Ep 49: Christian Slavery with Candida Moss

← All episodes
Mar 10, 2024 56m 06s

Description

Did Paul use slave labor to help him write his epistles? Would we even have a Bible without the work of enslaved people? This week, we welcome New Testament scholar Candida Moss, whose new book, God's Ghostwriters: Enslaved Christians and the Making of the Bible comes out later this month. In this book, Dr. Moss explores the widespread use of highly skilled enslaved people, not only as scribes or human dictation machines, but likely in much more creative capacities. Was your favorite passage of the Bible actually written or edited by an enslaved person?

You can pre-order the book here:

https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Ghostwriters-Enslaved-Christians-Making-ebook/dp/B0C9ZP7FB8


Follow us on the various social media places:

https://www.facebook.com/DataOverDogmaPod

https://www.twitter.com/data_over_dogma

Transcript

00:00I don't think anyone is well-served by pretending that Christianity isn't implicated in the

00:09history of slavery.

00:11There are texts within the New Testament that can be used and hopefully should be used

00:16for liberatory goals, but the fact of the matter is if you read the Bible as happened

00:22during abolitionist debates, the pro-slavery group have it, and you have to work really,

00:28hard to ignore a lot of evidence to say that it's an anti-slavery text.

00:35Hey everybody, I'm Dan McClellan.

00:39And I'm Dan Beacher.

00:41And you are listening to the Data Over Dogma podcast where we increase public access to

00:45the academic study of the Bible and religion and combat the spread of misinformation.

00:51About the same.

00:52How are things, Dan Beacher?

00:53Oh man, things are great, there's fun things afoot.

00:58I'm actually really looking forward to our interview today.

01:01We've got some interesting stuff to talk about today.

01:05Me too.

01:06And you just returned from your annual pilgrimage.

01:11I don't know if you do it every year, but you went to Mardi Gras.

01:15This is actually my first time going.

01:18First time.

01:19Okay.

01:20Yeah, it was a lot of fun.

01:21Okay.

01:22Are you giving up for Lent?

01:24Mardi Gras.

01:25Mardi Gras.

01:26Okay.

01:27It's a Mardi Gras for Lent.

01:28That's wise.

01:29It went away anyway.

01:30There was no more to be had, so it was fine.

01:34Right.

01:35Well, let's introduce our awesome guest.

01:38Yes, today we have Dr. Candida Moss with us.

01:42Welcome to the show, Candida.

01:45And Dr. Moss, or Professor Moss, is the Cadbury Professor of Theology at Birmingham University,

01:52not Birmingham, but Birmingham.

01:55And she's also the CBS papal news correspondent, who every time the Pope does something globally

02:03noteworthy, she's called out to go comment on it.

02:07Welcome to the show, Candida.

02:09We're very happy to have you here.

02:10Thanks so much for having me.

02:13And I remember the first time we met, and I think you do too, was when you came out to

02:18Utah to come speak at a little conference that was being held at BYU with some folks

02:24like James Kugel and Pete N's and some others.

02:29And I picked you up from the airport, and I thought it would be funny if I held a sign

02:33with your name on it.

02:35So I printed one out in Greek.

02:39And the first thing you did, and you thought it was hilarious and you had to get a picture,

02:43but then you immediately pointed out that I had the accent wrong, which is what I was

02:49terrified was going to happen.

02:51And I was like, I got a hurry, and I couldn't find a video on YouTube of somebody pronouncing

02:55your name that I could be confident was correct.

02:59So I accentuated the word as the name as if it was pronounced Candida, which is how

03:06I had always heard it.

03:07So I still feel bad about that.

03:09Nevertheless, #nerdjokes, well done.

03:13I feel bad about even bringing it up.

03:15I just thought, well, this pronounces my name, and I didn't even really notice.

03:20So I can't believe I did that.

03:22That was very happening.

03:24No, no, no, no.

03:27And you have a book that's coming out on March 26, and it is entitled "God's Ghost Riders,

03:35Enslaved Christians and the Making of the Bible."

03:40And we're here to talk about this book.

03:43Dan and I have had copies for a bit and have been hopefully reading through them.

03:48We're very excited.

03:49Don't have to be hopeful if you know that you've actually read it, Dan.

03:53Well, I'm not talking about just me, but you're throwing me under it.

03:59Yeah.

04:00Well, you've been busy.

04:01No, I've been reading the book.

04:02It's actually a really fun read.

04:04And actually, so frankly, I went into it with a misapprehension because I went into the

04:11book believing that this was a book about sort of this thing that I've heard plenty about,

04:17which is the enslavement of Christians by say the Romans or by, you know, you hear a

04:24lot about sort of historical enslavement of Christians by other groups.

04:30I think what I had not anticipated was that that's not really what this book is about.

04:35Yeah.

04:36Not at all.

04:37Yeah.

04:38So talk to us a bit about what you're actually exploring in this book and what prompted you

04:46to tackle this subject.

04:50Yeah.

04:51So the book is really about who is responsible for the Bible behold in our hands today.

04:59It's really in lots of ways to talk about labor.

05:02And for me, it was sparked by the fact that about six years ago now, I needed these for

05:08the first time.

05:09These are reading glasses.

05:10I don't actually really need them for this, but if I was reading, I would need them.

05:16And I've written on disability before and I was like, how would I have done this in antiquity?

05:20Would this be the end of my career?

05:24And so I decided to look into it and it became very clear to me that at the point at which

05:28you would need glasses, which might be your whole life, you would need you someone else

05:33to read them right and for Romans, for ancient Greeks, for ancient Jews, for early Christians,

05:39those were enslaved people.

05:42And the more you dug into it, the more widespread this practice became.

05:47And I began to realize this is actually just how people read and wrote in antiquity.

05:52They just use other people for a lot of reasons, it kind of hurts to write for long periods

05:59of time copying a text.

06:03Just enormously cumbersome for someone.

06:06And we sort of knew about them with respect to early Christianity, but it was the kind

06:12of thing I was supposed to be writing a different kind of book or something else entirely.

06:16But I was like a dog with a bone.

06:19As you start noticing this, you just can't let it go and it sort of changes the way you

06:23think about so many things from how the authors of the New Testament were writing to who was

06:30reading texts allowed to, who were the actual missionaries?

06:36And then just like, how do you read this story?

06:39How do you read this collection of texts?

06:41Yeah, you opened early in the book, you told the story of a little sort of almost side note

06:50in I believe it was in Paul's epistle to the Romans, where there's like, we believe that

06:58Paul wrote that.

07:00But then there's this little other thing that's like, it's this little hello in the middle

07:04of it that I wouldn't have made any sense to me if I read it and didn't have your comment

07:11on it.

07:12Talk about that a little bit.

07:13Yeah, so in Romans, which we generally think of as this kind of magnum opus, at the end

07:19in chapter 16, tucked into that chapter, this person, Tercia, says, "I, Tercia, is

07:27who wrote this letter?"

07:29And that's Paul's secretary.

07:31And this is the only one of Paul's secretaries that we have a name for.

07:36And it is what in antiquity would have been considered to be a slavish name.

07:42And he said he greets the church in Rome.

07:46And in other letters of Paul, Paul kind of eludes to the fact that he wasn't writing.

07:50Like he points out what he wrote in his own hand in Galatians, for example.

07:56And when you look at that, you're like, wow, someone else wrote this down.

08:02And I knew that, I sort of knew that, I'm a New Testament scholar.

08:06And I had read people commenting on it.

08:09And they had sort of dismissed this and said, oh, well, you know, he's just a secretary.

08:15Just taking dictation of word for word copying it down is the idea.

08:19Yeah.

08:20And I have to say, like, first off, as someone who's done fairly low state of clerical work,

08:25there's no such thing as just a secretary.

08:28And in fact, you know, like all studies of book work from the medieval period to black

08:35pressmen and the American South to the mid 20th century will tell you that anyone who's

08:41doing this kind of work is actually doing sort of real creative work.

08:45I have a friend who's a provost and her administrative assistant regularly writes emails from her

08:51in her voice.

08:52Yeah.

08:53Yeah.

08:54And then there's this issue of shorthand and it's funny because when I mentioned this before

09:01people online, they're like, they don't have shorthand in the ancient world.

09:04I'm going to make no, no, they do.

09:07We have we have contracts for children who are enslaved to being a parentist to shorthand

09:13experts.

09:14What's different about it in antiquity is that elites can't do it.

09:19It's like a code.

09:21And so if you're dictating, someone is translating what you're saying into symbols.

09:27And as a very personalized system, you would sort of adapt the shorthand symbols to your

09:32needs as a shorthand writer.

09:34It's not standardized the way it was in the 19th, 20th century.

09:39And then you later on have to expand it because it's your special system.

09:44There are some kind of individual styles.

09:47But what that means is, let's say we picture Paul dictating Romans, it's a pretty long

09:52weather.

09:53Let's face it.

09:54All in one go.

09:55Tertius writes it down.

09:57Paul could not take up what Tertius had written down and read it himself.

10:03And only Tertius can then expand it into the letter.

10:06And as he does that, and it's a pretty kind of, it's sort of rough in comparison to modern

10:13shorthand.

10:14So remember, as he expanded what exactly he meant, there's a lot of duplication.

10:18There aren't that many symbols.

10:20And as he did that, he would have edited the text because that's his job.

10:25His job is to make Paul sound better.

10:29And so Roman secretaries, secretaries in the Roman Mediterranean, they are deeply involved

10:37in that process.

10:38They're not kind of fungible workers.

10:41You can't just swap them out, and they are editing as they go.

10:46And people sometimes say to me, oh, well, you know, it's really, it's really Paul.

10:50They just, they just fixed typos.

10:52Can you imagine if there was a typo?

10:56How important that would be theologically, like when you think about how Christians read

11:00the New Testament, we're not casual about it.

11:03Right.

11:04You know, we're like, this preposition means this and therefore Protestantism.

11:08So it's, it's, you know, even if people are going to say these are small changes, which

11:15I'm not sure they always are, but even someone was going to say these are small changes.

11:19That has huge consequences for what people hear in church on Sundays.

11:24Right.

11:25And a lot of times when we're reading the text, we're kind of imagining we're getting the

11:30thoughts and the words directly from the author, the idea that somebody is mediating this to

11:35us, providing a separate perspective and probably a additional education, they may be the one

11:42to say, oh, if you use this phrase, you know, this is from this author over here, and that

11:49would resonate with this over here.

11:51And you have somebody who's pulling things together, who's probably adding a significant

11:57layer of intertextuality, allusivity with other literature.

12:02And so we don't think about that, though, when we're reading Paul, we think, ah, this,

12:07this tastes like, like Paul's language, but probably a significant portion of it is coming

12:14from the person who's mediating it.

12:17That's right.

12:18Because the, these kinds of literate workers are really well trained.

12:22They've been educated.

12:23They learned Homer too.

12:25They, they have a sort of similar education initially to an elite author.

12:29So they are able to kind of improve the style, improve the rhetorical images, perhaps give

12:35input and ideas and, you know, give some examples of this in my book.

12:41But I think we should think of these kinds of secretaries and editorial figures as making

12:46the texts better.

12:49And normally when we talk about kind of secondary figures, we normally talk about copies, we

12:54normally blame them for stuff, you know, so there's a bunch of New Testament scholars

12:59who have blamed Tertius for their inability to read Romans.

13:03They're like, well, these verses are out of order, that's Tertius's fault.

13:07I'm going to reorganize them.

13:09And then that's going to make sense to me.

13:12And that's, that's sort of not how we should be thinking about this.

13:17I think we should be saying this as a collaborative writing project.

13:21And we may not be able to pull apart who did what.

13:24But that doesn't mean we should default to it's all Paul or it's all the evangelist.

13:29And I think one of your chapters, you talk a little bit about how this influences the

13:36way we reconstruct Jesus in our minds, because when we cast our minds back, there are a lot

13:42of gaps that we have to fill in.

13:44And we usually just intuitively without even thinking about it, we fill in those gaps with

13:49things that are familiar to us.

13:51And that is, is one of the biggest problems with trying to reconstruct the ancient world

13:55is we assume there's a lot that is familiar to us and we can just fill it in.

14:00And the reality is it's very different and you describe an early Christian world that

14:05is very, very different from what we think of today.

14:07We have technology all around us that helps us, that aids us to do what we either don't

14:13want to do, can't do or can't do quickly enough.

14:16And the ancient world enslaved people were, to some degree, a technology that was available

14:22to those who who had the means.

14:26But what does this mean about how we, and you talk about the gospel of Mark, what does

14:30this mean about how we reconstruct the picture of the gospel of Mark?

14:36It's composition, how it's talking about Jesus.

14:39Yeah.

14:41So the gospel of Mark, like Allah, our first life of Jesus, and you're right, as his story

14:46ends, I think, anyone who goes to seminary or graduate school, or even if they do an

14:50undergraduate degree and they major in religious studies, you're told, you have to kind of

14:54think your way back into the world that these people live in, their historical perspectives.

15:00And we always say, well, you know, the experiences of the author are important.

15:04What does this mean to a second temple of Jewish person?

15:08That's how we understand what scripture means as scholars.

15:12And when you read the gospel of Mark, and you encounter Jesus who pops out, out of nowhere.

15:21And when I picture Jesus, I picture like an artisanal carpenter, you know, making like

15:27a really nice chair.

15:29And the reason for that is I went to Sunday school.

15:32But that's not what the Greek says.

15:33The Greek says he's a 10th time, which could be an artisanal carpenter, but also might

15:39be a construction worker.

15:40And if I see he's a construction worker, I am picturing something completely different.

15:47And it's still actually highly skilled work.

15:50But in antiquity, it's viewed quite particularly because it's sort of a low status work.

15:56No one wants to end up doing construction markets hard.

15:58You get injured.

15:59If you get injured, you likely die.

16:01And so you have this construction worker.

16:03He is not in the gospel of Mark, the son of a construction worker.

16:09He's just the son of Mary.

16:11There is no mention of a human father in Mark.

16:14That is such a weird gap.

16:16And it's really hard, you know, if you've ever been in the church to not picture Joseph

16:22here.

16:24And I don't think it's that the author of the gospel of Mark thinks he doesn't, that

16:28there wasn't a father there, but it's not mentioned.

16:31And most scholars will tell you that the gospel of Mark is written around 70, just sort of

16:37the destruction of the temple, the first Jewish war, a lot of enslaved Jews, a lot of trauma.

16:45And a lot of women without any kind of support, a lot of widows, a lot of women driven into

16:51sex work by the predicament of that war.

16:54And so when you think about Jesus, no named father, that makes him sound like them.

17:01Potentially like his mother was enslaved, potentially like maybe she had been a sex worker, which

17:06is not what Mark is saying.

17:08It's a gap that Mark leaves for us to make this text speak to us.

17:13And then he wanders around speaking in what we call parables, which are just fables.

17:20And the most famous fabulous ever is Esau, who also was enslaved, also was disliked by

17:28people from his own town and also died of horrible death.

17:32And then you get to the crucifixion and I grew up learning that crucifixion was a punishment

17:39for slaves and for traitors.

17:42And then we all talk about the historical circumstances that would lead people to see

17:46Jesus as a rebel.

17:47And that's certainly, that is a good thing to do to consider that.

17:52But at the same time, imagine that just so many people, including the person collaborating

17:56on this text, this was a punishment for enslaved people.

18:00And you have this figure who, as you read it, he has these slavish undertones to the way

18:08that he's characterized throughout, from the moment we meet him, when he doesn't have

18:12a father, and he gets adopted by God, to the way that he preaches, to even the way he walks.

18:20So there's this weird thing in Mark, the geography's all wrong, all wrong.

18:25It's one of the reasons some scholars will tell you, oh, this could not have been written

18:28anywhere near this region of the world.

18:31This is a bizarre, it's like walking from say South Bend, Indiana, by going over the

18:35top of the lake to go to Chicago.

18:38There's a highway right there, Jessica.

18:41So but in an ancient context, that's meandering, he meanders, and that's a slavish way of walking.

18:49And you can see why, because he is going to die, and I would probably take my time, too.

18:56And then, the way he dies is not very heroic in Mark, but it's a way that would have spoken

19:02to people, to people who would experience the trauma of war, to people who had seen, had

19:09either themselves or had seen other people who were enslaved or low status mistreated

19:15physically.

19:16So I think once you start to think about an enslaved collaborator on this text, you start

19:22to read stories differently, places where you would imagine a friend doing something.

19:28You have to ask yourself, isn't this a person, a friend, or maybe they're enslaved, or places

19:33where you see an English servant, you always have to ask yourself, does it say servant

19:39in Greek, or does it say slave?

19:43Because there's a whole tradition of erasing slavery from high status Christian figures.

19:50And we have not the erasure, but the actual composition of a background for Jesus and

19:56the Gospels that come later, which may not even be contemporary with the composition

20:01of those Gospels themselves.

20:03But this is something that comes up a lot when I'm talking with people about the historical

20:08Jesus.

20:09This is Jesus of Nazareth.

20:13He's not presented as anything other than somebody who was probably born and raised in

20:17Nazareth in the earliest Gospel.

20:21It's the others that have to kind of renegotiate his background to move away from what seemed

20:28to be rather humble, maybe even too humble for their liking beginnings for this Jesus.

20:36Now in your book, you also talk about how there may be humble beginnings for the author

20:42of the Gospel of Mark as well.

20:45This is something I catch a lot of flack for on social media when I talk about the original

20:50anonymity of the Gospels and how they probably had the traditional authorship assigned to

20:58them in the second century somewhere.

21:01But we may, even with some of the mid-second century references like Papius and others,

21:09we may be constructing kind of an artificial author there in Mark.

21:15What did you find out about who, quote unquote, "Mark" might be based on this new framework

21:21for understanding the composition and the circulation of the Gospel?

21:26Yeah.

21:27So let's just start by saying I completely agree with you.

21:30These were anonymous texts, right?

21:32They are anonymous texts that get titles.

21:35And so when I'm talking about Mark, I'm talking about someone calls this text Mark and in

21:40the early century, early second century, Papius does that, refers to a text called Mark, may

21:46not be identical to the text we have, but he refers to a guy called Mark who was the

21:52home in Newtaste, the interpreter or the translator of Peter, who wrote down things.

21:59Somewhat haphazardly is the implication, not, it's not the best writing, but as much as

22:07he could remember.

22:10Now there is an argument that when Papius says not in order that the idea is that it's

22:15not following literary conventions regarding structure and flow.

22:22Is that something that you think is worth keeping in mind or do you think that is an

22:27attempt to apologize for the connection of Papius's Mark with our Mark?

22:35Yeah, that's a good question.

22:38I think Papius is certainly apologizing for the text.

22:42It's not Cicero or Homer or Luke, not that I'm sure Papius quite knows about Luke as

22:52we know about Luke, but it's certainly not Luke, which it claims to be in order.

22:57But the relationship between Peter and Mark is one of subservience.

23:04Mark is taking down dictation from Peter, and why would that, what is that doing for

23:11Papius, claiming this?

23:12Well, he's claiming an apostolic pedigree, and he's presenting Mark as performing a very

23:17servile role, if you go look at all of the pathological evidence for who does translation

23:23work.

23:24It's unless you're in the military, and even then sometimes, you're talking about inside

23:29your formerly enslaved people, people who used to speak a different language that have

23:33been brought elsewhere.

23:37I learned some languages in school, but I don't really remember.

23:40So even if you're an elite and you studied Greek, but you speak, you mostly work in Latin,

23:49that doesn't mean that you're really comfortable reading and writing and translating Greek.

23:55So Mark is being positioned as a figure who's helping Peter communicate with other people,

24:01because Peter doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the box, and his Greek is not going

24:05to be Mark's Greek.

24:07PPS is presenting Mark in this way because there is this idea in antiquity that people

24:13still have today that secretaries, interpreters, these kinds of workers, they're mindless.

24:20They're just kind of faithful translators.

24:23They don't really have agency.

24:25And so PPS is trying to say you can trust that this really comes from Peter, because Mark

24:30is a translator taking dictation.

24:33And Romans think of enslaved workers as mindless as body parts.

24:39That's why we so really hear about them.

24:42And we shouldn't believe that.

24:45Of course they're real people.

24:48But PPS is trying to harm us that argument to say you can trust this text.

24:53It really goes back to Peter ultimately.

24:57And around the time PPS is writing, there's a lot of concern among elite Romans that I

25:01want to get a manuscript.

25:03So let's say the gospel of the two dance, I want the gospel of the two dance and going

25:08to a Roman bookshop, I want to know I have the right gospel.

25:13Yeah, but seeing that the person who wrote down the gospel of the two dance was your

25:20editor, would really reassure me, I'd be like, oh, is your editor who wrote this down?

25:25I feel better about this.

25:27And that is what PPS is saying about Mark.

25:30He's saying that Mark is someone very close to Peter, someone who can be trusted, someone

25:35who does this kind of faithful recording.

25:39But it's not an accurate depiction of who Mark is.

25:41And it's a rare sighting of an enslaved literate walker.

25:51Now in one of the chapters, you start by telling a story about an enslaved reader reviewing

25:56a copy of the gospel now called Mark, and I enjoyed getting to kind of close my eyes

26:05and that stopped me from reading for a bit.

26:08But I read and then close my eyes about this scenario that you paint.

26:14I thought it was instructive to think about the utility of the gospel this way.

26:20Did you talk about the narrative that you paint at the beginning of chapter six in your

26:29book?

26:30Yeah, so one of the things that we know about New Testament text is that they were performed

26:36aloud by readers.

26:38And because of how manuscripts were, you had a prepare, they sort of often weren't breaks

26:44between words or accents or emphasis, so you'd be very familiar with the physical manuscript

26:51to perform it.

26:52This is like a highly skilled role and it involves a lot of forebought.

26:58And so what I try to imagine was the ending of the gospel of Mark.

27:01And if you just open any kind of sort of critical Bible, you'll know that there are separate

27:06endings at the end, at the end of Mark.

27:09And what I wanted to imagine was how did the ending of Mark come about?

27:14And they're all kinds of scholarly imaginings out there already, but what I want to think

27:18of that was performing the text.

27:21And this reader I imagine called Felix, who's preparing to read this at a sort of dinner

27:25party event, which happened, people performed texts.

27:29You kind of have hand gestures, there's obviously tonal voices really important.

27:36You can use gesture to the environment around you to sort of produce a particular kind of

27:41reading.

27:43And then Felix knows he's going to come to the ending of the gospel of Mark.

27:47And the original ending is very underwhelming.

27:53And yeah, you said, you pointed out that it just ends with the, what was the word?

28:00Gar.

28:01Gar, the word for, which is, you know, it's like ending a sentence with a preposition as

28:07a little bit of that, but is this how you, this is how you end a gospel.

28:13And this is, and to be more specific, this is when they show up at the tomb, it's empty

28:18and the word order in Greek is a lot more flexible.

28:23But basically it's saying they ran away, they didn't tell anybody because they were

28:27afraid and seen and that's, and that's your gospel of Mark.

28:32Yeah, and Felix has to perform this for a group of people, you know, probably his

28:38enslaver wants us to be a successful event.

28:40And Felix has read that even if he does his best job, it's, it's not going to come across

28:46well because people are going to look at him and they'll be like, and then what?

28:51You know, they ran, they ran, and then what?

28:53Because it doesn't sound like the end of a book.

28:57So what I imagine is that Felix has heard other gospels, you know, stories circulating

29:01and he decides to sort of like bring a few together to kind of like round it out nicely

29:06and produce a sort of more satisfying conclusion to his performance that night.

29:13And at that event, we might imagine as regularly happened, someone else had bought an enslaved

29:19notary with them to take it down in shorthand.

29:23And that notorious, that shorthand writer has now taken down Felix's version and they're

29:29going to copy it up later onto papyrus and ink.

29:34And between them, these two people have now produced a new version of the Gospel of Mark.

29:40And this would have happened in small ways all the time, right?

29:43You skip a line.

29:45I know there have been times that I've been reading to my kids and I want them to go to

29:49bed and I'll try and skip a page if I care, you know, and in order to do that, and there

29:55will be all kinds of time pressures and things, you know, like Christiana too, and in order

29:59to do that, I have to kind of make up a sentence to connect it to wherever I plan to pick up.

30:05And so we can imagine that there will be places both deliberate like that and not deliberate

30:10where people would have slightly flexibly altered the meaning of the Gospel through performance

30:17and that then might become enshrined in a manuscript.

30:22And I'm sure some people are thinking, wow, she just made that up and they have all kinds

30:27of ancient evidence for thinking that happened.

30:29All I'd like to point out is that other explanations for the ending of Mark often are also making

30:36things up.

30:37Yeah.

30:38So there's one, there's one explanation, there's a scholarship, I'm wondering where Mark is

30:44sitting there and he's writing it and he just finishes that sentence and he gets arrested

30:49and thought, whatever reason, it's not clear and he gets arrested and taken off somewhere

30:54and then released.

30:56And someone had taken the manuscript and then he only gets to add in the next ending later

31:01on.

31:02And I mean, maybe, but we don't have any evidence of it.

31:09Yeah, that sounds like we're, we're ginning up a scenario that's not an evidence so that

31:13we can protect Mark and authorship of the end rather than have to conclude that someone

31:19else came in later and it does seem like maybe they have an agenda and a little bit.

31:25Yeah.

31:26Yeah.

31:27And I think it's funny because we're always like, when we're talking about people changing

31:33scripture, we always imagine they have a theological agenda, they're deeply invested.

31:38What if they just say, as we, as regularly happened with copious, what if they just want

31:43to be done for the day, what if they're just entertaining themselves, there are some amazing

31:49examples of people entertaining themselves in kind of modern book work that you know

31:56that if Bible scholars were pouring over this, they would assume that one person who varied

32:01how they spell the word or how they wrote out 90%, like sometimes in letters, sometimes

32:0790% sometimes 90% space percent written out in letters that if I saw that as a Bible scholar,

32:15I'd be like, we have three different people because 90% is written differently.

32:19And they, when they interviewed, they're like, I was just bored, I needed to entertain myself.

32:24And so what I want to try and imagine is other things that affected this text that we never

32:30think about, just real world things.

32:32I think it might, I'm just going to sort of take a broader view of this and step a bit

32:39away from the book just to say, I think it might surprise a lot of people.

32:44This notion that the Bible itself, not only does it, I mean, Dan can attest to how many

32:54people on the internet spend countless hours in apologetics trying to claim that Jesus

33:03doesn't condone slavery and that slavery isn't there in the New Testament or whatever.

33:12I think it would surprise people to know that like Christians used slaves in the creation

33:17of the Bible.

33:18Did, have you, like the impact of that feels like, like it might be pretty big for a lot

33:25of people who are trying to reconcile their view of what, what the message of Christianity

33:34might be with, with that idea.

33:37Can you talk a little about that?

33:39Yeah, I don't, I don't think anyone is well served by pretending that Christianity isn't

33:47implicated in the history of slavery and that the Bible wasn't used in fact to defend slave

33:55holding in this country, in America, I don't think anyone's well served by that.

33:59And you know, I know, I know what you're talking about.

34:03When I was talking to publishers about this book, there was one publisher I spoke to who

34:08was a sort of former evangelical now more modern Christian and we spoke about it is that you

34:13can't prove this.

34:14You can't prove they existed or they did things that say, oh, I can prove that and here's

34:19the evidence.

34:20And finally, he came to his point because I know a lot of people will struggle with this,

34:23the idea that Christians used enslaved workers, um, funny he came to his point, which is why

34:32do we have to keep talking about, you know, Christians having slaves?

34:38Why can't we talk about all the good things Christianity has done for slaves?

34:44And there was, there was a handpost, um, you know, um, there are texts within the New Testament

34:53that can be used and hopefully should be used for liberatory goals.

34:59But the fact of the matter is, if you read the Bible as happened during abolitionist debates,

35:04the pro-slavery group have it, you know, they have the evidence and you have to work

35:11really, really hard, really hard and ignore a lot of evidence to say that it's an anti-slavery

35:18text.

35:19And the number of stories that Jesus alone tells that use violence against enslaved people

35:26as a key plot device, you know, this is, this is not a text that, that we should pretend

35:34isn't implicated in that world.

35:37And the fact that enslaved workers are involved in it, doesn't mean that we're like, okay,

35:41we're all square, it's both enslavers and enslaved people figured, um, it should cause

35:47us to think and reflect more on the ways in which Christianity has been involved in slave

35:53holding in the way in which Christian texts have been used to support that.

35:57And I think more about how we might push back against that, um, it's work, um, it's a lot

36:05of work if you want to use Christian texts, it's very easy if you just care about basic

36:09ethics and human rights.

36:12So, um, but I think that's a thing that people should think about, um, if they are Christian

36:18and if they're not Christian, I think it is relevant to the history of the modern world

36:25to know how, um, powerful religious groups have been, um, involved in this process.

36:33I think one of the things that people have sometimes said to me online is like, well,

36:37you know, in medieval Islamic countries, they enslaved people too.

36:44They were, um, castry young boys and isn't that terrible Christians who could do that

36:49in the medieval period.

36:51I mean, this, it is true that, um, enslaved unics were not used at the court of, of kings

37:01and quite in European countries in quite the same way.

37:04But the fact of the matter is that almost all of the enslaved children from Africa who

37:09were funneled into those countries, um, that surgery was actually performed at a particular

37:14Christian monastery in Egypt.

37:16So we're talking about monks performing a surgery that had a mortality rate of 30%.

37:22Wow.

37:23Um, so definitely that should give, I think, people pause.

37:27Um, that's the kind of thing that we shouldn't know, not so much as like a sort of self-flagellation

37:34or something, but just because, um, I don't think there's, they can beat honest history

37:38um, without confronting these truths.

37:41That was probably much longer than you wanted.

37:44No, this is, this is exactly, I mean, this is a very important moment in, in American

37:50history right now because we, we're starting to see people moving against the idea of,

37:58uh, honest history and, and looking at the harder parts of history.

38:03We see a lot of, we see a lot of, uh, you know, state legislators who don't want books in

38:09libraries that would make people feel bad about their own, about the, you know, about

38:15their own people or whatever.

38:17And I think you have now given them a yet another book to ban if you're not careful.

38:24I think it'd be a good company.

38:25Yeah.

38:26Yeah.

38:27One of my, uh, when I moved my family out to, uh, to Oxford in 2009, I remember being in

38:33a bookstore one time and finding, uh, series called, and you know, I'm, I have no doubt

38:38you know about this series, horrible histories, um, which is, I, I enjoyed it because I, I

38:44mean, yeah, and I, and I love the artwork.

38:48I, I think the, um, the main, whoever it is, they have doing the, the artwork is incredibly

38:53talented, but it's basically the warts and all history where it's depicting all the things

38:58that are considered, um, you know, gross, uh, violence, uh, inappropriate stuff like that.

39:07And it does it in a, in a, in a frank and, um, very classy way, but, um, you, you mentioned

39:14in the book that, that Christianity was characterized by some of the early, um, non-Christian writers

39:19as for women and slaves, which made me think of, um, two of the earliest, uh, Christians

39:27that we ever hear of in the non-biblical non-Christian literature, uh, uh, plenty's story about

39:33coming across some Christians and he's writing, uh, to the emperor and saying, hey, I don't

39:38know what to do with these, with these Christians, I just, uh, there were two, uh, women who

39:44were slaves and so I, uh, I tortured them and, uh, to get more information from them because

39:50then that was, that was the only way you could, um, that was the only way you could trust the

39:56testimony of a slave was if that testimony had been extracted through torture, uh, and

40:02then he executes them and, uh, and then goes on and say, I, I said if you, you know, if

40:08you'll, um, denounce Christianity or whatever, uh, you can go otherwise I got to kill you

40:14and, and the emperor is like, yeah, you've done good kid, um, so the, some of the earliest

40:20witnesses we have to Christianity highlight the, um, that Christians were frequently women

40:26and slaves, uh, which then in, uh, in later history, um, kind of is, I don't know if it

40:34is intentionally obscured, but, but the way Christianity is represented changes significantly.

40:39Yeah, that's right. And it's not just the plenty of tragic correspondence, which you

40:45referenced, although if you look at modern English translations of that, they're described

40:50as deaconesses. You almost like don't know they're enslaved, even, even in the, in classics,

40:58sometimes you'll see that that's bizarre. How did they stop being enslaved household servants

41:04and start being, you know, the sort of religious role? Um, and that's part of the kind of obfuscation

41:12of early Christian status. The fact that Romans say that Christianity is religion for slaves

41:19and women, it does obviously a slah, but there's a lot of data to suggest that that's true.

41:26We have references to other enslaved people. And when you look at sort of the names of

41:32the people who brought say a text like first climate, which is purportedly by climate of

41:36Rome, and it's sent to a church in Corinth. When you look at their names, their names are

41:42as slave names, fortune artists, like just lucky, you know, sort of, um, apofrotitus,

41:52you know, the most common name for enslaved people. And, and you see them all over the

41:58place, our first portrait of Jesus, and it is a caricature making fun of another enslaved

42:04child, but it's from a school room for enslaved children. That's our first portrait of Jesus.

42:12And the person, the child who made it is making fun of a Christian child who's there. And,

42:17you know, sometimes people want to say, Oh, well, this is persecution. And we can know

42:21this, this is playground bullying, um, at worst. And if you look at the other graffiti

42:27there, you're like, Oh, these kids are horrible to each other. And so that's not inconsequential

42:34that kind of data. And you can see why Christianity appeals to people. It's sort of beyond the

42:44sort of like the promise of sort of equality before God and heavenly rewards and punishment

42:51in a slave person for everyone who had treated them poorly. This is a religion about someone

42:57who had died at the death of an enslaved person who was apparently a God who took on according

43:02to full the form of a slave. There's a lot there for you. And you can see why it would

43:09appeal to people from those kinds of backgrounds. And Paul is repeatedly characterizing the

43:14ideal relationship between the Christian and Jesus as one of enslaved. Yeah, we don't

43:20take that seriously. And you're talking about the Alexa Menos graffiti corrects with this

43:35early playground bullying. And there's an Alexa Menos is mentioned in another room. Isn't

43:41there another graffiti where it says Alexa Menos is faithful or something like that?

43:45There are some people doubt the historicity of that particular graffiti. And this is like

43:52a problem with things that were discovered between the 17th century and the 19th century

43:58in Rome. It was a very pious period of archaeological excavation. But there are all kinds of reasons

44:08to sort of link this image, this idea of fidelity specifically with enslaved people, my classicist

44:16who reviewed all of the kind of funerary monuments, but formerly enslaved people for

44:21freedom. Revealed that being faithful, you know, we, the Latin D days, the Greek pisters,

44:31the language that we today hear as faith, you know, belief in Jesus, which at the time

44:36meant more sort of loyal. That's one of the most common words to find on a tombstone for

44:45an enslaved or familiar slave person that they were faithful. And we don't hear that anymore

44:51when we read the Bible. I hear Luther instead. But we should hear this. We should hear echoes

44:58of slavish virtues. You know, you mentioned that graffiti, though, you have a line drawing

45:04in your book of it that seems really good. It was done. I feel like whoever you got to

45:10do that, man, that was done. Yeah, I would I would even recommend him. Yeah. Dan, I'm

45:19going to specify Dan Collins. Thank you so much for doing this. Yeah, well, I was glad

45:24to be able to help. And I'm I hope I get a better version of this book where the images

45:31come through. I can't figure that out. But I was I was pleased to I was I was flipping

45:40through the book one day and I saw my last name on one page and I was like, what the?

45:44And then I was like, Oh, yeah, this is the book that those illustrations were for. Wonderful.

45:49And the Alexa Menos graffiti. If anybody doesn't know, this is where Jesus is pictured hanging

45:53on the cross with the head of an ass. And then Alexa Menos, whose face is drawn very carefully.

46:00It's a it's very skilled drawing is is kneeling before the cross and it says Alexa Menos worship

46:08surfers is or God. And so it's it's a pretty sick burn. And I think probably the second

46:17earliest artistic depiction of crucifixion that we have, I think there's another one from

46:24outside of Rome that is a little bit earlier, but a pretty, pretty important artifact in

46:32its own right. In addition to what it tells us about, about schoolyard bullying in the

46:41end of second or the beginning of third century room. Yeah, and that donkey hat is also that's

46:47not some kind of odd coincidence. A lot of people were talking about Jesus in that way

46:52because donkeys were associated with slavery. And so it is sort of implying you stupid child

47:01worshiping a God who was crucified. And it's clearly a slave. That's clearly a depiction

47:05of Jesus in his way. No, what is it? What does it change for you in terms of how you see Jesus

47:14as a figure? Because yeah, you mentioned it earlier, but but it feels like that is a very

47:23different view of Jesus. And if Jesus, if we think of Jesus as an enslaved person or or

47:30or at least sort of in the position, maybe even a figurative position of the enslaved

47:37person, what does that change for you in terms of how we should be interpreting his message?

47:43Yeah, so for me, they're all kinds of like small, you know, historian, Bible scholar,

47:50little things that I'm like, Oh, that makes much more sense to me. I think like many scholars,

47:55I'm pretty skeptical about the extent to which we can speak about Jesus of Nazareth,

48:00who he was and what he did. But for me, what's really powerful about this is in this earliest

48:07mayor of tradition, people are characterizing him in this way as this kind of, let's say,

48:17slavish figure. And that idea, that image of someone who once once you start thinking

48:25of it in that way, you read his interactions with people differently. As someone who sees

48:32other marginalized people, you start reading other characters in the story as also enslaved.

48:42And you see the extent to which he is speaking to them, interacting with them, offering things

48:47to them. Mark has always been my favorite gospel. And, you know, if you're in Sunday

48:53school, people will tell you it's the human Jesus, you know, he feels and stuff. The me

49:00though, he's not he's not just human. It's not deity human. This is a person is the most

49:07marginalized, the most vulnerable. And for me, I think that says a really powerful message

49:14about whom people care about these texts. Think Jesus is who they think who they think the

49:20Bible is for who they imagine themselves reading with when they read it. Um, some people a

49:29little resistant to this. They like, they like Christ, the king kind of thing. Um, there's

49:36nothing about Christian theology that's sort of at odds with this specifically, the specific

49:42idea of a, of a suffering God. And it is this particular kind of Jesus, the Jesus of Mark

49:48that resonates with marginalized communities today. Yeah, it makes sense to me when, you

49:55know, when, when we're thinking of the Jesus who says, you know, it's easier for a camel

50:00to get through the eye of a needle than a rich man to get into heaven. That's, that's

50:04not, that's not the, that's not the, that's not the pronouncement of a person who was born

50:09into wealth or who is, or who, or who appreciates wealth as a, as a virtue, you know what I mean?

50:14This is, it makes much more sense for that to be a pronouncement of a, of, of someone who,

50:20who under, who sides with at least the poor and the marginalized. Yeah. Over and over again.

50:28I mean, it's the most consistent moral teaching of the New Testament and the collection of

50:32texts that do not agree with one another on very much. They do agree with, they do agree

50:37about the perils of wealth and that if you are very wealthy, you are already very dangerous

50:43situation when it comes to your personal salvation. Yeah. And a lot of the, I am struck by, it

50:53seemed to me that one of the points of this book was to try to make a little more visible

50:56what is commonly invisible. I mentioned earlier, slave people were in a sense kind of a technology

51:04that that people had. And just like we don't make explicit reference to the technologies

51:09that we use every day. There are not a lot of direct references to this. It's easy for

51:14these things to, for these people to be dehumanized and to be treated as technology, which is

51:22a story that we see kind of throughout the Bible, you have ancient Israel being reminded,

51:28Hey, you were slave enslaved in Egypt. So you were foreigners in a foreign land. You

51:35were all these things. So be kind to these people. And we in the New Testament, we have

51:41this relationship is is brought up once again and how we should be related to to Jesus enslaved

51:51to Jesus. Could you talk a little bit about how you're trying to bring the invisible or

51:59make the invisible visible with this book? Yeah, that's definitely, and I don't think

52:05I'm concealing this part of the agenda of the book is about making invisible workers visible

52:13in the past and in the present. We still do this today. You know, Amazon delivers things.

52:19Amazon does not deliver anything. Jeff Bezos did not take time out from his yacht to bring

52:26me whatever people did invisible people. When we talk about having our houses decorated,

52:36or we decorated our house, we've redid our bathroom. In most cases, that is not true.

52:43You did not work yourself. And while you may have picked out tile, you didn't make any

52:48of the decisions, because there are so many decisions that are about the experience of

52:53working with the materials, knowing where something is going to break when you cut it.

52:58You don't know until you get into the walls exactly what's there. If you can if you can

53:01follow the plans, there's a lot of expertise and skill there that you as the person who

53:06picked out bathroom tile didn't even know about. And so we do this all the time in the present.

53:12And for me, I wrote it during the pandemic, most of the book during the pandemic. And

53:18you know, I was completely overwhelmed. Let me be honest, I'm not a natural fourth grade

53:23mathematics teacher as it turns out. I felt like I was working really hard, but at the

53:29same time, my ability to, you know, keep my children mildly educated and alive was predicated

53:39on the fact that other people were bringing stuff to my house. That's partly because I

53:44was in New York City. And I had to have things delivered because I was in the high risk band.

53:49And so I felt like pretty good about it. I have to isolate because of my health, feeling

53:55a little, you know, like morally good about myself, but other people are being placed in

54:00harm's way on my behalf. And we don't even acknowledge them when we say the Amazon delivers

54:08things. I didn't acknowledge them when I said that Amazon delivers things. And so I think

54:13we still do this. We take a lot of work for granted. We don't appreciate the effort, the

54:20energy, the bodily costs, the expertise of the skills. And we tend to privilege certain

54:26kinds of knowledge over others when we shouldn't.

54:30Well, I think that's a wonderful takeaway. The book is great. We said it's coming out

54:37March 24th. Is that what we said? Six. Well, Canada Moss, thank you so much for joining

54:45us. Where can people? The book will be widely available, I assume Amazon can deliver it

54:51to your house. Amazon can deliver to your house. So it could run to noble, so so could an independent

54:57book. And if you have local bookstores that you can keep in business, you should definitely

55:05do that. Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. Well, thank you so much for coming on. You are

55:11going to be joining us, I believe, in our after party for the patrons. So friends at

55:18home, if you would like to hear more from Canada, please feel free to go to patreon.com/dataoverdogma

55:26and become a patron. At the $10 level, you can hear the after party, which is more content

55:34and it just makes you a part of helping to keep our show going. So we we appreciate all

55:40of our patrons dearly. If you'd like to contact us, you can reach us at contact@dataoverdogmapod.com

55:49and we'll talk to you again next week. Bye everybody.

55:56Data Over Dogma is a member of the airwave media podcast network. It is a production of

56:01Data Over Dogma Media LLC. Copyright 2023. All rights reserved.