Okay.

59:50Uh, anyway, in Tacitus, the, the clite, uh, were required to give an account of their

59:58revenue and submit to a Roman tribute, submit to a Roman tribute, even though, uh, they were

60:04subject to a client king named Arkeleus.

60:07Yes.

60:08And this is not the Arkeleus that took over a rule of Judea after Herod died.

60:12This is Arkeleus of Capidocia.

60:13Uh, this is a different Arkeleus.

60:15So, so this is brought up and offered.

60:17That's my preferred Arkeleus actually.

60:18Yeah.

60:19But, um, this is the best one.

60:21Yes.

60:22The Arkeleus, if you will.

60:24Um, and this is brought up a lot.

60:26Um, our, our good friend, uh, inspiring philosophy quoted a, a scholar who brought up this passage

60:33as evidence that's, uh, they would have meddled in the affairs of other clank kingdoms, including

60:39imposing sensus I, sensi, censuses, um, upon them.

60:45And the problem is that's not at all what the text says.

60:49I'm going to read from a translation and then correct some of the translation and then explain

60:53what's going on here.

60:54At the same time, the clite, a tribe subject to the capidocian Arkeleus retreated to the

61:02heights of Mount Taurus because they were compelled in Roman fashion to render an account

61:08of the revenue and submit to tribute.

61:11There they defended themselves by means of the nature of the country against the king's

61:16unwore like troops till Marcus Trebellius, whom Vitelius, the governor of Syria, sent

61:22as his lieutenant with 4,000 legionnaires and some picked auxiliaries surrounded with

61:27his lines, two hills occupied by the barberians, the lesser of which was named cadre, the other

61:32Devara.

61:33It just goes on.

61:34I stopped paying attention.

61:36I don't know what I'm, I, I did too.

61:38Um, but in short, it does not say that Rome imposed a census.

61:45It says that this tribe that was subject to Arkeleus was compelled in Roman fashion to

61:54render an account of their revenue.

61:55Now here's the problem.

61:56Uh, the, it doesn't say in Roman fashion.

61:59The Latin actually says, uh, according to our mode, they were subjected to a census.

62:06Okay.

62:07Now here's the thing.

62:08If you go ask a classicist what's going on here, they will every last one of them tell

62:14you, oh, this means Arkeleus imposed a census upon the tribe that was in his own kingdom

62:23and did it in the Roman fashion.

62:25Right.

62:27And it didn't work.

62:28They objected.

62:29They ran off to the hills and then they were giving Arkeleus trouble and Arkeleus had to

62:33go, uh, Rome, can you help out here a little bit?

62:38And Rome was like, Oh, you again?

62:40Okay.

62:41Send the, uh, we're going to send Trebellius, Marcus Trebellius with a bunch of legionnaires

62:46and some auxiliaries to root out the rebels that you evidently can't handle on your own.

62:53So you're saying they couldn't find the clite.

62:55I'm just going to say, uh, that's delightful.

63:00Look, they were hiding.

63:03They were up under a cleft, um, not always easy to find.

63:07It's not their fault.

63:12Oh gosh.

63:13It's a good thing.

63:14My wife doesn't listen to Papa, um, uh, but I just realized that could have reflected

63:21negatively on me and that was not where I was going.

63:24I'm just not where I was going.

63:26I promise you not where I was going.

63:29Um, but that has nothing to do with Roman posing a census on a client kingdom.

63:35That has to do with a client king imposing his own census and trying to do it in the

63:40Roman fashion.

63:41Cause when Roman poses a sense in census, you don't say Rome is imposing a census in

63:46the Roman fashion as the, as those Romans are ones to do.

63:51Yeah.

63:52You just say they impose a census because they, of course they're doing it in the Roman fashion,

63:57but no, this was a client king doing it as the Romans did, um, like they do on the discovery

64:03channel.

64:04And so, um, it was, this has nothing to do with that.

64:08So yeah, there, there are apologists who will bring this up and it is profoundly misguided.

64:12Yeah.

64:13And that brings us to the final.

64:15Let's, let's do this.

64:16Wait, wait, wait, wait.

64:17We're, we're running long here, but now this, this, this could go on forever, but Luke

64:22two, two claims that the census took place when Corinneas, I'm going to say that name

64:26again.

64:27Cause I slurred it.

64:28Corinneas governed in Syria.

64:30And that would be a reference to the census overseen by Corinneas when he was legged in

64:35Syria, starting in six C.E. after Herod Arkeleis deposed was deposed, excuse me.

64:42And Rome took over direct rule of Judea and needed to know how to text the region.

64:46Yeah.

64:47Okay.

64:48So, uh, the objection you've given me, uh, involves a word that I, I just say pro T or

64:58pro T. Okay.

65:00We're not crushing our throats here.

65:02No, no.

65:03Okay.

65:04So, uh, the objection is Luke two, two uses the word pro T, which can mean earlier or

65:11before.

65:12So the passage should be translated.

65:15This was the registration before Corinneas began to govern in Syria.

65:22And, uh, the problem here is that, uh, pro T, it's actually spelled slightly differently

65:31when it's used to mean earlier or before, uh, is followed up immediately after by a noun

65:38or a participle, uh, or, uh, a phrase that is in the genitive case.

65:46And that is not what we see in Luke two, two.

65:50So there, there are scholars who have been like, yeah, this is, while it's not an, uh,

65:55you know, utterly impossible reading, it is not a plausible reading.

65:59And it's clearly just apologetic in origin.

66:02It is just an attempt to sidestep the fact that Luke two, two would have to have this

66:09census and Jesus's birth dating to six CE, which directly contradicts Luke one, which

66:17has it occurring during the reign of Herod the greater, very shortly after his death in

66:24four BCE, a full decade before Corinneas took over rule.

66:29So, uh, yeah, that, that objection also does not work.

66:33It's not the weakest of all the objections here, but it's far from a plausible objection

66:40to the recognition that Corinneas, uh, had nothing to do with Syria or any census anywhere

66:45near the reign of Herod the Great.

66:48All right.

66:49Well, there you go.

66:50Uh, Apollo, sorry, apologists, uh, you're sorry apologetics don't seem to be cutting

66:56it this time, but next round, they're going to come through with some hardcore stuff.

67:02Oh, I'm sure they will.

67:03You better, you better be getting down to fight and wait so that would, so that because they're,

67:07uh, they're coming for you, uh, friends, thank you so much for tuning in.

67:11If you would like to get an ad free version of this show, possibly get it early, you can

67:17become one of our patrons over on patreon.com.

67:20You go over there, you give us a little bit of your money every month.

67:23We appreciate it.

67:24It keeps our, our family's fed.

67:27And then, uh, you get to be a part of, uh, making the show go and you get access to the,

67:34to the show, to the ad free version of the show, you get, you can get access to the after

67:39party that we do every week, uh, bonus content where you can ask us questions.

67:44It's the best way to actually get us to respond to you.

67:47If you want a response from us, uh, it may not be timely, but we will respond to you.

67:54Uh, so head on over to patreon.com/dataoverdogma to do that.

67:59We always appreciate our patrons the most, but speaking of appreciating people, uh, we appreciate

68:06Roger, thanks so much to Roger Goudy for editing the show and we will talk to you all again

68:11next week.

68:12Bye everybody.