Ep 135: Should Wives Submit?

← All episodes
Nov 1, 2025 1h 00m 49s

Description

Dominion! Do men have it over their wives? This week we're looking at Ephesians 5 where it very clearly says that wives should be subject to their husbands as to the Lord. OR DOES IT?!?

We're going deep into Doc McClellan's linguistic grab-bag to parse out what it actually says. Because ancient Greek is tricky, and doesn't operate the way modern English does.

Then, it's ANCIENT ALIENS!!! Were people in antiquity visited by extra terrestrials? Are the gods and angels written about in the Bible actually aliens from another planet? Pop some corn and break out your faraday cage, because the conspiracy theories are flying fast and furious, and the History Channel might be coming for us!

----

Follow us on the various social media places:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Have you ordered Dan McClellan's New York Times bestselling book ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Bible Says So⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ yet???

Transcript

00:00As conspiracy theories go, okay, you know, no, definitely not, but like, okay.

00:10Hey, everybody, I'm Dan McClellan and I'm Dan Beacher and you're listening to the Data

00:19Over Dogma podcast where we increase public access to the academic study of the Bible

00:23and religion and we combat the spread of misinformation about the same.

00:29How go things today, Dan?

00:31They go.

00:32Uh, things, things, things are trucking along.

00:34I'm pretty excited about today's, uh, episode because a, we're going to uphold the patriarchy,

00:42which we always love to do.

00:45And B, we're going to, uh, we're, we're going to get into some, some, uh, some, some space

00:51stuff.

00:52We're going to get into some, some conspiracy theories.

00:54I hope everybody's got the tin hats ready to go or tin foil hats.

01:00Yeah.

01:01I don't even know if I can say those notes or if that, but yeah, I like that I've terrified

01:05you enough about copyright infringement or trade mark or whatever the heck it is that

01:11we've built a fence around the law as it were regarding, um, my ability to sing anything

01:16terribly.

01:17Yeah.

01:18Yeah.

01:19And, and I think our listeners also thank me for beating that into your head.

01:24When you said patriarchy, all I could hear was, was Fergie in that, um, tonight's going

01:29to be a good night.

01:30Is that what it's called?

01:31Oh yeah.

01:32Yeah.

01:33Yeah.

01:34Yeah.

01:35Where she goes smash it.

01:36So that's all I thought about.

01:37I don't know why it was Fergie's voice doing it that way.

01:40I like it.

01:41I like it.

01:42Well, uh, why don't we get into our, our chapter and verse and smash that patriarchy.

01:48Let's do it.

01:49Okay, so the chapter and verse that we are, that we're getting to is Ephesians 5 verse.

01:57Oh, what verses it?

01:59You know, well, 22 is the main one.

02:02Yeah.

02:03But like, if you wanted to try to get the whole sense unit, it's really got to be like

02:08verse 18 through to the end of the chapter, but we're not going to focus on all of that.

02:14We're really going to, uh, zoom in on verse 22, which is, yeah, you don't want to start

02:19with 18 because 18 says, do not get drunk with wine for that is debauchery.

02:24And we don't want anybody to know that it's in the Bible.

02:26Yeah.

02:27No, no, no, no.

02:28No, no, no.

02:29It's that's actually where the sentence begins.

02:32And this is, this is part of the controversy of, uh, of Ephesians 5 22.

02:38Uh, and if you have heard people talk about this, I'll just read 5 22 just verse 22 on

02:45the NRSVU and then we'll talk about why it's a bit of a mistranslation.

02:49Okay.

02:50It says wives be subject to your husbands as to the Lord.

02:56And then verse 23 says, for the husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is the

03:01head of the church, his body and his himself, it's savior.

03:07So, and, and there's a pill crow in the, uh, in the NRSVUE and for those of you who grew

03:16up on the right side of the tracks, a pill crow, uh, is the little backwards P paragraph

03:22indicator basically, right.

03:24And a lot of translations of the Bible present verse 22 is the beginning of a new section.

03:30It's not even its own sentence.

03:31In fact, it doesn't have a verb in it.

03:35The verb is actually a participle that is in the previous verse.

03:40Now this is actually relevant to what's going on here.

03:43A participle is, uh, is like an ING verb in Greek.

03:49So I am running has a subject, a verb, and then this gerund running, but the verb in

03:57the sentence is AM.

04:00You are saying I and then you are connecting it to running with the verb AM.

04:04So doing run.

04:06Yeah.

04:07So that is the AM is the actual verb of that clause and running is, uh, is helping out.

04:15And so in verse 22, we don't even have a participle, it's verse 21 that has the participle and

04:21verse 22 is just, is just, we're going to borrow the, the force of the participle from

04:27verse 21, but even verse 21 is not its own sentence.

04:31We have to go all the way back to verse 18 and I'm going to, I'm just going to interject

04:36here because the thing that my head was bumping up against.

04:40I don't know how Greek, ancient Greek was structured.

04:44And so like, I know that I've seen, I've seen ancient Hebrew texts and it's just letters

04:50without any spaces and definitely no punctuation or anything.

04:54Right.

04:55What, what, what should I be imagining when I, when I, when I'm thinking of an ancient

04:59Greek text?

05:00Well, same thing.

05:01It was, uh, yeah, the just continuous texts.

05:05They didn't put spaces between the words.

05:08They certainly didn't have verses, uh, in the earliest manuscripts.

05:11They didn't have chapters or anything like that.

05:12And no punctuation.

05:14No punctuation.

05:15They didn't even have, uh, the diacritics.

05:17If you look in a, in a critical edition of the Greek New Testament, you've got rough

05:21and smooth breathings.

05:22You've got, uh, acute, you've got grove, you've got circumflex accents all over the place.

05:28One of that is in the earliest manuscripts, it's just the letters.

05:33So when you say it's not even the same sentence, you're getting that or, or that it is the

05:40same sentence.

05:41You're getting that, uh, just grammatically.

05:44You're not getting that from any kind of markings.

05:47Just syntactically.

05:48Okay.

05:49So the, and this is one of the things you learn to do, uh, when, when reading Greek is

05:54you got to go, okay, where's the verb?

05:56Oh, okay.

05:57There's a verb.

05:58All right.

05:59I'm looking for objects.

06:00I'm looking for subjects and all this kind of stuff.

06:02And Greek is very cool.

06:03In English word order, it, it tells you what role certain words are playing.

06:11So I am running the subject frequently comes first.

06:16If I say am I running, that sounds like a question, right?

06:20Because we've switched the subject and the verb, uh, in Greek, the word order doesn't

06:25really matter too much.

06:27Uh, it is a case-based language and anybody who's learned like German or something like

06:32that will know that you use K in a case-based language, the word form itself changes to

06:39tell you what role it is playing in the sentence, whether it's a subject and object, whether

06:44the thing is being done to it or something like that, you change the way the word looks

06:49in order to indicate that.

06:51And which means you can, you can fiddle with the word order all you want and a lot of ancient

06:54Greek poets would fiddle with the word order like crazy.

06:58Interesting.

06:59Which makes it very hard to translate.

07:02But anyway, we got to go all the way back to verse 18 and it starts with this, do not

07:06get drunk with wine for that is debauchery.

07:10And then we get the beginning of our sentence, but be filled with the spirit.

07:15So we have this imperative be filled with the spirit, right?

07:20As you sing Psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, so one another singing and making melody

07:25to the Lord in your hearts.

07:27So we've got another one of these participles singing, giving thanks to God, the father at

07:33all times and for everything in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, being subject to one

07:39another out of reverence for Christ.

07:42So the being filled with the spirit either is caused by these other things by the singing

07:50and by the giving thanks and by the being subject or it results in the singing, the giving

07:58thanks, the being subject.

08:01And then we get to verse 22, which is again kind of borrowing the participle from the

08:06verse before.

08:07So wives being subject to your husbands as to the Lord.

08:11And an apologist who wants, well, there are actually two people who make this argument.

08:18There are folks who want this to not be misogynistic.

08:24They want this to be something that is not misogyny.

08:28We'll point this out and suggest that the fact that the participle, the verbal force

08:35of verse 21 is feeding verse 22 and verse 21 says, being subject to one another out of

08:42reverence for Christ, you maybe borrow that sense.

08:45And so really what this is saying is wives and husbands, you're both going to be subject

08:49to each other.

08:51So sometimes folks will argue that, but then verse, verse 23 exists.

08:56So right.

08:57Yes.

08:58That's, that's the main problem with this because it then goes on to explain.

09:02Yes, the, the husband is like Jesus and the wife is like the church and, and so the wife

09:10has to submit to the husband as the church submits to Jesus.

09:15But then the other thing that folks who don't want this to be misogynistic will, will point

09:19out is that what, wait a minute, wait a minute, the husband has to love the wife as Jesus

09:24loved the church.

09:25Jesus died for the church.

09:28The husband has to have this self-sacrificing, unending love for his wife, which means it's

09:36fair.

09:37It's okay.

09:38Yeah.

09:39Because while the wife's got to make the sandwiches and got to do the dishes and got

09:43to do the laundry and got to do the, the vacuuming and everything like that, every single day

09:47because the debt, because the husband said so one day, probably not, but maybe one day

09:52he'll have to sacrifice his life for her, but probably not.

09:55And so I, I see that so much in the sort of the Christian Manosphere, you know, when these

10:02guys are talking about how their job is as protector and provider and blah, blah, blah.

10:09And in their minds, when they start talking about this protector role, they bring up scenarios

10:15that are vanishingly small percentage chance that this could happen.

10:20Like, absolutely.

10:21You're not going to get attacked in the way that you're imagining, but they're, you know,

10:25they're making themselves these grand heroes in their own imagination.

10:30Yeah.

10:31It's a power fantasy.

10:33And then, and then their wife is doing very real work labor.

10:38Yeah.

10:39Like continually while he is like, yes, but if this were to happen, you have no idea how

10:47awesome I would be.

10:48Yeah.

10:49I'm going to be over here emotionally masturbating about how cool I'm going to, I'm going to

10:53look when I, when I save everybody's life, I see that a lot of times with every time

11:00there's some kind of mass shooting that, that makes national headlines there.

11:06There are people who are like, I, I conceal carry even where I'm, you know, not allowed

11:11to not to protect me to protect everybody else.

11:15Right.

11:16You know, these things are, are, you know, everybody needs some dude with a power fantasy

11:22about being John Wayne.

11:24Yeah.

11:25Not, not John.

11:26Dirty Harry.

11:27Yeah.

11:28I guess John Wayne too.

11:29Sure.

11:30If men have them.

11:31Yeah.

11:32With gun.

11:33Yes.

11:34I'll come to your college campus and probably end up being the one shooting somebody.

11:41Yeah.

11:4299% of the time being, yeah, I will injure innocent people or kill innocent people.

11:48But anyway, the, that's the idea that they, that they, they run with.

11:52Yeah.

11:53It's like, well, it's okay that I'm in charge of my wife because I'm supposed to love her.

11:59And so, you know, I'm not going to exercise unrighteous dominion, ideally, the realities

12:04that they frequently are.

12:07Well, the reality is that dominion in and of itself is a, is a pretty gross idea.

12:13Yeah.

12:15But what Paul is, not Paul, pseudo Paul.

12:18Pseudo Paul.

12:19Fake Paul.

12:20We should have started with that.

12:21Paul.

12:22Yes.

12:23Oh yeah.

12:24By the way, this is one of the bad epistles.

12:25Well, technically it's one of the disputed ones, like the past Orels, the, the, a good,

12:32strong majority of scholars are like, yeah, that's not Paul.

12:35Okay.

12:36Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, I think it's a little closer to half and half.

12:42Oh, okay.

12:43I think I would still give it to the people who reject Pauline authorship.

12:49But I've, and you know, once I am able to get my survey off the ground, which I'm still

12:55working on.

12:56I'm still working on.

12:57We're going to have a rock hard numbers, but, and abs, rock hard numbers and abs.

13:06Yeah.

13:07I'm going to end the list there and the, the, uh, the, uh, the majority of sc, or a good

13:16number of scholars don't think that Paul was responsible for Ephesians.

13:20Okay.

13:21Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, and there are a number of good reasons for that, but we digress.

13:26So this is probably not Paul anyway.

13:28However, what the author is doing here with this pivot, verse 21 is kind of a pivot point.

13:34We've been talking about the congregation as a whole.

13:38Right.

13:39And then we say, uh, mutually submit to each other and that submitting participle then

13:43becomes the hinge on which we pivot to what's called household codes.

13:49And this is kind of a standard genre in the Greco-Roman period within broader Greco-Roman

13:57literature.

13:58So not just Jewish and Christian, but broader Greco-Roman literature.

14:00In fact, um, what the author is appealing to is a pretty standardized kind of checklist

14:07of the people involved.

14:09And to demonstrate this, I want to read a little something from Aristotle.

14:12Oh, this is Aristotle on government.

14:15Since it is now evident of what parts a city is composed, it will be necessary to treat

14:23first of family government for every city is made up of families and every family has

14:28again, it's separate parts of which it is composed when a family is complete.

14:32It consists of free men and slaves, but as in every subject, we should begin with examining

14:37into the smallest parts of which it consists.

14:40And as the first and smallest parts of a family are the master and slave, the husband and

14:45wife, the father and child, let us first inquire into these three.

14:51What each of them may be and what they ought to be.

14:53That is to say, the hereial, the nuptial and the paternal, let these then be considered

14:59as the three distinct parts of a family.

15:03What are the three things that the author addresses in between verse 22 and the beginning

15:08of chapter six, husband and wife, children and slave people.

15:13So this, this is a pretty standardized way of approaching the question of the household

15:19and how it is governed and we see this in other Jewish literature as well.

15:25So for instance, Philo in some fragments referred to what this fragment is, the hypothetical.

15:32And this is something that you run into a lot when you're dealing with ancient literature.

15:35You'll have authors and you'll have their complete works and then there will be fragments.

15:41And what this is, is this is all the places where we have somebody saying, yeah, so and

15:47so wrote in their text, you know, X, all this stuff.

15:51And it's like, okay, we don't have a copy of X. All we have is whatever this person quoted

15:56from X. And so that goes into the file as a fragment.

16:01But we have a fragment of a text called hypothetical and and Philo says, wives must be in servitude

16:07to their husbands, a servitude not imposed by violent ill treatment, but promoting obedience

16:13in all things. And if we go back to Aristotle and particularly ideas of, of insolment and

16:19personhood and things like that, Aristotle thought a woman was just an undercooked man.

16:24Right. That the gestation just moved more slowly

16:28for women and they were born before they were fully cooked.

16:33Aristotle had an astoundingly weird sense of how a lot of things worked that then was

16:40picked up on and like held as gospel for thousands of years.

16:46And and like the one that there's a there's a friend of mine named Jonathan John. He's

16:51a wonderful psychologist, cognitive scientist of religion. And he in a paper he once commented

16:59the ghost of Aristotle haunts us still. Yeah. Because of how much we rely on definition.

17:07It was so yeah, he's he was a nut that Aristotle. Yeah. And one of the most influential thinkers

17:13in all of human history, obviously, and and actually was profoundly prescient in a lot

17:19of ways about a lot of stuff. And then way off the mark with a lot of other stuff. But

17:25the practice of definition and and our assumptions that everything can can and should be defined.

17:32That's which is the Aristotle. Yeah, don't give me starting in the whole way.

17:36Don't get me started. Don't get me started. So, and then we've got Josephus who is writing

17:46the 90s CE and against Appian. He says, the woman says the law is in all things inferior

17:54to the man. Let her accordingly be submissive, not for her humiliation, but that she may

18:01be directed for the authority has been given by God to the man, which I don't know if the

18:09author of Ephesians would really have a problem with with what sounds that sounds perfectly

18:15in line with it sounds. It sounds quite a fusion, but but yeah, this is very clearly a

18:23systemic power asymmetry, the idea that women are inferior. Therefore, they must submit.

18:29Therefore, they must be obedient. Therefore, the husband is in charge is is misogyny.

18:36I mean, this goes back to the, you know, we talked just a couple weeks ago about the the

18:45ideas of adultery and how and how it's the absolute double standard of like sexual double

18:54standard between men and women. Yeah. Yeah. I, it, I should come as zero surprise to anybody

19:01that, that, that, you know, this patriarchal view is, is what is, is what is being promoted

19:10at that time in this region. Yeah. Like it just, it just seems right. And yeah, and of

19:15course now, as you'd point out, the Greek influence is, is, is permeating the Jewish culture as

19:23well. So you get, you get added and more and perhaps more nuanced patriarchy and, and misogyny.

19:31Well, and, and there are so many different ways. A lot of people don't realize that there

19:35are so many different ways Greek philosophy and Greco-Roman society contributed to Christianity

19:44becoming what it is and contributed to the parting of the ways between Christianity and

19:49Judaism because one of the things that Judaism did, one of the, with rabbinic Judaism, one

19:54of its priorities was trying to divest itself of this influence of the, the Gentile world.

20:03And you know, there are debates to be had about the effectiveness and, and how committed

20:08to it everybody was. But there's a reason that rabbinic Judaism and down to the Judaism

20:16of today is very, very distinct from Greco-Roman period Judaism. And it was precisely a refutation

20:24of that influence. They went back to the Hebrew Bible and said, you know what? We're not going

20:29to do as much philosophizing like Philo and Josephus did. We're going to get back into

20:35the text of the Hebrew Bible and we're going to engage in halochic interpretations, hermeneutics,

20:41which is really just saying, what is the text telling us? And that is one of the things I

20:46think that contributes to Judaism having a lot of positions that are far more closely

20:51aligned with what the Hebrew Bible says than does Christianity, which is far more influenced

20:57by Greek philosophy, not, you know, and not just the Trinity, but the idea of creation

21:02out of nothing, the idea about insolment and abortion, up to and including the enthusiastic

21:13Christian adoption of Greco-Roman patriarchy and, and social conventions. And that's not

21:19to say that rabbinic Judaism was an ally. The, the bastion of feminism that is rabbinic

21:26Judaism. No, no, no, no, no. But it is to say that, that Christianity leaned heavily into

21:34the influence of Greco-Roman social conventions and right and Ephesians, you have it elsewhere,

21:40the pastoral epistles as well appeal to these household code ideas. And really what it is

21:47is it is the authors saying, we like this social convention. We're taking it. This is ours now.

21:54And we're going to come up with a gospel rationalization for it. We're going to explain

22:00it in a Christological way. So you have the author doing that here in Ephesians five and

22:05Ephesians six. But this is the same thing that happens in, in 1 Corinthians 11 with Paul

22:12saying, women have to cover their heads when they're praying in prophesy. Right. That was

22:17just a convention. And Paul's like, well, what if we said that it's, you know, it's about

22:22the Christ is the head of the man. The man is the head of the woman. So therefore, you

22:27know, if a woman's head is uncovered, she's glorifying the man, but she needs to be glorifying

22:31God. So she should got to cover it. Like it's just saying, let's, let's slap a gospel rationalization

22:39onto the Greco-Roman social convention. We're adopting right because we're again lean and

22:46heavy into that. So when, when people talk about, you know, Christians, not caring what

22:52society does, that's the exact opposite of what happens. Right.

22:57We're like, what society does is all that matters. And we're going to come up with rationalizations

23:02for why that's what God wanted all along. Christians were the Jews that, that wanted

23:07to be Greekified and Romanified. And I think that with the destruction of the temple and

23:13with the debates that were going on with the development of rabbinic Judaism with the Christian

23:20following and worshiping of Jesus, those kind of all just contributed to the parting of the ways.

23:26And when exactly that happened, then precisely how is a huge debate that I'm definitely not

23:33going to pretend to be an authority on. You know, since you mentioned these household codes

23:38a couple of times, I'm just going to impress you with my knowledge of Greek because

23:43I was doing some research on this. I did check in with chat GPT. I find it a helpful research

23:53partner, but also I always find good reasons to double check anything it tells me. One of them

24:01being that it said that it quote, it said to me, quote, this passage sits in what scholars call

24:07the household household codes. And then in parentheses, it said Greek

24:12house Tophan, which I'm pretty sure ain't Greek. I know enough German to know that house Tophan.

24:20That's not a Greek word. I'll have to go dust off an old Greek grammar. But but yeah, it doesn't sound

24:27as as Greek to me as as it probably should. Yeah, Greek Greek isn't a Germanic language.

24:36And I just didn't hear about it, is it? No, no, no, no, no. And the Greek word for house is not

24:42house. Yeah. Yeah. We don't go find a gust off to.

24:48Yeah, exactly. So there you go. I, the thing I think that I I like that you were talking earlier

24:58about people who want to try to make Ephesians five, not be misogynistic,

25:10rehabilitated, domesticated, certainly understand that impulse. Absolutely.

25:16Because if you want to be a believing, a Bible believing person who is also respectful of

25:25all of the genders, et cetera, yeah, you're going to not want you don't want that to be

25:31as misogynistic as it sounds. But I think I think we have to we have to just allow that it is

25:38a product of its time and absolutely as patriarchal and misogynistic as as we read it.

25:45Yeah, it is definitely upholding the patriarchy of that that time and place which

25:51yeah, is a problem. And there's a point to be made about the fact that it does makes,

25:57takes some baby steps because in this time period, you know, when we've talked about this before,

26:03how some Roman authors refer to Christianity as a religion for women and slaves because they had

26:11equality. There was a there was a dimension in which they were considered equal within

26:18a Christian congregation. And so you actually for this author to say wives submit to your husbands,

26:26but husbands, you got to love your wives. You have to treat them as not equals, but at least

26:33you have to love them the way Christ loved the church. That's taking a step forward.

26:38And you see this as well with Paul in a lot of different ways tries to assert a kind of

26:45reciprocity, not full reciprocity, but at least gestures in the direction of it.

26:51And, and we've talked about how in some ways that is harmful. So for instance,

26:56the idea that in first Corinthians seven, that the woman's body is not her own,

27:04her husband, it's the property of her husband, but her husband's body is her property.

27:10Right. Like it's kind of saying, well, it goes the other way to right, which is an attempt at

27:15trying to gin up some parody, some reciprocity. It doesn't work, of course, because, you know,

27:22great. What does that mean? It's like saying, you know, the husband is going to beat the wife,

27:27but the wife is free to beat the husband right back. Right. So it's equal. There's no problem.

27:32It's the same. You know, the that passage has been leveraged as an excuse for marital

27:38rape for literally millennia. I was alive when marital rape was not a crime, right, in more than

27:48one state in the United States of America. It's only been since I think like 1993, that it has

27:54actually been outlawed in all 50 states. And I think it's, I think it started in 1971 or 1972.

28:01That's when the first state said, Hey, we're actually going to make marital rape a crime.

28:07Yeah, because people, the patriarchy has always treated marriage as a man,

28:14basically having possession of a woman's body and having rights over her sexual availability,

28:22right, which, yeah, it's sickening. It's not okay. It's not okay. And I think, you know,

28:30one of the themes of our show has been that like you have to reject certain tenets that are

28:38explicit in the Bible, that are explicitly like laid down as though they are laws,

28:45as though they are rules, you know what I mean? And I, but I think one of the things that can be

28:50comforting in all this is that the laws change from Old Testament to new, like the fact is that

28:58laws change, even within the Bible, the law continually changes and modifies itself.

29:05So well, even you can just, and I'll let you finish your point here, but even before you

29:11transition from the Hebrew Bible to the New Testament, things were changing. Yeah,

29:14like you can just look at the, the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible,

29:19already they're reinterpreting stuff all over the place. And that's one of the things that

29:23Jesus was doing too. So I don't want to, I'm just saying this because I don't want to create this

29:28binary between Hebrew Bible versus, versus New Testament. Totally understand that. That makes,

29:33yeah, and that makes sense. The Hebrew Bible actually spans more time and therefore

29:37makes, it would make sense for the Hebrew Bible to actually have more changes even inside of itself.

29:44Yeah. And I think, but I think that that's, that's the key to understanding how a modern

29:49believer should be looking at the Bible, not as a system of laws that apply today,

29:57necessarily, but rather as a snapshot of that time period and the amount that they had

30:05learned up until then. And the fact that it's so, that it's so heavily influenced by Greek culture

30:11and Roman culture, is a, you know, is at very least points out that it's a cultural influence

30:21is important. And as cultures advance and learn more, the laws and the rules of societies should

30:30necessarily change. Yeah. I think there's, there's good reason to be glad that the Greco-Roman

30:40world influenced Christianity. Because I think, I think the collaboration between the two took a

30:47long time to, but ultimately resulted in very good things. I think the Renaissance, I think the

30:52Enlightenment were ways that there were new insights, there were new consensacies. Obviously,

31:02technology changed so much about the world as a result of collaboration between the followers

31:09and the adherence to these traditions and these texts and the world around them. And a lot of

31:15people want to claim that, you know, when it comes to slavery. All the abolitionists were all

31:22originally Christians. Well, that's not totally true, but it was in spite of the Bible, not because

31:28of the Bible. So let's, let's give credit where credit is due. And when it comes to things like

31:33abolitionism, the credit is not to the Bible. The credit is to, is to other things, including the

31:40influence of classical philosophy, which was influential in the Middle Ages and was restored

31:48thanks to its preservation among Muslim and Jewish groups and its translation back into Latin and

31:55all of this stuff. So there's always going, it's always going to be socially contingent. We have a

32:01lot of people trying to insist that it's, it's not that it transcends society. And that's just

32:07demonstrably false. And so don't poo poo on the influence of, of society, because it made Christianity

32:16the many different things that it is today. Yeah. All right, thus endeth my silly little rant.

32:23Our our rants. Yeah, absolutely. All right, we're going to move on to our next,

32:28our next segment. And we came up with a title for this. And it's nerdy and it requires explanation.

32:36And I apologize for it, but it's going to make more sense on the screen. Welcome to the key files.

32:43Okay, so the key files, tell me what the talk, talk to me about what what we're doing here.

32:52So that's just a nerdy Greek joke, right? Yeah, we're just using the Greek character he,

32:58which is written just like the X, the capital he is, is like the X, but this is what you would

33:06see spelled out CHI. So if you're, if you're in a college town and you see somebody going

33:12Cairo or something like that, then they're probably just mispronouncing CHI. But anyway,

33:20it looks like an X looks like X files. Yeah, yeah, it's because we're going to be talking

33:24about aliens. And that's exciting. So we had somebody ask us a few, a few weeks ago

33:34about like aliens and the Bible. And I dove into some stuff. You know, there's that stupid show

33:42on a history channel called ancient aliens, which was a spinoff because they like, they kept doing

33:51like shows about the pyramids or whatever. And this dude with his with this crazy hair would come

33:59on and be like, it was, it had to be aliens because we didn't have the technology to make these things

34:05and blah, blah, blah. And everybody, apparently he was people glommed onto that and him. And anyway,

34:15now it's its own show and has like 200 episodes or something crazy like that.

34:23Okay, but I want, but a bunch of it is to like is about the Bible and aliens.

34:30So let's dive into that, shall we? Yeah. And I want, I want to start by talking about somebody

34:37who this is also depressing that somebody sold millions and millions of copies of books promoting

34:49bizarre ancient alien conspiracy theories, dude by the name of Zechariah Sitchin. Does that

34:56does that name ring any bells for you? I mean, I've got his Wikipedia pulled up right here.

35:00Oh, you do. I'm all over Zechariah. Also, a little bit ironic that Zech that his name is Zechariah

35:08considering that's a that is way one of the texts that we're going to look at is Zechariah. Yeah.

35:13But he, he published a book in 1976. He, he claims to have learned Sumerian,

35:20autodidact, like I'm, that's great if you, if you taught yourself a language like that, but based

35:28on his arguments, he either didn't learn any discipline and didn't learn any method and didn't

35:35learn any theory or didn't really learn Sumerian that well. But he wrote a book, published a book

35:42in 1976 called the 12th Planet. And the idea is basically that we had more planets in our solar

35:48system long, long ago. And one of them was called Nibiru. And this planet is like outside Neptune

35:57or something like that. And it passes close by Earth every 3,600 years. And there was a time when

36:06it collided with another planet called Tiamat. And the idea is that the ancient Sumerian texts

36:14that talk about these gods are actually astronomical metaphors and narratives and things like that.

36:24So Tiamat was an actual planet. The collision resulted in, if, if I remember my 12th planet,

36:31lore correctly, resulted in the creation of Earth. And about 450,000 years ago, the extraterrestrials

36:41from Nibiru, where they had worn out their atmosphere. And they came to Earth in order to

36:50get gold because they could aerosolize the gold. And that could become kind of an artificial

36:59atmosphere that would help them maintain it. Why is it always that like they go after whatever?

37:06It's because everybody's borrowing from Spaceballs. It's all about you're going to be in trouble

37:12because we're going to steal your air. I just feel like I feel like they you choose gold just because

37:18we sort of inexplicably still value gold. Yeah, even though it's not really, you know,

37:25it's just shiny metal. Yeah, but but apparently it's also good for turning into air.

37:33And yeah, it's good for what else you are for what else the Anunnaki anyway. So Anunnaki,

37:39that is a word that that we have in some of these ancient texts that is really just a class of deity.

37:46But for Sitchin, these are to be identified with the Nephilim. Oh, okay. So we're making a connection

37:59between ancient Sumerian texts and the Bible. Yes. And so this is way Sumerian texts and the

38:06Bible and extraterrestrial life forms. So this is an even more expanded scope of univocality.

38:13Right. Where it's it's all talking about the same reality. Right. And the key is to is to get it all

38:21together. And the Anunnaki needed people to work the minds. And so they created through genetic

38:30engineering of some kind, humanity. And so this is and there was some kind of hominid race that was

38:39on Earth. Something went on under the cover of darkness that resulted in the humanity. And so

38:48the Anunnaki DNA ends up in humanity. So and and somehow somehow this resulted in like

39:01eight more books that's where he further fleshes out this theory of the Anunnaki slash Nephilim

39:10and genetic engineering of humanity and all of this stuff and sold millions of copies of this book.

39:18So I just say one of the things that I like about this theory that makes me that at least,

39:24you know, as someone who has read some, I have not studied astrophysics. I have read about

39:31astrophysics. I've learned a lot about astrophysics, but certainly I'm I am no scholar of astrophysics.

39:37But you're a scholar of Dianetics, right? Yes. 100%. But we'll get into that in another episode.

39:43But I like that his thing wasn't interstellar or intergalactic. His aliens were at least

39:51in their galactic, at least from our solar system. And that puts me at ease a little bit because

39:57the the travel possibilities, it makes it that much more plausible, at least physics wise. So I

40:05appreciate that about it. And and unfortunately, there are a lot of people on social media who are

40:11sharing videos, most of them recorded in the 80s and 90s, where people are actually taking these

40:16ideas and running with them and going on TV and talking about, Oh, you know, Elohim is plural. And

40:23and that means it was the gods who created the heavens and the earth. And they and they said,

40:29replenish. What does replenish mean? It means to fill again. It means it was

40:33which it doesn't which it was already punished. And then they replenished it. Yes.

40:40Which is so so misguided. But anyway, that's an example of of one person's

40:47very fecund imagination, just coming up with all kinds of ways to read aliens into

40:55the Bible.

40:56Let's look at some other ways that people have found. Yeah, negotiated aliens into the Bible. And I

41:07think one of the most common ones, one of the most famous is to be found in Ezekiel's vision.

41:15Ezekiel one, verse four, I think is where we ought to start. I'm going to read a little bit of this and

41:22then we'll like, there are 25 verses that that make up the kind of alien part of this, but but

41:30we'll just kind of get a little bit into it. And the thing you have to understand is some of

41:36you are like, just read the damn passage. But the thing you have to understand is,

41:40this is kind of like the book of Revelation, where it's like, and there are, you know,

41:46breastplates were multi colored and like fire and they had the heads of lions and their tails

41:51were like scorpion. Like, and people are like, well, that's how an ancient person would describe a

41:56tank. Yeah, because I didn't know what a tank was. That's exactly like a Apache helicopter,

42:03if you think about it. Yeah, it's exactly like it. They wouldn't know what it is. They wouldn't be

42:08like, well, that's an Apache. So here we go. Ezekiel one for as I looked, a stormy wind came out of

42:15the north, a great cloud with brightness around it and fire flashing forth continually. And in the

42:21middle of the fire, something like gleaming amber. So if you're thinking the movie Independence Day,

42:26where the thing is coming through the clouds, like that's kind of what I think some people imagine.

42:31Okay. In the middle of it was something like four living creatures. This was their appearance.

42:37They were of human form. Each had four faces and each of them had four wings.

42:42Okay. I'm going to just say, that's not a human form. I'm just going to, like, if you,

42:48you can't tell me that they are human form and then, but they have wings and four faces.

42:52That's not how human form is. If the faces look human, then.

42:59Sure. And I mean, you don't, do you have another thing to compare it to?

43:03Just get that. You don't have to say, okay, fine. Go, keep going there.

43:11Their legs were straight and the soles of their feet were like the sole of a calves foot.

43:16And they sparkled like burnished bronze under their wings on their four sides. They had human

43:21hands and the four had their faces and their wings thus, their wings touched one another.

43:26Each of them moved straight ahead without turning as they moved. As for the appearance of their

43:30faces, the four had the face of a human being, the face of a lion. On the right side, the face of

43:35an ox on the left side and the face of an eagle. Such were their faces. Their wings were spread

43:41out above. Each creature had two wings, each of which touched the wing of another while two covered

43:45their bodies. Each move straight ahead, wherever the spirit would go, they went without turning as

43:50they went. In the middle of the living creatures, there was something that looked like burning

43:54coals of fire, like torches moving to and fro among the living creatures. The fire was bright

44:00and lightning issued from the fire. The living creatures darted to and fro like a flash of lightning.

44:06And I think we can just pause here for a little bit, but can I just say you've convinced me,

44:11I believe they are aliens. That description to me is sufficient to say, yeah, we're talking

44:19about aliens. I don't know. I don't know why anyone's arguing with this. I mean, what else is

44:24it going to be? Do you have another category for this? Yes, we do. It's apocalyptic imagery.

44:29Right. This is just and and a lot of people, you know, this is this is one of the things

44:34that convinces a lot of people that they were all on drugs back then. Like not every apocalyptic

44:40author was on drugs. Okay. I mean, it wouldn't hurt to come up with this kind of imagery. I think

44:47I think drugs is a perfectly reasonable explanation for what's happening here.

44:51And Ezekiel looks at the living creatures. I saw a wheel on the earth beside the living

44:58creatures, one for each of the four of them. And here's something that gets brought up.

45:02You've heard of Dyson spheres, right? Yes. So and there was a pain to explain what the

45:08it's a sphere, but like it's like a planet, but you live on the inside. It's hollow, right?

45:14Well, the idea is the idea is this is a hypothesized if there were these advanced civilizations,

45:22what would what we would expect to see a lot more energy coming off these planets unless they

45:31created these things around the planets to absorb the energy. And that would explain why

45:38planets of certain mass, certain whatever might be giving off less energy than we expect them

45:44to give off. And there was a paper and I'm sure I'm getting that very wrong. And anybody out there

45:50who is an expert in this is going to be like, I'm so disappointed in you, Dan. Me too. Me too.

45:55But there was a paper published a bit ago that said, if there is such a thing as Dyson spheres,

46:04here are some candidates. Here are some planets we've identified that would be giving off less

46:10energy than we would expect. And and it was just a hypothetical like, hey, if we imagine that these

46:16things exist, these are a handful of planets that are a handful of celestial objects that that

46:22could be and people took that to mean we've discovered Dyson spheres because people don't read,

46:28and so. But can we just say, like for the sake, just for everyone out there, the concept of a

46:34Dyson sphere is impossible. Basically, like you can't as you wouldn't have the materials, you

46:42wouldn't have the it's just impossible. Yeah. But when we get to this part of Ezekiel, a lot of

46:48people are like, that's what the Dyson sphere is so because they looked at artist renderings of

46:54what a Dyson sphere might look like. But as for the appearance of the wheels and their construction,

46:59their appearance was like the gleaming of barrel. And the four had the same form, their

47:03construction being something like a wheel within a wheel. When they moved, they moved in any of

47:08the four directions without veering as they moved their rim, their rims were tall and handsome.

47:13For the rims of all four were full of eyes all around. When the living creatures moved,

47:17the wheels moved beside them. And when the living creatures rose from the earth, the wheels rose.

47:22What you're saying is spaceship. That's exactly what you're saying.

47:26Spaceship. Yeah. And actually, I tend to think that what Ezekiel is actually doing here

47:32is trying to say that God's throne was pimped. We pimped God's ride by mobilizing it,

47:42giving it these wheels that have to be fantastical and have to be grotesque and have to be all these

47:49things. Because there's a throne on top of a platform on top of wheels. So like the idea which

47:57if you just described it like that, not that cool, but if it's like wheels within wheels and

48:01it's going left, right up and down, you don't know which way. And their blinking eyes all over.

48:06And the reason that I think Ezekiel is doing this, Ezekiel's sitting on the river in Babylon,

48:12they're exiled. They cannot access their God that is way back in the temple in Jerusalem that has

48:18been destroyed. What is us? What are we going to do? We cannot sing the song of Adonai in a foreign

48:23land. And suddenly they hear the rumbling of God's new ride because suddenly the throne,

48:29which used to be stuck in the temple, has now been pimped out. And God can just floor it over to

48:38Babylon and ride his throne on his platform on his wheels to come visit.

48:46He's got a new Cadillac and he is ready to rumble. And it's got eyes all over it.

48:51And so, so I'm going to say, I'm going to say something that sounds a little weird.

48:56It's not that far off to think of this as kind of like a flying saucer or a UFO,

49:02because I think Ezekiel was probably thinking, what if God's throne had wheels and could fly?

49:09So I and we're going to go back to the Hebrew Bible. Well, Ezekiel is in the Hebrew Bible, but

49:17we're going to go back to some imagery that is borrowed from Baal. You know how we feel about Baal,

49:23but Baal in the Eucharitic literature is the charioteer or the writer of the clouds.

49:28And this is a title that is taken over by Adonai, the God of Israel, becomes the charioteer,

49:34the writer of the clouds. And we see in Daniel coming, the son of men, you know, coming in clouds,

49:40riding the clouds. So for God to suddenly be like,

49:43and just cruising over to Babylon in the clouds on this platform with these bizarre living wheels

49:55is just kind of like it makes sense. That's what a stoner from Judah exiled in Babylon might come

50:05up with. I am going to mobilize God. I am going to say though, I think God, if that if your theory

50:12holds, God took some extra stops before he came to Ezekiel. Well, you got to get some snacks and

50:19supplies. Because he came out of the north is what I'm saying. Verse four, a stormy wind came

50:26out of the north. So yeah, so I obviously he like did a circle around, did stuff. Well, when you

50:33when you come to Babylon, you've got to go up over and around because you can't just go straight

50:37across because that's all desert. Okay. And so that's the fertile crescent is is a crescent.

50:44And so when when they left, when you left Babylon to go get to Phoenicia, you went north, you

50:51followed the river, you went north and then you came down from the south. So so yeah, that's not

50:56that's not too far off. But but I think God is like, I got to get some beef jerky. I got to get

51:02some caffeine. I'm going to stop in and get a Turkish coffee real quick. And then I'm going to head

51:07over. I just think I think what's funny about this is, it's totally understandable to me to read

51:17all of this, to to hear the things that you've mentioned about the Assyrians and the whatever's.

51:24And to and then to say, like I can't you can't refute the idea that like, like it's

51:35I'm not going to say it's a plausible explanation. But it is a

51:38I get it. I get it. The difference between a valid argument and a sound argument. This is a

51:43valid argument to say these were aliens. Yeah. And the and they had spacecraft. And this is the

51:52best description that these guys could summon for that. Yeah, I think Stargate, I know what's going

52:01on. It's like I'm not defending it. I'm not excusing it. But I understand. But like, but like,

52:07yeah, as conspiracy theories go, okay. No, definitely not. But like, okay.

52:15So here's here's another one that I'm even more entertained by because I have I have heard this

52:22been described, be described, both as UFOs and as fighter jets dropping bombs. Okay. So this

52:32is Zechariah five. And this is I'm just going to jump right into it because there's no prepping

52:39for this. Again, I looked up and saw a flying scroll. And he said to me, what do you see? I answered,

52:48I see a flying scroll. Its length is 20 qubits and its width is 10 qubits. And I'm googling real

52:56quick how 20 qubits is about 30 feet ish. Then he said to me, this is the curse that goes out over

53:04the face of the whole land for everyone who has stolen as is forbidden on one side has gone unpunished

53:12and everyone who has sworn falsely as is forbidden on the other side has gone unpunished. I have

53:19sent it out said the Lord of hosts and it shall enter the house of the thief and the house of

53:24anyone who swears falsely by my name and it shall abide in that house and consume it both timber and

53:31stones. So I gotta say a flying scroll does not sound to me like a fighter jet. I don't know what

53:40these people are talking about. I think of you. Do you remember the meme where the guy finds the

53:45scroll of truth and then reads it and you know, whatever inconvenient truth is on there? And then

53:51he goes, yeah, and chucks it. That's what I think of with the flying scroll, but it gets better.

53:56Then the angel who spoke with me came forward and said to me, look up and see what this is that

54:02is coming out. I said, what is it? He said, this is a basket coming out. And he said, this is their

54:09iniquity in the whole land. Then a leaden cover was lifted and there was a woman sitting in the

54:15basket. And he said, this is wickedness. So he thrust her back into the basket and pressed the

54:22leaden weight down on its mouth. Then I looked up and saw two women coming forward. The wind

54:28was in their wings. They had wings like the wings of a stork. And they lifted up the basket between

54:34earth and sky. And I said to the angel who spoke with me, why are they taking the basket? Where

54:39excuse me? Are they taking the basket? He said to me to the land of Shinar to build a house for

54:44it. And when this is prepared, they will set it down there on its base. And then we've got a

54:53vision of chariots coming out from between two mountains with red horses with black horses with

54:58white horses and with dappled gray horses. And so yeah, this, this is more apocalyptic imagery.

55:05But but you can, this is where people are like, it's a basket and there's somebody in the basket

55:10riding in the basket. And it has a leaden roof. This is obviously an airplane or a UFO or something

55:18like that, obviously, because you can't imagine the apocalyptic imagination of ancient Judaism

55:24having any actual validity or legitimacy to it. Well, it's so funny because I, you know, just think

55:30about the life of people in that time period. If you're trying to describe, you know, a UFO or a

55:38an airplane or something, I don't think you go with basket. They had carts. They had a whole

55:44bunch of other things. I don't think you start with a basket, to be honest, or a scroll. A scroll

55:50is the worst thing to do. I didn't like, I love the idea of a scroll, a fly a scroll.

55:55Well, it's it that's how you would describe a flying carpet, right? Right. I did, I did come up

56:01with one possible potential justification for saying that a flying scroll could look like

56:06could be fighter jets. The only thing I can think of is you know how sometimes when a fighter jet

56:13goes, it goes through clouds or goes through whatever. And it's got the little off off of the wings.

56:20It's got these little vortex things. Little vortex things. Yeah, that's kind of scrolling.

56:25That's like a scroll. Yeah, not really. I'm stretching here. I'm trying to get these guys

56:32free. But I think yeah, I think probably the most plausible thing is that we could we can just say

56:43they were using metaphors. They were coming up with visual metaphors. Yeah. And we don't have to

56:50say that it was actually a reference to any real thing. Yeah, they didn't have manga back then.

56:56They didn't have anime. Right. They certainly didn't have Disney. They they needed an outlet for

57:03all these all this creativity and and they needed something that and I think one of the main points

57:08of apocalyptic imagery is to be like bizarre. Yeah, because it kind of forces you to to think

57:16about this stuff and to kind of wonder what on earth is going on and it makes you dwell on it a

57:22little bit if you're taking it seriously. And and I think that is part of the way that these were

57:28really speech acts. These were ways to achieve a goal. And and the goal was to get these people to

57:34be like, yeah, don't want that to happen. And you know, so I guess I better

57:39shape up and and ship out or or something right or something. I don't don't know what's the straight

57:45up and fly right? Straighten up and fly right. So that we don't have weird scrolls flying around

57:52inhabiting and consuming houses. Yeah, that's that is grotesque. That's bizarre. And that is

58:01what is intended to be achieved. This is why revelation people have spent so they've just wasted

58:07so many years trying to figure out what all these symbols mean to, you know, the 21st century.

58:13Nothing. It was just imagery imagery. Let it do what it's what it's there to do. You don't have to

58:21yeah, we don't have to be scary. Just just let it just let it be scary. Yeah, be scared. Dang it.

58:30Just be scared. You don't have to like think about what it means. Just be scared about it.

58:34All right. Well, I think I think that the the chances that there actually were ancient aliens

58:44are very low. Uh, but but but I don't think we've disproven it but never zero never zero. I don't

58:53think we have disproven the idea even that these texts were influenced by the visitations of ancient

59:01aliens. Uh, you know, it could well be that that it's not a new bureau. New bureau. Uh, what the Anunnaki

59:12from New Bureau, uh, made Adam and Eve. So and they're coming back one day. Yeah, when the last

59:20thirty six hundred year cycle began. I mean, we got it. It's got to be sometime soon, right?

59:25It's got to be happening in a minute now. You would you would think yeah, maybe maybe next

59:28October 23rd boy. Are they going to be disappointed when they see what we've been up to for three

59:34thousand years? They are. They're going to be so mad. Uh, so there you go. All right. Well,

59:39friends, uh, you know, the best people who listen to this show are the ones who give us their money.

59:45I'm just going to point that out. Uh, only if you can, but if you can, uh, it's super helpful

59:51for us. If you can go to patreon.com/dataoverdogma and, uh, and you know, give at whatever level you

59:59can, we give back in the form of an early and ad-free version of the show every week, as well as,

60:05uh, if you're at the ten dollar a month level or higher, you can go as high as you want. Um,

60:11but if you're at the ten dollar level or a month or higher, you can get the, uh, the after party,

60:17which is bonus content that we do for you every week. Uh, so please feel, feel free, uh, feel

60:25encouraged to go and do that if it's possible for you. Uh, thanks so much to Roger Gaugherty for

60:31editing the show. And thanks to all of you for tuning in. We'll see you next week. Bye everybody.

60:37Data Over Dogma is a member of the Airwave Media Network. It is a production of Data Over Dogma

60:45Media LLC, Copyright 2025, All Rights Reserved.