Ep 8: Contextual Healing with Aaron Higashi

← All episodes
May 28, 2023 1h 03m 52s

Description

This week, the Dans are joined by scholar and fellow biblical TikToker Aaron Higashi. In this interview Dr. Higashi talks about theological context, and the fact that every believer is coming from a particular perspective. He also discusses the perils and rewards of turning biblical scholarship out toward the public.

Find Dr. Higashi's work at:

https://www.tiktok.com/@abhbible

https://www.instagram.com/abhbible/

https://www.youtube.com/@abhbible


Also, follow us on the various social media places:

https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod

https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma

Transcript

00:00(upbeat music)

00:02- And then that sort of got read back

00:03into biblical interpretation.

00:05- We're gonna get back to it, but I have to say,

00:07you keep saying this as though you can interpret the Bible

00:11when obviously that can't be right.

00:14It's the perfect word of God.

00:16- You just avoid all interpretation, am I wrong?

00:19I thought that's how it's supposed to work here.

00:21- Some people think so, some people absolutely hold that

00:24and that's often one of the biggest difficulties

00:27you encounter in trying to talk to people about the Bible.

00:30(upbeat music)

00:33- Hey everybody, I'm Dan McClellan.

00:36- And I'm Dan Beecher.

00:38- And this is the Data Over Dogma podcast.

00:40Welcome to today's episode.

00:42We've got a great one for you today.

00:45- Indeed, we have a guest on.

00:48This is, here's an interesting thing, Dan.

00:50I discovered you when I just on TikTok

00:55when we all sort of during the pandemic dove

00:59into our phones as the last place

01:02that we could find any kind of sanity in the universe.

01:05And, you know, I found your content very interesting

01:09and there was one other guy whose biblical content

01:13I found fascinating and honest and interesting

01:18and engaging.

01:21And that is our guest today, Aaron Higashi.

01:23Aaron, welcome, hello.

01:25Thanks for coming on the show.

01:26- I thought you were gonna say somebody else after all that.

01:28(laughing)

01:29- Not this guy, but this guy is almost as good

01:32as that other guy. - We couldn't get him.

01:34- This guy is like at most fourth down on the list.

01:39- That's a great place to be in.

01:41Hi, I'm very happy to be on the show.

01:44- Well, welcome.

01:45Aaron, you are like Dan, a public facing scholar.

01:51Excuse me, can you tell us a little bit

01:53about your sort of biological, you could tell us about that,

01:57but you're biographical history.

01:58Tell us a little bit about where you're coming from,

02:02how you know so much about the Bible,

02:03all of that sort of stuff.

02:04- Oh, man.

02:05Yeah, sure, I did most of my growing up

02:08in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

02:10I took a first-- - No Christians there.

02:12- No, not a single one, actually.

02:14A voided wasteland of Christianity.

02:17Actually, I grew up like a stone throw away

02:19from a new life church, all these mega churches

02:21in Colorado Springs, non-denominational,

02:24which is like evangelical,

02:25but without any accountability to an institution

02:27or something like that.

02:29So that's the environment that I grew up in

02:31and originally attended church in and high school and stuff.

02:34I did my first take at college

02:36at Colorado State University and for Collins.

02:39I wanted to be a writer, either journalism

02:43I failed out for lack of maturity

02:43or creative writing.

02:47and move back in with my parents.

02:49- And I'm just gonna butt in and say

02:51that there's something very appealing to me

02:55about the fact that I'm the only person on this podcast

02:57who's never failed out of a college

02:59than a kid out of a college.

03:00- Well, it's a great experience, you should try it.

03:02- I'm amazed.

03:03- You're also the only person who's not failed

03:05out of a college in Northern Colorado.

03:08(laughing)

03:09- That's right, the two universities.

03:11- I went to University of Northern Colorado

03:14in Greeley, which is about 30 minutes away

03:16from CSU over in Fort Collins.

03:19I used to go to parties in Fort Collins at CSU.

03:22- They're the best parties or the worst

03:24depending on what you're looking for.

03:27Less cows, more and more alcohol, I think.

03:29- Yeah, it doesn't smell as bad in Fort Collins.

03:33- Differently bad, differently bad.

03:35So after I failed out of there,

03:38I moved in with my parents

03:39and started going to community college.

03:41And I happened across a philosophy class

03:44I took at a community college.

03:45And I just, I fell in love with philosophy.

03:48Also, it was the only thing that I was any good at

03:50because a lot of it's just arguing

03:52and writing, which I love to do.

03:55So I changed my major to philosophy.

03:57I went to the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs,

03:59which has a beautiful campus seated in the mountains there

04:02and central Colorado Springs.

04:03And I took a minor in religious studies

04:08and took the only religion classes they had on offer,

04:10which is like an introduction to New Testament

04:12and introduction to Old Testament.

04:14And that's where I encountered academic biblical studies

04:17for the first time.

04:18I read my first Bart Ehrman book,

04:20which I still own to this day is still marked up

04:23in all my notes.

04:24And I just, it just blew my mind

04:26that you could think about this stuff

04:29from an academic perspective.

04:31I had grown up in this environment

04:32sort of in and out of different churches,

04:34pretty unsatisfied with that experience.

04:37And it just opened like every door in my mind

04:40to, you could do this.

04:42You could spend your life studying this

04:44in a different sort of way.

04:45And so I graduated from there

04:47and I was either gonna go to an applied ethics program

04:50at Oregon State or is gonna go to a biblical studies program

04:53at Providence College in Rhode Island.

04:55Those two things probably seem very different

04:57from each other.

04:58But the underlying goal was the same.

05:00I wanted to figure out how people were interpreting the Bible

05:03and then applying it,

05:04especially in like a social and political context.

05:07'Cause this is back and I'm old.

05:09So maybe not as old as everybody else,

05:12but older than most of my TikTok followers probably.

05:15So this is back in like,

05:17I mean, I went to college in 2004,

05:19started with a graduate in 2008.

05:20So a while ago,

05:21but this is in the middle of the Bush administration.

05:23We have a lot of Bible believe in folks

05:25using lots of Bible as a justification

05:28for this or that political policy

05:30or this or that war on terror

05:31or this or that, you know, funding proposal and stuff.

05:34And I wanted to know what that process was like.

05:36How do we get politics and ethics out of the Bible?

05:40So I was either gonna attack that from either end ethics

05:42or biblical studies.

05:44My then girlfriend now wife got into her dream program

05:47at Brown doing public health.

05:48So we went up to Providence college.

05:51I got a master's in biblical studies

05:53and then because you can't do anything

05:54with a master's in biblical studies,

05:56I applied to PhD programs and didn't get into like any,

05:59but I did get an offer to do a second master's

06:03at Chicago Theological Seminary

06:05with sort of the implication that, you know,

06:08if you take a second master's here,

06:09then maybe we will let you into our PhD program

06:12the following year.

06:13So I did a one year master's there.

06:15- So I'm gonna interrupt real quick

06:17because Dan, you're also the only one here

06:19who has not had to do a second master's

06:21'cause they couldn't get into a PhD program.

06:24- Let's see, it's a rite of passage though.

06:27- It's amazing.

06:27You guys are basically the same person.

06:31- Well, Dan, I'm kicking you off.

06:32Aaron, you're in, I'm tagging him out.

06:35- And for me it was, I had been accepted

06:39to go to Claremont's PhD right after my bachelor's.

06:42But I also got accepted to this master's program at Oxford.

06:45And I was like, no offense Claremont,

06:47but you're not making it worth my while here.

06:52So I'm gonna go to Oxford.

06:53I'm gonna defer 'cause it's a one year master's program.

06:56I was like, I will defer for a year.

06:58If I don't get into a better program,

06:59I've still got Claremont.

07:01- That's a nice backup time.

07:03- Well, it was for a minute,

07:06but I didn't get into a better program.

07:08And then I was like, okay, well, I still got Claremont.

07:10And then they emailed me and they were like,

07:12turns out we're gonna take this year

07:14and just retool the whole program.

07:17So we're not accepting students.

07:19So find something else to do.

07:22And yeah, so then I--

07:24- Occupying time.

07:25- Basically.

07:25And so I had been accepted the previous year

07:28to Trinity Western University's master's degree

07:31in biblical studies.

07:31So like hurriedly emailed them.

07:34And I was like, is your application window still open?

07:37And it was.

07:38And so I was able to get into that most master's program.

07:42So I know exactly where you're coming from.

07:45- Basically the two of you are just bumbling

07:47your way through degrees.

07:48- Yeah, that's kind of how it works, man.

07:50That's how you end up piling them up.

07:52Otherwise it would have been a straight shot, right?

07:54- Yeah, yeah.

07:55- Such is not the case.

07:56I really liked Chicago Theological Seminary's program.

08:01It was the only program,

08:02I remember googling around trying to find one.

08:04And it was the only program that had hermeneutics

08:07in the title.

08:07And that was really what I was interested

08:08at the interpretive process.

08:11- I'm glad you brought that up

08:12because I don't know what that word means.

08:14So if you'll just help me out with that.

08:17- It's really just an obnoxiously fancy word

08:19for interpretation.

08:21But it also sort of came to be used

08:24to describe a field of philosophy

08:27in the continental tradition in particular

08:30that focuses on how we interpret texts in general.

08:34And then that sort of got read back into biblical interpretation

08:37and became a word that interpreters broadly use

08:41to talk about biblical interpretation in particular.

08:43- We're gonna get back to it, but I have to say,

08:46you keep saying this as though you can interpret the Bible

08:50when obviously that can't be right.

08:52It's the perfect word of God.

08:54- You just worried about interpretation, am I wrong?

08:57I thought that's how it's supposed to work here.

08:59- Some people think so, some people absolutely hold that.

09:02And that's often one of the biggest difficulties

09:06you encounter in trying to talk to people about the Bible.

09:11- So I really wanted a program that focused on that.

09:13And Chicago Theological Seminary had a program

09:16called Bible, Culture, and Hermeneutics.

09:18And that's what I signed up for and got into

09:20and really fell in love with.

09:22And that's what my PhD is in today.

09:25So that's how I know at least a couple of things

09:28about the Bible.

09:29I specialize in Hebrew Bible.

09:32You gotta pick something and only really like nerds

09:35and saints do New Testament.

09:36So I wanna do a fun stuff in Hebrew Bible.

09:40- Yeah, nothing nerdy at all about Hebrew Bible.

09:42- That's much cooler, that's much cooler.

09:45- Let me ask you this.

09:47In terms of, you mentioned earlier that when you first started,

09:52when you first realized that this was a study,

09:54an academic study, you compared the academic perspective

10:00to what you had been raised with.

10:01Can you talk a little bit about the difference

10:05between sort of a lay person, a lay believer's study

10:10of the Bible and what you experienced in academia?

10:15- Yeah, lay people tend through no folder.

10:18They're on tend to read the Bible

10:20as a repository of dogma and sort of crystallized

10:25in like a more pure form.

10:27And their job is just to go to the text

10:30and then to derive, sort of re-derive over and over again,

10:33dogmatic beliefs that they're already committed to.

10:36So they believe that God is good.

10:38So they find passages in the Bible

10:40that seem to correspond to the idea that God is good.

10:42They think that Jesus raised us as risen from the dead.

10:45So they find passage in the Bible.

10:47Jesus rises from the dead.

10:48And so the Bible is just a resource to sort of affirm things

10:53that they've already come to believe

10:55as a result of tradition and church practice.

10:57And that's not inherently bad,

11:02but there's a lot more ways that you can interpret the Bible.

11:04And so academics just bring a lot more tools to the table

11:08to be able to engage with the Bible.

11:10So there's historical tools to be able to set the text

11:13in its original context.

11:14There are linguistic tools to be able to get a better grasp

11:17with the original languages.

11:19There's literary tools to be able to parse apart

11:22the different sections of the text

11:23and to speculate about its origins

11:25and its different kinds of theories of composition.

11:29There are more fancy philosophical and ideological tools

11:32to be able to analyze the rhetoric of different authors

11:35and expectations of different audiences.

11:39So it's just, it's an entire bag of lenses or tools

11:44to bring to the text that allow you to ask

11:47more sophisticated questions.

11:49What is this authors, who is the author?

11:52At what point in history might they be situated?

11:55To whom are they speaking?

11:57What are their immediate, spiritual, ideological,

12:00communal needs?

12:02How does this text help serve those spiritual,

12:05ideological, communal needs?

12:07And then asking those sorts of questions

12:09in a variety of different ways over time.

12:12And that's a lot of what biblical scholarship is,

12:15is trying to probe the text with these tools.

12:17And it felt very empowering to me

12:19because before you're not really doing anything,

12:22the work has already been done,

12:23the dogma has already been laid out.

12:25It's a very circular and sort of insular process.

12:28You go to the book for the dogma

12:29that you already had to begin with

12:31and vice and over and over again.

12:33But now you can discover things

12:35or at least put forward new hypotheses

12:37about why the stuff in the text is working

12:40and the way it is using these tools.

12:42And it puts you in charge of the process

12:45of biblical interpretation.

12:47And so for people, I think in particular,

12:50who felt like they had been hurt by the Bible in some way

12:54or by Christian faith or dogma in some way,

12:57the ability to go back and undo some of that

13:00with these tools and to think differently about the text

13:04is an enormous relief and I think can be very healing as well.

13:09- I think that's fascinating.

13:11One of the things that I wonder about,

13:15I love that you're coming at it from that angle,

13:18from the angle of this being a healing process

13:22or this being an empowering process.

13:25I do wonder however, you know,

13:27one of the things that our show has done for me

13:30and that both of your content on TikTok,

13:32you and Dan, your content on TikTok has done

13:36is to expose me to viewpoints about the Bible

13:41that are true, but were I a believer

13:47would be very challenging to a lot of those dogmas

13:49that you were talking about before.

13:52Did you encounter challenge in your academic career

13:56that either made things, made your beliefs?

14:01I don't know, difficult or that rocked you

14:09in some sort of way that you weren't prepared for?

14:12- It's been like a slow,

14:14it's a gradual process over time,

14:16but yeah, it's a, I mean,

14:20what I sort of end up doing is you go to the biblical texts

14:25without, you know, from a different perspective

14:27rather than a dogmatic perspective

14:29and you encounter their morally problematic stories,

14:34you encounter there a God that defies many of your expectations

14:37about what you think God is supposed to be like.

14:40And then you have to do something with that

14:42and that process can be challenging

14:44on a number of a personal professional psychological,

14:47it can be challenging on a number of levels.

14:49I think for me it was still exciting though

14:52because I got to be the one who decided

14:55how to reconcile those things.

14:57It wasn't somebody telling me,

14:58you know, maybe God seems evil here,

15:00but it's really, you know,

15:03it's actually all works out for the good

15:05or it's actually justified that these babies are dying

15:07or that these people are being enslaved

15:09or this genocide is being done or something like that.

15:11I got to be the one who decides

15:14maybe this just isn't God.

15:16Maybe this is just rhetoric.

15:17Maybe this is just ideology.

15:19Maybe this is just something that felt right for them there

15:24at that time or is rhetorically useful for them there

15:27at the time, but no longer has any use for me.

15:30Maybe it did genuinely facilitate some personal, you know,

15:34religious conviction at the time, but now it doesn't.

15:38And so it's, it's, you sort of feel like a monkey

15:42swinging through trees, you're letting grow of one branch

15:45as you are grasping onto another,

15:48but now at least you get to be the one who decides

15:50which branches you are grasping onto

15:52and which you're letting go of.

15:53- And I think that's a big part of a lot of the public

15:57discourse about how we approach the Bible

16:00is who gets to decide.

16:01It seems like a lot of the reasons that the Bible

16:05is not very dynamic, that we already know everything

16:07that it is allowed to say, everything that it says is,

16:11because it's being used primarily

16:13to structure values and power.

16:15It's serving the interests of people largely

16:17in positions of power, whether it is on a national level,

16:21a state level, a congregational level,

16:23even within a family, the Bible can be used

16:28to structure powers and value.

16:30And to say, well, I'm gonna look at it this way

16:33and suddenly that power structure just collapses

16:36as a threat to a lot of that tradition

16:41that has spent so long constructing this approach

16:45to the Bible, this hermeneutic, to protect itself.

16:49And I appreciate a video that you published

16:53a little bit ago where you addressed some

16:55of the different theologies that people bring to the text

16:59and how a lot of these different theologies,

17:01the one that I'm most familiar with

17:03is probably liberation theology is an approach

17:06to the Bible that developed a bit ago,

17:10particularly outside of the United States

17:12as a way to kind of irrigate some power

17:15to the readers and reread the text

17:18in a way that served the interest of the underdog,

17:21which historically has not been the person,

17:24the group in charge of interpretation.

17:27And you said that all these other approaches

17:31to theology, womanist theology, feminist theology,

17:34black theology, queer theology, they all get qualified.

17:38They have these adjectives that are attached to them.

17:42And then you say we presume that white male theology

17:44is the defaults.

17:46And one of your points there was that all theology

17:49is contextual.

17:50It's not like we have decontextualized theology

17:53and then all these other junior theologies

17:57that are developing.

17:58Do you think you could talk a bit about how important it is?

18:02Well, basically what you're saying there

18:06and then how important that is to you

18:07that people understand that there is no objective.

18:11Nobody can stand outside of all these power structures

18:15and all of these lenses and say,

18:16well, no, I'm doing it purely objectively.

18:20- And also in the process,

18:22if you wouldn't mind defining

18:23some of these different theologies,

18:25that would be awesome too.

18:26- Yeah, there are so many different kinds of theology

18:30and so many different ways to parse out

18:33the different kinds of theology.

18:34So most people are familiar with just theology,

18:37at least in principle.

18:38And theology is just God talk or in academics,

18:42it's usually the study of the nature of God.

18:45But that's still very, very broad

18:48and can be broken down in a number of ways.

18:50Some people might be familiar with systematic theology,

18:53which is an attempt to be very comprehensive

18:56and internally consistent,

18:57saying as many things as we can possibly say

19:00about the nature of God and our relationship to God,

19:04using as much data as possible.

19:06So that's systematic theology.

19:08But alternatively to systematic theology

19:11is contextual theology and contextual theology

19:14does not aspire to be either comprehensive

19:17or coherent with other kinds of contextual theology.

19:22It just attempts to speak to the theological imagination

19:26of individual communities,

19:28often with their experience, their historical experience

19:31as sort of the catalyst for doing that theology.

19:35So black theology is going to reflect the community

19:38and experience and spiritual needs of black communities

19:42and feminist theology is going to reflect

19:43the unique experience and spiritual needs of women,

19:46et cetera, et cetera,

19:47through these different kinds of contextual theology.

19:50So there's no aspiration there that they're going to say

19:52everything that can or ought to be said about God

19:55and there's no aspiration there that whatever they have to say

19:59is going to match with what other kinds of contextual.

20:02So black theologians aren't concerned

20:03that what they're saying is going to match up

20:05with feminist theology

20:06if feminist theologians aren't concerned

20:08what they're going to say is going to match up

20:09with Asian American theologians or something like that.

20:13So that's a big division between systematic theology

20:16and contextual theology that you can make.

20:18If you pick up a textbook on contextual theology,

20:22the categories are often given as in black,

20:26Asian, Asian American, Native American,

20:29they are related to ethnic groups

20:31and then to gender and issues of gender and sexuality.

20:34So sometimes you'll see gay and lesbian theology

20:37or queer theology, feminist theology.

20:39And then some that are combinations of these things

20:42like womanist theology, which is both black and feminist

20:47for black women's experience in particular,

20:50but what you will never find in those categories

20:53of contextual theology is white theology or male theology.

20:58And part of that is--

21:02- I think that's what Twitter is, isn't it?

21:04(laughing)

21:06- That's what a lot of things are.

21:08- So I think that's what church is, isn't it, for most people?

21:12- In the United States in a context

21:14where a lot of theology is white evangelical theology,

21:17yeah, that is.

21:18And so that's part of the way that you can claim

21:23the center of discourse is by not disclosing the context

21:28in which you are doing theology.

21:30So it is an attempt to depersonalize or decontextualize.

21:34You're saying my theology is not coming from my experience.

21:37It's not particular to me or the needs of my community.

21:39I am just doing theology, right?

21:42Everybody else is particular.

21:45Everybody else is dependent on the real kind

21:48that I'm doing.

21:49And it is that failure of disclosure

21:53that I was trying to call out in that video.

21:56There's nothing wrong with being a white male theologian

22:00or doing theology from that perspective.

22:03It would be nice if such theologians disclosed.

22:06This is the perspective that I am doing it from.

22:09These are the kinds of personal experience

22:10that I am drawing upon.

22:12These are the communities that I am trying to serve

22:14and who's rhetorical and ideological interests

22:16I have most in mind.

22:18That's all you have to do.

22:19You don't have to be like every time you speak,

22:21I am a white male speaking and doing theology.

22:24Just somewhere in your project at some point,

22:26this is where I'm coming from.

22:28And that's all that really that black theology

22:31and feminist theology

22:32and all these other kinds of contextual theology you're doing.

22:34They're just saying, this is who I am

22:36and this is where I'm coming from

22:37and this is the community that I'm speaking to.

22:39And it seems to me a lot of the folks, a lot of the white male,

22:43folks who are engaged in theology,

22:44obviously I'm one of them as well.

22:46So the degree that I engage in theology,

22:48which I don't really call myself a theologian,

22:51but a lot of is that in our training,

22:54we've never been told that we're engaging it

22:58through these lenses and we're aimed at serving

23:00these communities and these goals

23:03because we've always been kind of the dominant identity

23:08within the field and so we just kind of plot along

23:11as if the whole world is our playground

23:16and we see others saying, well,

23:19I'm doing this from this perspective

23:22and I am engaging my community and doing that

23:25and we think, oh, well, you're limiting yourself.

23:28We on the other hand are addressing this more broadly

23:32because it's usually we don't get training

23:35where we are shown that we are trying to serve certain

23:40structures of power or certain communities.

23:43And I think that's a big shortcoming,

23:45but to do so is then to acknowledge our positionality

23:50and to some degree limits the applicability

23:55and limit our ability to structure power over

23:58and against others who may be operating

23:59in a different field.

24:01So unfortunately, that needs to be called out

24:06a lot more frequently or the field is just going

24:09to continue to train its new scholars

24:11to do the exact same thing.

24:13- Yeah, there's a great book by Angela Parker

24:17who also graduated from Chicago Theological Seminary

24:20called If God Still Breathes Why Can't I?

24:23And it's about how so many theological schools

24:28and schools of religious study effectively train

24:31their students regardless of their race or gender,

24:34how to do white male theology.

24:36So even people of color who come from other backgrounds

24:41are still trained to perpetuate and to speak

24:44as like they are doing white male theology.

24:47So yeah, it's very infrequently that people get access

24:51to these kinds of resources or get taught to think

24:54or speak differently about their,

24:56the kind of work that they're doing.

24:58- Is there a sense that, I read in sort of greater feminism

25:03or in other circles, people talk about intersectionality

25:11and the need for that?

25:14When you spoke about black theology,

25:17not necessarily concerning itself with what's going on

25:20in feminist or womanist theology, that sort of thing.

25:26Where does intersectionality come into it?

25:29- Yeah, well, that's a fun way to ask that question.

25:34Womanist theology emerges out of black theology,

25:37specifically because of black theology's lack of attentiveness

25:41to intersectional issues.

25:42So intersectionality is a way of thinking about

25:47various elements of social identity, gender, race, class,

25:52as though they mutually construct each other.

25:55So you can't look at gender alone, but gender,

25:58the way we think about gender is affected by class.

26:00And you can't just think about race alone,

26:02the way we think about race is affected by class.

26:05And so people sort of lie at the intersections

26:09of their different elements of social identity.

26:12And it was really a number of black women's dissatisfaction

26:17with what was happening in black liberation theology

26:20that led them to then create womanist theology,

26:23which is a much more straightforward attempt

26:26to be intersectional bringing together gender, race,

26:29and class in the doing of other theological work.

26:33- So when a straight, someone who is afflicted

26:37with straight whiteness and maleness,

26:40the way Dan is, for example, or myself,

26:44and they're out there trying to study theology,

26:50how do you recommend that person approach it?

26:54When, as you say, sort of the structures

26:56even in current academia are still pretty geared

27:01toward that straight white male perspective.

27:05- Yeah, fortunately today, I mean,

27:07and we've only been able to say this recently,

27:08but fortunately today, we do have a fair number

27:11of women and people of color and people

27:13from the third world who are actively involved

27:14in the academy, and now they're still minority voices,

27:17but they are present, and so you can go to them directly

27:20and purchase their books and read their material.

27:24And I don't think it takes much.

27:26It's more of the willingness to do a little bit

27:29of that reading that's the difficult part,

27:32but then once you get over that

27:33and you can engage with some of this material,

27:35I think you'll very quickly be able to do the adjustments

27:38or at least the bulk of the,

27:39I mean, it'll probably take the rest of your life

27:41to do all the adjustments.

27:42It's an ongoing, you know, existential process

27:46as it is for so many other things,

27:47but the bulk of the adjustments that need to be made

27:50in a pretty short span of time.

27:52You can pick up a couple books,

27:53learn from a couple black theologians,

27:55feminist theologians, queer theologians,

27:57in a relatively short span of time,

28:00and I think greatly benefit for that.

28:02A book I frequently recommend is called

28:04Liberation Theologies in the United States,

28:07edited by Stacey Floyd Thomas and Anthony Pin,

28:11and it has, you know, 20 page chapter length introductions

28:14to most of the kinds of contextual theology at play today.

28:18You make it through that one book, right?

28:20Just a couple hundred pages and that's already,

28:22you know, you are multiplying your knowledge

28:24of the diversity of theology a hundredfold

28:27in a pretty short span of time.

28:29- I wonder if you could give us some examples of,

28:33you know, different contextual theologies

28:37and how they differ from each other.

28:40Just, it's something that, you know,

28:42we've been talking in the abstract about this thing,

28:44and I wonder if we could, you know,

28:46concretize it in some way.

28:48- Sure, so you can think about, I mean,

28:50a big part of black theology, for example,

28:55is trying to think through, again,

29:00some elements of Christology

29:04that white folks sort of just took for granted,

29:06but are actually quite problematic

29:08for a black community and for a black experience.

29:11So thinking of Jesus as a entirely passive servant figure

29:16for people who have in their historical background,

29:21slavery and household servitude can be a bit problematic.

29:25That's not something worth valorizing.

29:29But if your primary problem is pride and privilege,

29:33then sort of humbling yourself in the image

29:35of this humble Jesus might be some moral progress for you.

29:40But if you've already been consigned

29:41to this place in society, that's not uplifting, right?

29:45That's not something to aspire to.

29:47That's not something as valuable about Jesus.

29:50And so you see a lot of black theologians

29:52sort of reconfiguring the significance

29:54of the incarnation, thinking about it

29:57in terms of Jesus' power to confront authorities in the day,

30:01or Jesus' power to heal the poor,

30:05or Jesus' simple ability to feed large numbers of people.

30:09And they find more value in these stories

30:12as opposed to Jesus' humility or his suffering.

30:17There are a number of feminist theologians

30:18who find Jesus' substitutional sacrifice to be unjust.

30:23They find the idea of God sacrificing a son to be abhorrent

30:28because they cannot conceptualize,

30:31thinking that it's a good idea for a child

30:36to be ordered to their death by a parent,

30:39drawing upon a more immediate and visceral relationship

30:44that women have through pregnancy with their children.

30:47It just clashes too much with their experience.

30:50And so now we gotta rethink some of the significance

30:53of whatever work Jesus is doing in his death on the cross.

30:57So it's often something about the theology they've been fed

31:01does not jive with their experience.

31:04So back to the drawing board to find a way

31:06of thinking about Jesus, or God, or other stories in the Bible

31:12that are gonna work better for their community's aspirations.

31:17- And I think that raises an interesting point.

31:19A lot of communities that's someone

31:23who is used to being in a position of power

31:27might neglect a lot of their experiences,

31:30might not see what they see in the text,

31:32but it's gonna be there.

31:34There are a number of different ways

31:35that the Bible speaks to the oppressed,

31:38the downtrodden, the marginalized.

31:40And that's obviously one of the blind spots

31:44in the majority theology,

31:45is that it's not seeing things from that perspective,

31:49which means it is woefully incomplete.

31:52It is not able to reach everyone.

31:55And I think one of your dissertation,

32:00which you wrote as part of your doctoral degree,

32:04was on Ezra, and we have the,

32:09where Ezra is reading out the law to everybody,

32:11basically letting him know from here on out,

32:14here how things are going to be.

32:16Oh, and by the way, if you married women

32:19from these people groups or these identities,

32:21you have to divorce them and send them away,

32:24which is a remarkably ethnocentric kind of act

32:32that we generally like to gloss over

32:35when we talk about that in Sunday school.

32:37But I wonder if you wouldn't mind-

32:40- Well, one could say that there are those out there

32:43who would love to not gloss over that

32:45and hold solidly to it, even in today's, in now.

32:50- Yeah, again, there's me defaulting to my own experience

32:55with a specific religious community.

32:58But I wonder if you wouldn't mind talking about

33:00how you approached the question of inter-ethnic marriage

33:05and what Ezra was doing in structuring power.

33:10I think you were looking at Ezra 10, is that correct?

33:13- Yeah, Ezra 10 is where it's called

33:15the inter-marriage crisis is discussed.

33:18Ezra is in a very transformational and volatile time

33:23in ancient now Judea, and not really Israelite

33:27anymore history, we're talking about post-exile now,

33:29the middle of the fifth century BCE.

33:33He has the unenviable task of having to reconstitute

33:36the identity of his people in terms that make more sense

33:39to them, and that is primarily to re-think of themselves

33:44as a people whose primary touchstone experience

33:48is coming back from exile and resettling in Jerusalem.

33:52Prior to this, it had been the Exodus.

33:54The Exodus was the defining experience

33:57of ancient Israelite collective conscience and ethnicity.

34:01And now this other thing is coming back from another place.

34:04And part of the way he does that is to draw these very firm

34:09but at the same time, indeterminate lines on the ground

34:15about who gets to marry who, what ethnicity

34:18is really gonna count as this emerging Jewish ethnicity.

34:23We can finally start to sort of use this word Jewish

34:26as opposed to Israelite.

34:28What's gonna be this Judean ethnicity in this time period?

34:31In order to accomplish that, he draws on,

34:33but at that point, several centuries old laws

34:36from various legal material in the Pentateuch

34:40to say that the people groups that surround you today

34:44are similar enough to, although we know

34:47not in literal fact cannot be identical to,

34:51the groups that were existed back then a long time ago

34:54and God said a long time ago, you cannot intermarry with them.

34:57So God is saying now, obviously it must be the case

35:00that you cannot intermarry with these people as well.

35:02You have to get divorced.

35:04This is the only narrative description of divorce

35:07anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.

35:09It's a divorce it's very rarely spoken about.

35:12Even in legal material, there are like couple references

35:14to it here and there and I don't think

35:16there are any other narrative examples of it.

35:18So it's here and it's a mass divorce

35:20and it's a mass divorce that's coerced, right?

35:23Ezra has all the people in the entire region

35:27gather in the temple courtyard under pain of confiscation

35:30and exile from the community.

35:32They are forced to go through this proceeding

35:35in order to determine which marriages are legitimate

35:38and which are not and everyone who's found illegitimate

35:40is compelled to get divorced.

35:42And in the end, about a hundred families are broken up

35:46as a result of Ezra's decree.

35:49So it's a very dramatic moment in the Hebrew Bible.

35:51Again, like Dan said, we gloss over this a lot.

35:53It's not read hardly at all.

35:56I have the ancient Christian commentary series

35:58that has a bunch of commentary

35:59from like the first seven centuries of the church.

36:01Nobody except for bead, the venerable bead

36:06or whatever you say is named.

36:07He was the only person for like the first seven centuries

36:10of the church that comment on this.

36:11And even today we don't continue to read this text.

36:13So it's under red and not reflected on often.

36:18For the past 70 years or so,

36:20biblical scholars and theologians have been trying

36:22to justify what Ezra did.

36:25As we sort of become increasingly conscious

36:27of how bad this kind of ethnocentrism is,

36:30scholars have put in a lot of work to try to vindicate

36:33Ezra's decision to force these people to get divorced

36:36because it's terrible, especially for the children involved

36:38who go off to fates unknown.

36:41We have no idea what happens to the children

36:43of these marriages or to the wise involved.

36:47They could be an immediate threat of death

36:50depending on the circumstances.

36:53So scholars have put a lot of time and energy

36:54into trying to say, you know, no, Ezra did the right thing

36:57and they give various justifications for that.

36:59- Has it generally agreed that this is historical?

37:01- Yeah, I think so.

37:04Or at least that it reflects something

37:07that happened in sort of smaller measures periodically

37:10over the course of a long period of time.

37:13But I haven't seen a lot of attempts to challenge

37:15outright the historicity of the event.

37:19It's sort of an embarrassing thing to admit to.

37:22And it keeps coming up.

37:25Some of these issues return again in Nehemiah,

37:28which many scholars take to be a bit later.

37:30So it seems to be a recurring problem.

37:33It's not just a one-off sort of event.

37:36So what my dissertation did is try to find a different way

37:39to read it without valorizing Ezra,

37:42without finding the meaning of the passage in Ezra.

37:45And instead try to find some moral significance

37:48in what the gathered people do.

37:51And there's this cultural anthropologist named James Scott

37:55who spent some time in Malaysia

37:56studying how peasant communities resist oppression

38:00in these very subtle sorts of ways.

38:02And so I took his work and I applied it to this passage

38:04and I said, look, the people in this scenario

38:07resist Ezra and his demand for divorce

38:11in some of those same ways.

38:13They foot drag, that is to say they take a long time to do it.

38:17They sort of appropriate some aspects of the process.

38:20They demand to have their own native judges involved

38:24in the divorce proceedings.

38:25They do all these very subtle little things

38:27that are easy to gloss over.

38:29But the end result is that only 100 families get divorced,

38:32which is like less than 1% of the population of the community.

38:35And they're almost all priestly families.

38:37So it's sort of backfired.

38:39The second tempo community is like,

38:40you guys out there, you are an existential threat

38:43to our community.

38:44You're gonna ruin the whole thing.

38:45God's gonna destroy us all.

38:46If you out there in these rural villages don't shape up

38:50and at the end of it all, almost all the marriages

38:53or the rule of villages are held intact.

38:55And it's just really the priests who are most on board

38:58with this ideology who end up sort of breaking apart

39:01their own families.

39:02And I attribute that to sort of the cleverness

39:05of the assembly.

39:06- Wow.

39:07I know that there's a long history of,

39:11well, I don't know how long the history is,

39:12but this resistance, I think,

39:15has been discussed in a lot of scholarship.

39:19I know I've worked in Bible translation for a while

39:23and there's an example from a while ago about,

39:27and now I'm gonna forget the language that it was,

39:30but there's a,

39:31oh, it's in Southern Africa.

39:35One of the Bontu languages,

39:38I think there's the translation of the New Testament.

39:43It was initially, for demons,

39:46the translators decided to use this word

39:50that referred to ancestral deities from the local community

39:55as a way to try to kind of influence the locals

39:59into thinking of these ancestral deities as wrong,

40:02as demonic, and so to try to kind of push them away

40:07from continuing to appeal to these ancestral deities

40:11for guidance and for blessings and things like that.

40:13And it kind of had the opposite effect

40:15where they appropriated that translation choice

40:20and began to appeal even more to these ancestral deities

40:26and use the Bible as kind of an icon

40:30as a piece of cultic media

40:33in the petitions, in the interactions with these deities,

40:38and so they had to, the folks from Europe

40:43who were colonizing this area had to come in

40:47and retranslate the Bible so that they kind of cut out

40:52that resistance from underneath the locals

40:56who had basically taken what they had done

40:59as an act of kind of oppression

41:02and subverted that, and I find it so fascinating

41:07when we see examples of that kind of thing,

41:09and I've never noticed that in Ezra,

41:12but that is kind of, they kind of shut themselves

41:15in the foot there and forced themselves to abandon

41:18some families just because they were the ones pushing it,

41:22and I guess they had to go through with it

41:24if they were making a big deal about it.

41:27- Yeah, that's exactly right.

41:29- It is, and that's one of the reasons why I think

41:33contextual theology is so valuable,

41:34these, there's an entire energy for theology

41:39that can only be found amongst oppressed peoples,

41:42that is such an inspiration for the doing of theology.

41:45Privileged, relaxed, comfortable people

41:49can do theology certainly, but there's less of an impetus,

41:53there's less of a need to do it, I think,

41:55and so when you put people in these really desperate situations,

41:59they become very theologically creative very quickly,

42:03and you get to see the product of that creativity

42:06in these contextual theology, so yeah,

42:08they will take translations, they will play with words,

42:12they will subvert expectations left and right,

42:14and they will do everything they can

42:15in order to ensure the survival of their community,

42:18and you get in touch with a little bit of that

42:21through this contextual theology.

42:23One of the things that I wonder about,

42:27because it's very clear, because I loved the examples

42:31that you gave of how to use contextual theology,

42:34and how people use their context

42:38to sort of reimagine the stories of the Bible,

42:44I wonder at what point, are there points at which

42:48it's not a useful exercise

42:53to look at it theologically, and it just needs,

42:57and there are certain stories or certain ideas

42:59from the Bible that you just jettison altogether,

43:04as opposed to looking for ways to recontextualize,

43:07to make it okay, or to find something good in it.

43:11Like at what point are you stretching beyond the bounds

43:16of where that book can actually take you?

43:18- That's an interesting question.

43:20I think there's at least two questions there.

43:23One is, at what point do you stop trying to make it okay?

43:27And the second question is, at what point

43:28do you stop sort of working with it theologically?

43:31And I think the answer to that first part

43:33comes way before the second part.

43:35So I think when we stop making it okay

43:38is a point that we're gonna reach first,

43:40but just because it's no longer okay,

43:42it doesn't mean that you still can't work with it

43:44theologically, it can be used for other things

43:47as an indictment on the original author and audience.

43:51So yeah, I think there are plenty of stories

43:54in the Bible that have no moral value,

43:57or that I just outright don't think personally

44:00God had anything to do with.

44:01I mean, I'm a religious person.

44:03I think there's just, there's no God here at all.

44:06Do you think of like the genocide

44:09or the Midianites in numbers?

44:11I mean, this is presented as a direct command from God.

44:14I don't think you can fix that.

44:16I don't think you can fancy theology your way out of that.

44:20That doesn't mean that you don't say

44:21anything theologically about it,

44:23but it would instead be an example of religious extremism.

44:27Look how bad things can get.

44:30Look how twisted our imagination can get.

44:32Look at how malicious we can become

44:35when we are trying to demonize these other communities,

44:40when we are trying to polemicize against other people,

44:44look at how God can be employed in that harmful work.

44:49So it's not that we stop thinking about it,

44:50but yeah, there are plenty of places

44:52where you just go, that has nothing to do with

44:55any God that I'm worshiping or thinking about

44:57or that's involved in any way in my life.

45:00- And the project of trying to accommodate

45:05those things theologically is going to continue

45:08among those groups of folks who can't accept

45:12that God is not in those passages.

45:14And so I think we need to stay informed about them as well

45:17in order to be able to push back against attempts

45:20to rehabilitate things like the Midianite genocide.

45:25I did one--

45:26- When was that guy that wrote that book length review

45:28of Paul Copens?

45:30- Oh, Tom Stark.

45:31- Yeah, it was like a 250 page review of--

45:33- Yeah, that's exactly what I was talking about.

45:37- So Copan's book is got a moral monster

45:40and Stark's response, which is freely available online,

45:43you can go find in a revised and updated edition.

45:46It's called "Is God a Moral Compromizer?"

45:48And I think it's a wonderful,

45:51it's a wonderful discussion of the problems

45:54with Copan's attempt to rehabilitate this perspective

45:58about God where these are oppressed peoples

46:02who have, they're under the boot of this empire

46:06and the only way they can make themselves feel better

46:09is kind of fantasizing about being on the other side.

46:12And once you get out from under that boot,

46:15those fantasies should not be operationalized any further.

46:19And this is something we talked about

46:21with Bart Erman as with revelation,

46:25people need to find themselves in revelation

46:27to make it relevant, which means finding oppressors

46:31around us.

46:32And for a lot of the folks who are most concerned

46:34about this, they are the ones in the position

46:38of the oppressor.

46:39And so they've got to look for others

46:42who can be vilified.

46:45But I did want to share, I looked up real quick,

46:48the language, it was the Setsuana Bible translation,

46:51the Wookie Bible, which is an old,

46:54very, very classic translation.

46:55But the word for "dimonios," they rendered as "bademo,"

46:59which is a word that refers to these ancestral spirits.

47:01And there's a paper by Musa W. Dubey.

47:05- Oh yeah, what's Dubey?

47:06- Okay, Dubey, excuse me.

47:07I know a Dubey, but it's Dubey there, okay.

47:11And the paper is entitled Consuming a Colonial Cultural Bomb,

47:15Translating Bademo into Demons in the Setsuana Bible

47:18from a Journal for the Study of the New Testament back in '99.

47:21But that was a great discussion.

47:22- Yeah.

47:23- Sorry, I just wanted to make sure.

47:25- No, that's a good context, yeah.

47:27Musa Dubey is a great post-colonial theologian.

47:31She does a lot of great stuff,

47:33especially in that sort of African context.

47:36And you bring out post-colonialism,

47:38which is another framework that can be another--

47:41- Yeah, post-colonial theologian, yeah.

47:44- I wanted to ask a bit about your experience on TikTok

47:47and engaging in public scholarship.

47:49I know you kind of framed this as kind of forced upon us

47:54by the pandemic and being trapped inside.

47:59But now that you have become an advocate

48:05for public scholarship,

48:07have you learned anything about engaging the public

48:09and trying to help them grapple with the Bible

48:14in a more productive, more informed way?

48:16Or are you just decided none of this

48:19is gonna work out in the end?

48:21- Man, it depends on the day.

48:25I definitely found it worthwhile.

48:29I wouldn't continue to do it if it's not worthwhile

48:31because it is difficult, and for me, at least,

48:35it cannot be very time consuming.

48:36I don't know how long it takes you to make TikTok videos,

48:38but it takes me a long time to make even really simple ones.

48:42So it's time consuming and it's emotionally intensive.

48:47I do get, I mean, people will write to me

48:50and they'll say, I never knew any of this before.

48:54This has been so liberating for me.

48:56This has been so helpful for me.

48:58Even up to, I'm considering going back to the church,

49:02sure, I'm considering Christianity

49:03for the first time in my life.

49:05And those things keep me going.

49:08Even one or two of those every few months

49:13is enough fuel to keep me going through all the nonsense

49:17that I put up with on a daily basis.

49:20So I definitely found it to be worthwhile.

49:23It has been very interesting from a learning perspective.

49:27You really have to, it's not,

49:30I think, simplify sort of undersell.

49:33You have to find something in whatever you're gonna say

49:36that's immediately going to be desirable to somebody

49:39who otherwise doesn't know anything about this material.

49:42And trying to do that is difficult.

49:47But you also sort of get to see a new side

49:50of the material that you're looking at.

49:51Like, what is the thing about all this

49:53in this 25 page article or in this 250 page book?

49:57What is the one thing

49:59that somebody completely outside the field

50:02is gonna latch onto and valuable?

50:04And what I've learned is one,

50:05there is almost always something there

50:09and two, it takes a while to sort of boil it down to that.

50:13And that's also been an optimistic thing for me.

50:15I mean, no matter how ivory tower this stuff can be,

50:18there's almost always something there

50:19that could really spark somebody to

50:24to rethink Bible or Christianity

50:27or whatever it is in a new way.

50:29- So would you say that all biblical scholars

50:31should take a few reps on TikTok

50:34and kind of work out that muscle of learning

50:38to distill these complex discussions

50:40down to those aspects, kind of the essence of it,

50:44but also in a way that is going to be

50:49of some kind of interest to the general public.

50:52Do you think that makes you a better Bible scholar,

50:54a better teacher in the classroom?

50:56Or do you think it just makes you a better TikToker?

50:59- That's a good question.

51:01I definitely think more should.

51:02I don't know if all should, but more should.

51:05- I think of some who should not.

51:07- Yeah, some immediately come to mind for the no.

51:11But others, I mean, it is its own thing.

51:14So I wouldn't like shame a biblical scholar

51:17for their unwillingness to come on.

51:19It is its own skill set, it is its own time

51:22and sort of dedication to trying to figure out how to do.

51:25I definitely think more should.

51:27More importantly, I think,

51:29I don't know how you would change this,

51:30but I think it'd be really helpful if the culture

51:32and the Academy shifted in such a way

51:34that this work was just seen as more valuable.

51:36Like, oh, such and such is making content for over there.

51:39Oh, that's a great thing, you know?

51:41Let's get excited about that.

51:43You could go to SBL and have a section on it.

51:45You could do a presentation, you know,

51:47this worked for me, this didn't work for me.

51:49I would love to see more enthusiasm in the Academy in general,

51:52even if people don't participate in mass,

51:54just to have it be wider and more widely accepted.

51:57- I think being able to see it as a part of the Academy

52:00would be wonderful because, you know,

52:03it remains that ivory tower and we're, you know,

52:07pushing the ladders away from the building

52:09of the people who want in to want to see what's going on

52:12and say, no, this isn't for you when we treat this

52:15as something, as a hobby that someone does on the side.

52:18And I think increasingly, this is going to be the way

52:20that a lot of folks who are not able to get

52:24the tenure-track positions and things like that

52:27are going to, one, see their,

52:32what they're producing be consumed,

52:33but two, if they have any hope to make any money,

52:38continuing in something that they obviously have passion for,

52:41I think you're gonna see a lot more people moving

52:43in that direction.

52:45So I, and I think there are folks out there who are doing that,

52:48who are trying to bring it into the mainstream.

52:51And, you know, 15 years ago, there was biblioblogging.

52:55I don't know if you ever saw any of that or got into any of that.

52:59- I don't really know.

53:00- There were a handful of bibliobloggers,

53:03so I was a part of that for a little bit

53:05where we just had blogs and tried to do what I think

53:09we're doing a little more successfully now on TikTok,

53:11but on blogs, which was not incredibly helpful.

53:14It was, again, just us talking to each other.

53:16- Well, Aaron, I wanna jump into this part of the conversation

53:21because I know that it's not all peaches and roses

53:26turning academic study of the Bible public facing.

53:31I'm guessing that, especially since most people

53:35are used to hearing discussion of the Bible

53:37from their church, from the pulpit,

53:39and they're not used to hearing it

53:43from, I mean, in your case, a believer,

53:46but who still, who nevertheless is going to bring

53:49some very challenging ideas into this public space.

53:53Can you talk a little bit about pushback that you've gotten

53:56or if you've received any sort of like,

54:00there must be a little bit,

54:02there must be some blowback to that.

54:04- Yeah, there's a lot.

54:05There's fortunately, I guess I'm lucky

54:11that the kind of pushback that would really bother me

54:14would be, like an all right,

54:18let's see it, you've got actually something wrong

54:20in your video, that would be the kind that I would be like,

54:23man, I really need to fix something here.

54:25That would be the kind that I would really take to heart.

54:28And I don't get virtually any of that.

54:30I don't get like, EVH Bible debunked thing.

54:34People don't interact with it.

54:35Maybe it's just because I'm not that well-known,

54:37but I don't get a lot of that very straightforward

54:40kind of pushback.

54:42I get a lot of the angry TikTok atheists being like,

54:46where's your evidence for God's existence?

54:48I'm like, this is about source criticism,

54:50not about, it's a completely unrelated topic.

54:53And I get a lot of angry fundamentalists

54:55who are like, you're going to hell

54:58or they ask weird religious questions

55:01in the middle of your stuff.

55:03So that's mainly what I get.

55:05And at this point, that sort of weirded me out initially,

55:08but I'm like two years into this.

55:10So I usually either just play with them or ignore them

55:15and it pretty much goes away.

55:17That's been the vast majority of the pushback

55:22that I've gotten.

55:23I do get, I don't know if it's pushback,

55:25but I do get encouraged to talk more about this

55:28or have you considered this?

55:30And sometimes people do ask me questions

55:32about personal faith things.

55:34And I am very, I dull that out in very small amounts.

55:39I don't, I'm about entirely hands off with it,

55:42but I am very guarded about the kinds of things

55:45that I share in that.

55:46I just don't, I don't like the conversations

55:48that start once you start talking about

55:51personal faith issues, that there's no good way

55:53to have that conversation with semi-anonymous

55:56or anonymous strangers online.

55:58It could only be bad.

56:00And so, but I do occasionally sort of encourage/remind

56:04my viewers that, you know, I am a Christian.

56:07I'm doing this from a Christian perspective

56:08at the end of the day.

56:09I teach at a Christian school.

56:11I can't say that I have a pastoral heart

56:14because I think that that's more than I have.

56:18But I am not insensitive to, or insensitive to,

56:22the needs of laypeople sitting in the pews.

56:25And as much as I can, I try to speak to that.

56:28So I have been encouraged/gently given pushback

56:31on do more of that.

56:32And I try to do that where I can.

56:36But on the whole, it's a lot of nonsense

56:40that I've learned to ignore,

56:42as far as pushback is concerned.

56:44- Would you say that your TikTok experience on the whole

56:46has been largely positive?

56:48Or has the pushback been enough to make it a mishmash?

56:53- No, the pushback hasn't really had an effect on it.

56:57I think overall it's been a net positive.

56:59Trying to build a follower bait.

57:03I mean, the most difficult part is just like

57:04the logistics of it, and it can't be kind of demoralizing

57:07to not have anything go viral and to have a very slow,

57:12fall or growth over time.

57:16But that doesn't have anything really to do with pushback

57:21or anything.

57:22That's just TikTok and whatever TikTok is doing

57:24behind the scenes without algorithms and stuff.

57:27- That's the real God, is the other.

57:31(laughing)

57:33So whenever I get depressed and throw out my hands

57:35and I'm like, I'm never gonna do this again.

57:36It's not because somebody said something mean,

57:39it's just like, is this still, am I reaching new people?

57:43Are new people being invited to the table?

57:45That's the only thing that sort of gets me down.

57:49But on the whole, it's been a positive experience.

57:52Both for me and I think for many of the people

57:54who have been watching.

57:56- Well, it's been a positive experience for me.

57:58I'm an atheist and I'm out there.

58:02I don't consume a lot of biblical

58:05or religious themed content,

58:07but I really enjoy what you bring to the table.

58:10I think that your perspective

58:13and your sort of gentle,

58:16but you have this wonderful subversive thing

58:19where your voice is so soothing

58:22and your approach is gentle and kind.

58:27And yet you don't shy away from very difficult topics

58:32and controversial topics.

58:35I find your content very engaging and I really appreciate it.

58:39- No, I'm very glad to hear that.

58:40- And he's not just saying that when I messaged him

58:43and was like, yeah, I think we should have Aaron Agashian.

58:45He was like, oh, is he that guy?

58:46Yeah, that would be great.

58:48- So what Dan's not realizing is that earlier I said,

58:52hey, should we have this guy on?

58:54And Dan was like, yeah, maybe sometime.

58:55And then like weeks later, he was like,

58:58I'm working to get Aaron Agashian.

58:59- I'm working to get Aaron Agashian.

59:00- I have a serious scholarship.

59:01- I've never missed a representative of that.

59:03(laughing)

59:04- You have to get the advisor on first

59:05so that you can pay homage to the people that formed.

59:10Do you gotta do that first?

59:12- And my favorite videos of yours are

59:13the subtly sarcastic ones.

59:17Like when you're complimenting me

59:19and I'm like, see you being sarcastic, I can't--

59:22(laughing)

59:23- No, nothing but compliments.

59:26I wouldn't, I mean, that's, earnestly,

59:29I would not be doing this at all

59:31had it not been for seeing the success of your channel.

59:34I mean, truly, I mean, it would be very easy

59:36for anybody who's interested in doing this to get on.

59:38And if your channel did not exist,

59:40to be like, there's just no appetite for this, right?

59:42There's no interest in this at all.

59:44And so it is very helpful to see somebody do this seriously

59:48and have it been successful.

59:50It's bad in the sense that then I go,

59:52well, it's not successful.

59:55So I can't blame the people out there anymore.

59:58But I mean, the fact that you have been able to do this

60:02means that there are people who have a genuine interest.

60:05And that helps a lot.

60:06So no, no shade at all.

60:09- Well, I appreciate that.

60:11And no one was more surprised about that than me.

60:14I remember when I got on, when I reached 1,000 followers,

60:17I did a book giveaway, but not just one book.

60:20I gave away five books.

60:21I was like, this is a big deal.

60:23And I remember somebody saying in no time,

60:26you'll have a hundred thousand followers.

60:28And I was like, you've lost it.

60:31That would be bonkers to think about.

60:34And that, it didn't happen overnight,

60:38but it happened a lot more quickly

60:39than I thought it would have.

60:40And nobody's more surprised about that than me.

60:44But I understand exactly what you're saying

60:47about the people messaging you, making it all worth it.

60:51I get messages every day from all ends of the spectrum

60:56of love and hate.

60:58So I think you always, I figure that if I'm getting hate

61:03from all sides, then I'm probably right in the sweet spot.

61:07I'm doing something right.

61:10And that does make it all worth it every now

61:12and then I'll find one that will be particularly touching

61:15and like share it with my wife or something like that.

61:18But yeah, that does make it feel like I'm not just out here

61:21and entertaining myself.

61:23I am doing that, but at the same time,

61:25it just seems like it is being helpful for other people.

61:27And if it is helpful for other scholars

61:30who want to break into this kind of activity,

61:34then I will be here as long as I need to.

61:36'Cause that is even more as meaningful

61:40as all the other stuff is to be respected by colleagues

61:44for doing something that I'm really doing

61:46because I could not get into full-time teaching

61:51is something that means an awful lot to me.

61:54So I'm glad to see you're here.

61:57I have no doubt that you're gonna, that you're successful.

62:01We'll multiply and increase exponentially in the future

62:06as long as you keep with it.

62:08- So speaking of this, Aaron Higashi,

62:11how can people find you?

62:13Where are your channels where people now are desperate

62:16for your content?

62:17They're clamoring, clamoring, I say.

62:20- I don't know if we have the authority to say that

62:24is the effect of coming to our podcast yet.

62:27- I'm clamoring.

62:28How do people find you?

62:31- You can find me on TikTok at ABHBible.

62:34You can find me on Instagram at ABHBible.

62:36You can find me on YouTube.

62:39You can search ABHBible and I will come up

62:41or the actual name of the channel is Bible of color.

62:44And a lot of that is the same content,

62:47although I do hope to be producing some content,

62:49standalone content, a little bit longer form for YouTube

62:53over the course of the summer

62:54after things that my kids get out of school

62:57and things settle down a little bit.

63:00I'm still, I'm finishing up final grades

63:02for this last semester at school.

63:03So still a little bit busy right now, but yeah.

63:08And then I don't know, I sort of have thinking about

63:11some future projects, but.

63:12- Well, keep us up to date and let us know

63:16when you have something new that you wanna pitch

63:18and we'll have you back on.

63:19And thank you so much for joining us today.

63:24- I'm very happy to be here.

63:25Thank you very much.

63:26- Well, that's it for today's show.

63:29If you'd like to reach out to us,

63:31you can reach us at contact@dataoverdogmapod.com

63:36or if you'd like to become a patron of the show,

63:40check out our Patreon page, patreon.com/dataoverdogmap.

63:45Thanks everybody for joining us.

63:47We'll talk to you again next week.

63:48- Have a wonderful day.

63:49(upbeat music)